Stephen Lecce – mackaycartoons

Tuesday August 20, 2024

August 20, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday August 20, 2024

Published in The Hamilton Spectator and The Toronto Star.

This editorial cartoon has an animated version!

Beneath the Priority List: The Education Minister’s Impossible Task in Ford’s Ontario

April 12, 2024

Taking on the role of Ontario’s Minister of Education under the Ford government might feel akin to inheriting a poisoned chalice. Todd Smith’s quick departure after just a few months in the position highlights not just personal dissatisfaction, but the deeper systemic issues within the province’s education portfolio—issues exacerbated by a series of dubious decisions and questionable priorities set by the Ford administration.

The Ford government’s approach to education has been characterized by underfunding, controversial policy shifts, and a seeming lack of genuine commitment to addressing the growing challenges in the sector. One of the most glaring examples is the government’s budget cuts to education, which have left schools struggling with overcrowded classrooms, insufficient support staff, and outdated resources. The impact of these cuts has been particularly harsh in underserved communities, where schools rely heavily on provincial funding to provide basic services.

News: Ontario Education Minister Todd Smith resigns two weeks before start of school year, replaced by Jill Dunlop

January 23, 2024

The government’s handling of teacher negotiations has also drawn considerable criticism. The introduction of Bill 124, which limited public sector wage increases, was not only ruled unconstitutional but also deepened the recruitment and retention crisis in Ontario’s schools. The result? Fewer teachers, fewer educational assistants, and a growing discontent among those who remain, forced to do more with less. The subsequent arbitration ruling in favour of educators, while a victory for workers’ rights, underscores the adversarial relationship that has developed between the Ford government and the education sector.

Further complicating matters is the Ford administration’s approach to curriculum changes. The push to return to “basics” in education, such as the controversial revisions to the sex education and mathematics curriculums, suggests a reluctance to embrace progressive educational reforms. Instead of consulting with educators and experts to develop a curriculum that reflects the needs of today’s students, the government has favoured a more regressive approach, often sidelining those who are most knowledgeable about the education system.

August 29, 2019

Then there’s the matter of accountability. The Ford government has repeatedly been criticized for its lack of transparency and its tendency to sidestep responsibility for the ongoing crises in Ontario’s schools. The situation is further aggravated by the administration’s apparent preference for pursuing populist policies—like expanding alcohol sales—over addressing the more pressing issues within the education system.

Analysis: An anatomy of a bungled press conference

March 19, 2019

In this context, any new Minister of Education faces an uphill battle. The role demands not just a deep understanding of the educational landscape, but also the political acumen to navigate a government that seems more interested in quick political wins than in making meaningful, long-term investments in education. With teacher shortages, declining student performance, and growing dissatisfaction among educators and parents alike, the challenges are immense. Whether the Ford government will finally step up and prioritize education remains to be seen, but history suggests that anyone in this role will have to fight hard to make it happen. (AI)

Wednesday May 1, 2024

May 1, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday May 1, 2024

Beyond the Classroom: Addressing the Broader Problem of Smartphone Addiction

September 3, 2013

The recent decision by the Ontario government to ban cell phones in classrooms has reignited the debate over the role of smartphones in education. While this move has sparked discussions about distractions and academic performance, it also brings to light a broader issue: smartphone addiction among adults.

Smartphones have become ubiquitous in our society, seamlessly integrated into every aspect of our daily lives. From morning alarms to late-night scrolling sessions, these devices are constant companions, offering a gateway to endless information and entertainment. However, the convenience and connectivity they provide come at a cost.

The addictive nature of smartphones is undeniable. Research has shown that excessive smartphone use can lead to a range of negative outcomes, including decreased productivity, impaired social interactions, and heightened levels of stress and anxiety. Despite these consequences, many adults find themselves unable to break free from the grip of their devices.

Editorial: “Out of sight, out of mind.” There are many good reasons to curb cellphones in class

September 17, 2010

The Ontario government’s decision to ban cell phones in classrooms is a step in the right direction, but it only scratches the surface of a much larger problem. Smartphone addiction extends far beyond the confines of the classroom, affecting individuals in all aspects of their lives – from the workplace to social settings and even in the privacy of their own homes.

In the workplace, smartphones blur the boundaries between professional and personal life, leading to a constant state of connectivity and an expectation of immediate responsiveness. This can result in burnout and decreased job satisfaction, as individuals struggle to maintain a healthy work-life balance.

November 2, 2017

In social settings, smartphones have replaced face-to-face interactions, leading to a decline in meaningful connections and a rise in feelings of loneliness and isolation. Instead of engaging with those around us, we often find ourselves glued to our screens, missing out on the richness of human connection.

Even in our downtime, smartphones continue to hold sway over our lives. The temptation to check email, scroll through social media, or binge-watch videos can be irresistible, leaving us feeling drained and unfulfilled.

Addressing smartphone addiction requires a multi-faceted approach that goes beyond classroom bans. It requires a cultural shift in how we view and interact with technology, as well as policies and interventions aimed at promoting digital well-being.

May 20, 2017

Tech companies must take responsibility for their role in perpetuating addictive behaviours, by designing products and services that prioritize user well-being over engagement metrics. Governments can play a role by implementing regulations that curb the most harmful aspects of smartphone use, such as excessive screen time and targeted advertising.

But ultimately, the onus is on us as individuals to take control of our technology use and establish healthier habits. This means setting boundaries, practicing mindfulness, and seeking support when needed.

The Ontario government’s ban on cell phones in classrooms is a wake-up call, highlighting the need for a broader conversation about smartphone addiction in our society. It’s time to recognize the true extent of the problem and take meaningful steps to address it, both in the classroom and beyond. (AI)

From sketch to finish, see the current way Graeme completes an editorial cartoon using an iPencil, the Procreate app, and a couple of cheats on an iPad Pro. If you’re creative, give illustration a try:

Wednesday January 23, 2024

January 24, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday January 23, 2024

Ontario’s Kindergarten Curriculum Makeover: A Balancing Act Amidst Past Greenbelt Controversies

March 19, 2019

Ah, Doug Ford, the man with a plan. Or, well, at least a plan to revamp Ontario’s kindergarten curriculum. Because, you know, nothing says “education reform” like a leader who once tried to turn the Greenbelt into a suburban paradise. But hey, let’s not dwell on past mistakes; let’s focus on the bright future of Ontario’s little tots and their newfound appreciation for fractions and phonics.

In a groundbreaking move that will undoubtedly reshape the trajectory of the province, Education Minister Stephen Lecce announced the government’s grand plan to mix “back to basics” instruction with play-based learning in kindergarten. Finally, the kids will be able to recite the alphabet while constructing houses with blocks. Who knew learning could be so… constructive?

News: Doug Ford government to revamp full-day kindergarten curriculum

April 19, 2023

Lecce emphasized the importance of developing “core foundational skills” in our youngest students. Because, let’s face it, the fate of the entire province rests on whether Timmy can correctly identify an up arrow or if Susie can spell “foundation” while building her Lego masterpiece. Move over, Shakespeare, the future literary giants are in kindergarten.

But let’s not forget the genius behind this educational revolution – Doug Ford, the man who once thought it would be a great idea to sacrifice the Greenbelt for the sake of affordable housing. Because who needs a protected environmental area when you can have a few more cookie-cutter houses, right?

In the 2018 election, Ford vowed to open up the Greenbelt, promising developers a piece of the protected pie. However, after a brief moment of enlightenment (or perhaps a strong public backlash), he backtracked, claiming he wouldn’t develop the area after all. Fast forward to 2022, and surprise, surprise – he did exactly what he said he wouldn’t.

September 23, 2023

The Auditor General then swooped in, revealing a flawed process that conveniently favoured certain developers, leading to the removal of 7,400 acres of Greenbelt land. The cost? A mere $8 billion. But hey, who’s counting when you’re reshaping the landscape of the province, one questionable decision at a time?

Ford’s Housing Minister, Steve Clark, faced calls to resign, with the Integrity Commissioner confirming ethics rule violations. But who needs ethical governance when you can build affordable homes for “newcomers and young people” on the Greenbelt? Forget the environment; think of the children – the ones who will be marvelling at their newly constructed block houses in kindergarten.

In the end, after a series of resignations, apologies, and promises to build within urban boundaries, Ford decided to reverse his decision and restore the Greenbelt lands. A true masterclass in leadership and decision-making, wouldn’t you say?

So, as Ontario gears up for the kindergarten curriculum overhaul, let’s all take a moment to appreciate the strategic mind behind it all – the man who brought you Greenbelt chaos and now wants your four-year-old to master fractions. Bravo, Doug Ford, bravo. (AI)

Wednesday April 19, 2023

April 19, 2023 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday April 19, 2023

Stephen Lecce’s Education Agenda Fails Ontario’s Students

November 2, 2022

As Ontario’s education minister, Stephen Lecce has been pushing for a “back to basics” approach in the province’s schools, emphasizing reading, writing, and math. However, his recent introduction of legislation that gives him greater control over school boards and sets student achievement priorities has been met with criticism and skepticism from educators, parents, and unions alike.

One of the main concerns is that Lecce’s approach fails to address the real issues plaguing Ontario’s schools. The overcrowded classrooms, understaffed schools, and crumbling infrastructure are serious problems that require immediate attention. Instead of addressing these pressing concerns, Lecce seems more focused on standardized test scores as a measure of success, which critics argue is narrow and limited in its scope.

News: Doug Ford government sets sights on Ontario’s school system

July 29, 2022

Lecce’s emphasis on standardized test scores as the sole measure of student achievement is shortsighted and fails to recognize the holistic nature of education. Education is not just about reading, writing, and math; it’s about fostering critical thinking skills, creativity, problem-solving, and social-emotional development. By narrowing the focus solely on test scores, Lecce is neglecting the broader needs of students and ignoring the importance of a well-rounded education.

Moreover, Lecce’s approach of “government overreach” and greater control over school boards is worrisome. Critics argue that local school boards and educators are better positioned to understand the unique needs of their students and communities, and imposing top-down mandates from the government may not be the most effective solution. The move to standardize training for trustees and board officials, as well as performance appraisals for directors of education, may not necessarily lead to improved outcomes for students, and it may further erode local autonomy in education decision-making.

August 6, 2020

Furthermore, the funding increase of 2.7 per cent announced by Lecce for the next academic year falls short of meeting the needs of Ontario’s schools. With overcrowded classrooms and understaffed schools, students are not receiving the attention and support they need to succeed. The recent hiring of 1,000 teachers for specialized math and literacy programs is a positive step, but it may not be enough to address the larger systemic issues facing Ontario’s education system.

Another concern is the proposed use of surplus school board properties for housing. While affordable housing is an important issue, repurposing school properties may not be the most effective solution. Schools are essential community spaces that provide a safe and inclusive environment for learning, and repurposing them for other purposes may have long-term consequences for students and communities.

March 19, 2019

It’s also worth noting that Lecce’s approach fails to acknowledge the existing efforts and achievements of Ontario’s schools. The province’s education system has been recognized as one of the top-performing systems nationally and internationally, as stated by the Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario. While there is always room for improvement, Lecce’s overhaul of the education system seems unnecessary and lacking in a clear vision for the future.

In conclusion, Stephen Lecce’s approach to education in Ontario falls short of addressing the real issues facing schools. The emphasis on standardized test scores, government overreach, and lack of adequate funding and support for schools and students are significant concerns. Instead of focusing on narrow measures of success, Lecce should prioritize addressing the overcrowded classrooms, understaffed schools, and crumbling infrastructure that hinder student learning. Ontario’s education system needs a comprehensive and holistic approach that takes into account the diverse needs of students and communities, and empowers local educators and school boards to make informed decisions. It’s time for Lecce to listen to the concerns of educators, parents, and students, and work towards meaningful solutions that truly benefit Ontario’s schools. (AI)

Wednesday November 2, 2022

November 2, 2022 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday November 2, 2022

Ontario government’s wrecking ball negotiating tactic not an answer

Prior to the last province-wide crisis in education, Mike Harris government education minister John Snobelen promised to make changes in Ontario’s education policy by “creating a crisis.”

July 29, 2022

Sadly, it looks like Doug Ford and his education minister, Stephen Lecce, are planning to do the same thing. This week, rather than continuing bargaining with Canadian Union of Public Employees education workers, the province passed a back-to-work law before a job action could begin, imposed an non-negotiated contract arbitrarily, and promised to use the notwithstanding clause of Canada’s constitution to fend off any legal challenges.

Why? Lecce says it is in response to CUPE’s having given strike notice that job action could — not would — start as early as this Friday. The sledgehammer approach is needed to guarantee “stability” in education, says Lecce.

That’s a red herring. In the event of job action, Hamilton public schools will remain open. In Halton, schools will move to alternative scheduling to allow for adequate cleaning. And the Hamilton Catholic board has said it would close schools.

October 20, 2021

Clearly, denying collective bargaining to education assistants, custodians, early childhood educators and office staff wasn’t destined to close all schools as Lecce claims. So just what is the government’s agenda? Will it do the same when crunch-time comes while bargaining with teachers? Does the government intend to take away bargaining rights from all education workers?

CUPE education workers, 70 per cent of whom are women, are the lowest paid in the school system. On average, they earn $39,000 a year. With inflation, they have seen real wage reduction of more than 10 per cent. CUPE is seeking 11.7 per cent increases.

We’re not judging whether that increase is justified or not, or whether the province’s offer, closer to 1 per cent, is remotely fair. That’s what negotiations are for, including mediation and ultimately arbitration.

But prematurely neutering the bargaining process by declaring any job action illegal is not fair, ethical or wise.

August 20, 2012

The last government that tried imposing a contract on education workers was the McGuinty Liberal government. In 2016, Justice Thomas Lederer of the Ontario Superior Court said of that imposition: “When reviewed in the context of the Charter and the rights it provides, it becomes apparent that the process engaged in was fundamentally flawed. It could not, by its design, provide meaningful collective bargaining.”

The Ford government clearly anticipated a similar finding, and is already prepared to use the notwithstanding clause — the constitution’s nuclear option — to ignore any legal ruling. That is an abuse of the intention of the clause.

Consider the words of federal Justice Minister David Lametti, who is looking at how Ottawa could challenge the province’s use of the notwithstanding clause.

June 11, 2021

“It de facto means that people’s rights are being infringed and it’s being justified using the notwithstanding clause,” he said. “Using it pre-emptively is exceedingly problematic. It cuts off both political debate and judicial scrutiny.”

The fact that the province has already decided to use the nuclear option also suggests it knows full well it is violating the constitutional rights of education workers. Otherwise it wouldn’t need to rely on the notwithstanding clause prior to any adjudication. We should be concerned that our government is knowingly violating the rights of 55,000 Ontarians, including thousands in Hamilton and Halton.

No one wants schools closed. No one wants an education strike. But are we willing to accept accomplishing those objectives by force, taking a wrecking ball to the collective bargaining process?

If we are, we would be wise to ask ourselves: Who, and what, is next? (Hamilton Spectator Editorial)