Saturday June 3, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday June 3, 2023

Ontario and Federal Governments Teaming Up

May 17, 2023

In a shocking turn of events, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Premier Doug Ford have seemingly struck a deal with Stellantis that could make your head spin. Brace yourselves for a mind-boggling $13 billion in subsidies to save the Windsor battery factory. Yes, you heard it right, folks – more Canadian tax dollars may flow to Stellantis than what Germany’s Volkswagen received for their “gigafactory” near London.

But wait, there’s more! This grandiose move is not just about saving the battery factory; it’s about securing the future of Stellantis’s Brampton auto assembly plant as well. It’s as if the Ontario and Federal governments have become experts in printing money specifically for the subsidy-hungry automakers. Move over, U.S. President Joe Biden’s generous subsidies; Canada is ready to outdo you!

Opinion: Trudeau, Ford to blame for Stellantis shakedown  

April 28, 2023

Confidential sources in Ottawa and Queen’s Park spilled the beans, revealing that Premier Ford personally assured Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland that Ontario would step up to keep Stellantis from fleeing to the United States. With their close rapport, Ford and Freeland managed to clear the intergovernmental logjam just in time for the Stellantis board meeting. It’s all a part of the thrilling high-stakes drama unfolding behind closed doors.

While federal and provincial officials insist that details are still being worked out and there’s “a bit more work to do,” it’s hard to contain the excitement. Construction on Stellantis’s massive Windsor project had come to a screeching halt, but fear not! The subsidies will breathe life back into the $5-billion joint venture with Korea-based LG Energy Solution. Who needs a functional economy when you have electrifying subsidy deals?

Rumors abound that Ontario has significantly upped the ante, preparing to contribute billions to the final offer. Ford, the subsidy connoisseur, had already confirmed that he would increase the initial $500-million subsidy provided by the province. It’s all part of the grand conference call spectacle, where top officials from both levels of government meticulously discussed the timing and amounts of funding. The excitement is palpable!

In a stunning concession, Ontario has agreed to foot “a big chunk” of the production incentives for Stellantis, leaving Ottawa to pick up the rest of the tab. Move over, Volkswagen – your $500-million share of subsidies from Ontario is child’s play compared to what Stellantis might receive. The drama intensifies as negotiations continue, and workers across southwestern Ontario eagerly await the outcome of these normal, everyday subsidy negotiations.

September 5, 2020

Oh, and let’s not forget the regional fairness aspect that Deputy Prime Minister Freeland loves to emphasize. The federal government wants provinces to kick in more money for major clean energy investments. It’s all about spreading the subsidy love across the great land of Canada.

As Biden’s legislation sends shockwaves through the industry, it’s clear that Canada cannot afford to be left behind. We must match those mind-blowing U.S. subsidies or risk witnessing factories migrate south. It’s a race against time to secure the ultimate EV Battery Factory Subsidy Money Printing Facility. Buckle up, folks – the subsidy frenzy is just getting started! (AI)

 

Friday June 2, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday June 2, 2023

Inaction Plagues Canada’s Security System Despite Johnston Report

May 9, 2023

The Johnston report, investigating foreign interference and the government’s response, has failed to spur meaningful efforts to address Canada’s security and intelligence communication system. The reactions to the report reflect the fractured state of Canadian politics rather than a focus on its findings. This article argues that the lack of visible action in the face of the national security threat posed by foreign interference is concerning.

Mistrust of the government, fueled by responses to COVID-19 measures and protests, has tainted the discourse. Legitimate concerns about foreign interference have been overshadowed by baseless suspicions of compromised elections. Instead of tackling core issues, there is a preoccupation with scandal and scapegoats.

Analysis: What would it take for Canada to have a ‘serious’ debate about foreign interference?  

March 26, 2013

Johnston’s analysis, based on classified intelligence, discounts political misconduct allegations and questions media reporting on leaked documents. Unfortunately, the focus on sensationalism hinders progress and ignores his valuable insights.

Two dangers emerge from this inaction. Firstly, secondary battles distract from the urgent need to address foreign interference. Secondly, partisan approaches and weakened trust create vulnerabilities that authoritarian states exploit.

Johnston stresses the need for facts and truth in national security, calling for transparency and public understanding. Declassifying documents, strengthening independent review systems, and enforcing laws against foreign interference are crucial steps. Public hearings can facilitate accountability and include the voices of affected communities.

Despite the Johnston report, there is a lack of action to address Canada’s security system. It is essential to prioritize the protection of Canadian democracy from foreign interference. Moving beyond partisanship and focusing on transparency, facts, and implementing the recommendations are crucial for safeguarding national security. (AI)

The Parliament Buildings aren’t easy to draw. This clip shows how an old version I drew can be imported, altered, scaled, and replicated as a reference for the latest drawing. With the panda Wednesday night’s Nature episode served as added inspiration. Tablets make editorial cartooning so easy, the craft just needs younger recruits. Also, I’ve become aware of a growing thinking by people in the Chinese community that the dragon metaphor for China is cheesy and induces eye-rolls, even when referring to the clowns running operations in Beijing. – GM

 

 

 

Thursday June 1, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday June 1, 2023

Putin’s Hypocrisy: Denouncing Ukraine While Engaging in Immoral Invasion

Vladimir Putin’s recent denouncement of Ukraine’s attempt to “intimidate Russia” is nothing short of audacious. As his own forces continue an immoral invasion of Ukraine, resulting in the deaths of thousands of Ukrainians, including innocent civilians, Putin’s hypocrisy knows no bounds.

February 24, 2023

In his statement, Putin portrayed Ukraine’s biggest-ever drone strike on Moscow as a terrorist response to Russia’s previous strike on Ukraine’s military intelligence headquarters. He claimed that Ukraine had chosen the path of intimidation and attacks on residential buildings. However, the truth is glaringly obvious – Putin’s regime has been the aggressor in this conflict, relentlessly pursuing its expansionist agenda.

While Putin attempts to paint Ukraine as the villain, it is his own forces that have brought the 15-month war to the heart of Russia. Drone attacks, strikes on oil pipelines, and even an attack on the Kremlin itself have intensified in recent weeks. Despite Ukraine’s denial of involvement in the Moscow attack, U.S. intelligence believes otherwise. The New York Times reported that Kiev was responsible, further undermining Putin’s narrative.

News: Moscow drone attack: Putin says Ukraine trying to frighten Russians  

January 26, 2023

The Moscow attack struck prestigious areas of the city, including those where the Russian elite, including Putin, reside. Yet, despite this breach of security, many Muscovites carried on with their lives, displaying their famous fatalism. Putin’s propaganda machine ensured calm coverage, downplaying the severity of the situation.

Putin has consistently framed the conflict in Ukraine as a struggle against an arrogant and aggressive West, accusing them of risking a global war by supporting Ukraine. However, the reality is that Putin’s actions have caused one of the deadliest wars in Europe since World War Two. Russia’s relentless supply of weaponry to Ukraine and its expansionist ambitions have escalated the conflict, disregarding the lives of Ukrainians caught in the crossfire.

Furthermore, Putin’s claims of the West escalating the war by supporting Ukraine ring hollow. It is Russia that continues to violate international norms, ignoring the sovereignty of a neighbouring country and causing immense suffering. The United States, among others, has expressed a desire to avoid war with Russia and has urged Ukraine not to attack inside Russian territory.

Analysis: The Moscow drone attacks bring Russia’s war to its doorstep – and put Putin’s alternative reality at risk  

February 26, 2022

The audacity of Putin’s denouncement of Ukraine’s actions while his own forces perpetrate violence and invasion cannot be understated. His regime’s disregard for human life and blatant hypocrisy should be condemned by the international community. It is imperative that the world holds Putin accountable for his actions and supports Ukraine in its struggle for sovereignty and peace.

As the war in Ukraine rages on, the deaths of innocent Ukrainians and the destruction of their homeland cannot be forgotten. The international community must stand united against Putin’s aggression and support Ukraine in its quest for justice and freedom. Only by holding Putin accountable can we hope to prevent further loss of life and preserve the principles of peace and sovereignty that underpin global stability. (AI)

From sketch to finish, see the current way Graeme completes an editorial cartoon using an iPencil, the Procreate app, and a couple of cheats on an iPad Pro. If you’re creative, give editorial cartooning a try.

Wednesday May 31, 2023

May 31, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday May 31, 2023

Danielle Smith vs. Trudeau – Oil, Populism, and Federal Friction!

December 2, 2022

Alberta’s recent election witnessed the remarkable comeback of Premier Danielle Smith and her United Conservative Party (UCP). However, as Smith solidifies her position as premier, concerns arise about the potential tensions that may emerge between Alberta and the federal government, particularly under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Smith’s return to politics reintroduces a populist playbook that resonated with Albertans frustrated with COVID-19 restrictions and those seeking fundamental changes to Alberta’s role within Canada. This article explores the implications of Smith’s victory and the heightened conflict that may unfold in Canadian politics.

Smith’s campaign hinged on her promise to pass the Alberta Sovereignty Act, granting the provincial government the ability to opt out of enforcing federal legislation it deemed contrary to Alberta’s interests. While she tempered her stance on COVID-19 restrictions, the desire for increased provincial autonomy remained prevalent. The act was modified to become the Alberta Sovereignty Within a United Canada Act, aiming to ease concerns about secession while asserting Alberta’s constitutional toughness. By aligning with Saskatchewan’s similar efforts, Smith seeks to protect Alberta’s oil and gas industry and safeguard the province’s prosperity.

Opinion: The lessons for Pierre Poilievre from the Alberta election  

October 28, 2021

This election outcome sets the stage for potential clashes with the federal government. Smith’s victory, driven by support from oil and gas advocates, gives her a mandate to prioritize and defend the industry. As Alberta and Saskatchewan unite, they aim to push the federal government back within its designated boundaries, asserting provincial jurisdiction and potentially limiting federal actions. Such conflicts have the potential to strain federal-provincial relations, posing a significant challenge for Prime Minister Trudeau’s government.

Smith’s political challenges lie in reconciling competing pressures. To secure her victory, she had to appeal to centrist voters by advocating for well-funded public services and lower taxes. However, her populist base may exert pressure for more confrontational positions. Conflict with the federal government in support of oil and gas becomes a unifying stance, satisfying those who desire Alberta’s affluence and low tax rates while resonating with populists who share Smith’s resentment toward Ottawa.

Smith’s triumph holds lessons for Canadian conservatives. It demonstrates that centrist voters may overlook a leader’s controversial associations if presented with a strong economic proposition. However, it is important to recognize that Alberta’s unique circumstances as an oil-rich province contribute to the viability of such an offer. Other Canadian jurisdictions may not possess the same capacity.

News: United Conservatives’ narrow Alberta win sets up conflict with Trudeau  

October 14, 2022

Danielle Smith’s extraordinary political comeback as Alberta’s premier promises to have a profound impact on Canadian politics. As she assumes her role, tensions are likely to rise between Alberta and the federal government due to conflicting interests in resource development and environmental policies. Failure to resolve these conflicts in favor of Alberta may result in proposals for greater provincial autonomy, including the establishment of a provincial police force, pension plan, or revenue collection agency. Smith’s emergence as a prominent national figure raises questions about the future of Canadian politics and the delicate balance between federal and provincial powers. (AI)

 

Tuesday May 30, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday May 30, 2023

Doug Ford’s Greenbelt Blunder Exposes His Betrayal and Ignorance

March 23, 2023

In a shocking display of betrayal and ignorance, Ontario Premier Doug Ford has denounced the province’s cherished Greenbelt as a “scam” and dismissed its creation as a random act of the previous Liberal government. This absurd characterization is not only an insult to the countless professionals, citizens, and organizations who dedicated their time and expertise to establish the Greenbelt but also a blatant disregard for his own promises.

Let us not forget that during previous elections, Ford assured the public that his government “would not touch the Greenbelt.” Fast forward to the present, and we witness his administration allowing developers to encroach upon 3,000 hectares of the protected 800,000-hectare Greenbelt. Such a move, justified under the guise of addressing a housing crisis, raises serious concerns about the integrity of the decision-making process.

Opinion: Doug Ford needs to level with Ontarians about the Greenbelt  

May 9, 2023

The Premier’s decision has triggered investigations by both the integrity commissioner and the Auditor-General, amid allegations of unfair benefits bestowed upon developers with close ties to the government. The irony is striking. Ford, who claims to champion the interests of the people, appears to be serving the interests of his well-connected friends instead.

In his attempt to undermine the legitimacy of the Greenbelt, Ford casts doubt on the process by which it was created, alleging that it was haphazardly conceived using a dartboard and highlighters. These baseless accusations demean the hard work and dedication of experts, scientists, and planners who meticulously analyzed agricultural conditions and evaluated lands for inclusion. Victor Doyle, the former senior provincial planner involved in the Greenbelt’s development, emphatically refutes Ford’s claims, highlighting the comprehensive evaluation process that was undertaken.

January 12, 2023

Ford’s dismissal of the Greenbelt as a mere “fancy word” concocted by the Liberals is not only factually incorrect but also reveals his astonishing lack of understanding of the significant environmental, agricultural, and economic benefits it provides. The Greenbelt ensures clean water by protecting aquifers and rivers that feed the Great Lakes, safeguards forests that supply clean air and habitat for diverse wildlife, and preserves Canada’s prime farmland, which is crucial for food security and the economy. Moreover, the Greenbelt plays a pivotal role in mitigating climate change impacts through flood prevention, carbon sequestration, and temperature moderation.

It is ironic that Ford, as a member of the Progressive Conservative Party, denounces the Greenbelt while conveniently overlooking that the Greenbelt builds upon and expands the protections established by prior Conservative administrations, including the Niagara Escarpment and Oak Ridges Moraine Plans. The Greenbelt represents a culmination of extensive research, analysis, and consultation, incorporating the expertise of leading hydrologists, ecologists, biologists, and other specialists, as well as valuable input from local communities and stakeholders.

December 17, 2022

Ford’s comments about the Greenbelt reflect his profound disconnect from reality and his willingness to dismiss internationally recognized preservation initiatives as inconsequential. His disregard for the importance of protecting the environment, safeguarding water sources, and preserving green spaces for future generations is deeply troubling.

The Greenbelt is not a partisan issue. It transcends political affiliations, with supporters from all parties recognizing its significance in ensuring a sustainable and prosperous future for Ontario. The Premier’s attempt to carve up our green spaces to reward his wealthy associates is a clear demonstration of his misplaced priorities.

News: Doug Ford calling the Greenbelt a scam is ‘unbelievable,’ Canada’s environment minister says  

February 3, 2023

Furthermore, Ford’s audacious claim that his government has one of the best environmental records in Ontario’s history is a laughable distortion of reality. His actions speak louder than his empty words. From curbing the powers of conservation authorities to canceling renewable energy projects and weakening protections for endangered species, Ford’s track record demonstrates a concerning disregard for the environment.

It is disheartening to witness the leader of Ontario’s government spout baseless claims, belittle the efforts of dedicated professionals, and undermine a vital environmental asset. The Greenbelt stands as a testament to the power of collaboration, science, and evidence-based decision-making. It is a vision for a sustainable future that Ford has callously abandoned.

As concerned citizens, we must hold our elected officials accountable. We cannot allow the Greenbelt, a symbol of our commitment to environmental stewardship and the well-being of future generations, to be tarnished by the shortsightedness and political expediency of our leaders. It is time to stand up for the Greenbelt and demand that Ford’s government rectify its misguided actions. Our collective future depends on it. (AI)