strategy – mackaycartoons

Thursday May 1, 2025

May 1, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday May 1, 2025 (The Toronto Star)

The Conservative Conundrum: Disunity and Factionalism Post-Election

April 25, 2025

The recent federal election has laid bare the deep-rooted disunity and factionalism within Canada’s Conservative Party, underscoring a schism that has evolved over decades. As Pierre Poilievre grapples with his electoral defeat and the loss of his Ottawa-area seat, the internal blame game has commenced, revealing persistent tensions within the conservative ranks.

Pierre Poilievre’s decision to remain as leader, despite losing his seat, highlights the complexities of the current situation. His leadership style, which aligns with the populist, Alberta-centred wing of conservatism, contrasts with the Progressive Conservative tradition led by figures like Doug Ford. This ideological rift, dating back to the eras of Preston Manning and Stephen Harper, continues to challenge the party’s cohesion.

News: ‘It’s an unmitigated disaster’: Conservative insiders debate Pierre Poilievre’s future as leader after election defeat

April 19, 2025

The schism within the Conservative Party has evolved through key historical milestones. During the 1990s, the Reform Party, led by Preston Manning, emphasized Western interests, fiscal conservatism, and skepticism of federal intervention. Stephen Harper later unified the Reform and Progressive Conservative factions to form the modern Conservative Party, but underlying tensions have persisted.

The party has seen recent leadership turnover reflecting these internal divisions. Andrew Scheer, who led the party in the 2019 election, was criticized for being too socially conservative and was subsequently replaced. Erin O’Toole, who moved the party towards the centre, faced rejection in the aftermath of the 2021 election, highlighting the ongoing struggle to find a leadership approach that resonates with the entire conservative base.

April 9, 2025

Poilievre represents the values of the Reform wing, focusing on conservative fiscal policies and provincial autonomy. His allies, such as Danielle Smith and Scott Moe, share these priorities. In contrast, Doug Ford embodies the centrist Progressive Conservative tradition, emphasizing pragmatic governance and coalition-building. Tim Houston of Nova Scotia aligns with this more moderate approach.

The election results have intensified internal blame and criticism. Figures like Jamil Jivani have accused Ford of undermining Poilievre’s campaign, while Ford’s public criticisms of Poilievre’s strategy reflect deeper personal and political tensions. Ford’s strategic decision to distance himself highlights his alignment with more centrist values and his potential ambitions within the broader Conservative movement.

News: MP accuses Doug Ford of ‘sabotaging’ federal election campaign by helping Liberals

March 25, 2025

The schism is further exacerbated by Poilievre’s perceived lack of outreach and collaboration with key political figures, including Ford. This strategic misstep isolated his campaign and limited its appeal beyond its populist base. The absence of a united front, especially in critical regions like Ontario, hindered the party’s electoral success.

The Conservative Party now faces a critical juncture. Addressing internal divisions and fostering unity will be essential for future success. The challenge lies in balancing the priorities of both factions and presenting a cohesive platform that resonates with a national audience.

January 15, 2025

Reconciliation efforts must focus on bridging the gap between the Reform and Progressive Conservative traditions. This involves finding common ground on key issues, fostering dialogue, and embracing a leadership approach that unites rather than divides.

As the Conservative Party stands at a crossroads, the recent election serves as a stark reminder of the challenges posed by disunity and factionalism. Pierre Poilievre’s leadership, now under scrutiny, embodies the complexities of balancing the party’s diverse ideological factions. His approach and ability to navigate these internal tensions will significantly influence the party’s trajectory.

Ultimately, the Conservative Party’s path forward hinges on its capacity to reconcile internal differences and adapt to the evolving political landscape. As Poilievre’s leadership is evaluated, there is a pressing need for reflection and adaptation to chart a course that ensures future success and stability. The party must seize this moment to unify and present a vision that resonates across the Canadian political spectrum.

Thursday April 24, 2025

April 24, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday April 24, 2025

As the NDP faces a potential decline in support, Jagmeet Singh’s leadership is under scrutiny, highlighting the party’s need for strategic realignment and renewed focus on core values.

The NDP Faces a Crossroads Amidst Election Uncertainty

March 27, 2025

As Canadians prepare to vote, the New Democratic Party (NDP), under Jagmeet Singh, is facing a tough election. Polls suggest a potential decline in support that could jeopardize the party’s status, highlighting the urgent need for change and strategic adjustment.

Opinion: Donald Trump pounds another nail into the NDP’s coffin

Jagmeet Singh’s leadership has been under intense scrutiny. Since becoming leader in 2017, Singh has had to navigate challenging political landscapes. Yet, his tenure is marked by decisions that have blurred the NDP’s distinct identity. The party’s agreement with the Liberals in 2022, though it brought some policy wins like dental and pharmacare coverage, has left voters wondering what makes the NDP different from the Liberals.

September 6, 2024

Strategically, the NDP has struggled to maintain its footing. By supporting the Liberal government, the party inadvertently gave the Conservatives a chance to gain ground, especially on issues like affordability, traditionally an NDP stronghold. This has led to a loss of support, with voters increasingly turning to parties they see as more capable of addressing pressing economic concerns.

Externally, the influence of Donald Trump has shifted voter focus towards leaders perceived as strong on international trade and relations. This shift has made it challenging for the NDP’s focus on social issues to resonate. Internally, the party grapples with an identity crisis, where a shift towards more fringe policies has alienated moderate supporters.

Critics also point to the NDP’s ambitious social programs, questioning how they plan to fund these initiatives. The perception that the party is out of touch with economic realities has eroded its credibility, even among supporters who align with its social ideals.

Analysis: Singh’s fateful steps

February 29, 2024

Despite these challenges, the situation presents an opportunity for the NDP to regroup and redefine its role. A change in leadership might be necessary to inject fresh energy and realign the party’s strategies with voter priorities. By focusing on core values like healthcare and social equality, and balancing these with economic pragmatism, the NDP can offer a clear and credible alternative to Canadians.

The party’s future will depend on its ability to adapt and reconnect with voters. As the election approaches, how the NDP addresses these challenges will determine its immediate success and long-term role in Canadian politics.

Dire Dipper Days

Pity the NDP and its leader, Jagmeet Singh, whose tenure may be one of the most consequential in decades due to his influence over Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government. Through the Liberal-NDP Supply and Confidence agreement, Singh championed pharmacare, dental care, and elements of the childcare plan. Yet, with just days before the 2025 federal election, the NDP languishes in single-digit support. It seems the party is headed for a harsh voter backlash, possibly signalling the end of Singh’s leadership after eight years. Whether he became too much of a prop for the Liberals, prolonged parliament for his pension, or faced racial bias, the outcome remains uncertain. Though I’m not an NDP member, Singh has been undeniably impactful in enacting NDP policies. Historically, the NDP has influenced significant social reforms, like universal healthcare and the Canada Pension Plan. Today, the party is overshadowed by a national crisis favuoring the Liberals and Conservatives. Though Singh may soon lose his position, his legacy of social benefits for Canadians stands strong.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 24, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

Youtube: April 24, 2025 https://youtu.be/WeNiZj0fLH0

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Wednesday April 23, 2025

April 22, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday April 23, 2025

Canada’s Quiet Resolve in Strengthening Defence Amid Global Uncertainty

March 1, 2024

In the ever-shifting landscape of global politics, where alliances are tested and national interests recalibrated, Canada finds itself at a pivotal juncture. Recent events and political shifts have underscored a growing realization among NATO member countries, including Canada, that bolstering military capabilities is not just a response to external pressures, but a strategic necessity for a world where traditional security assurances can no longer be taken for granted.

The backdrop to this realization is a United States led by President Donald Trump, whose rhetoric and actions have raised concerns about America’s commitment to global security frameworks established post-World War II. Trump’s calls for NATO allies to increase defence spending to five percent of GDP, though seemingly about shared burden, mask a deeper unease about the U.S.’s role as a reliable security partner. Trump’s annexation rhetoric concerning Canada and Greenland, while alarming, reflects an unpredictable approach to international relations that has left many allies wary.

News: Trump wants NATO to spend 5% on defence. What do Canada party leaders say?

January 12, 2022

Canada, traditionally seen as a steadfast partner within NATO, has faced criticism for not meeting the alliance’s defence spending target of two percent of GDP. Yet, there’s a nuanced understanding emerging among Canadian political leaders. Both Liberal Leader Mark Carney and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre have now committed to reaching the two percent target by 2030, aligning their strategies to ensure Canada’s sovereignty and security in an increasingly unstable world. This alignment signifies a shared recognition of the importance of enhancing military capabilities amidst global uncertainties.

This decision reflects a pragmatic approach to defence policy. Canada recognizes that in a world where the U.S. might retreat from its role as a global security guarantor, it must step up to ensure its own defence readiness. The focus is on modernizing the military, securing the Arctic, and investing in cutting-edge technologies like AI and quantum computing, all while maintaining fiscal responsibility.

News: Mark Carney unveils a plan to Trump-proof Canada

July 12, 2018

Canada’s resolve to meet NATO commitments “on its own terms” is emblematic of a broader trend among NATO members. Many countries are recalibrating their defence policies not just due to external pressures from the U.S., but because of the realization that global threats are multifaceted. The unpredictability of a U.S. administration dismissive of trade and military alliances only adds to the urgency.

In this context, Canada’s approach is both sensible and strategic. It is about strengthening defence capabilities while fostering unity and consensus among political leaders. The decision to bolster military spending is not about succumbing to external demands but about safeguarding national interests in a changing global order.

As Canada moves forward, the focus should remain on maintaining a balanced approach that prioritizes security, economic stability, and diplomatic engagement. By doing so, Canada can navigate the complexities of international relations with resilience and resolve, ensuring its place as a respected and reliable partner on the world stage.

PPs 2% Promise

I’ve been closely following Pierre Poilievre’s approach to Canada’s NATO obligations, and his recent commitment to the 2% GDP defence target by 2030 has caught my attention. Until last week’s debate, Poilievre hadn’t specified a timeline, often critiquing the Liberals’ fluctuating target dates between 2028 and 2034 over the past couple of years without presenting his own. Now, it turns out his target aligns precisely with the Liberals’ plan, even as countries worldwide are exceeding the 2% benchmark.

Interestingly, Poilievre’s decision to announce this commitment late in the campaign suggests strategic timing. It’s likely not a stance that would be met with overwhelming enthusiasm, especially within his own party, where it could be quite polarizing. Let’s face it, bolstering defence—even amid increased threats—isn’t high on the average voter’s priority list, particularly with the cost of living crisis intensifying as Trump ramps up tariffs.

This revelation suggests that Poilievre might not be as hawkish as many believed. His mealy mouthed attitude toward supporting Ukraine’s struggle against Putin tyranny is a chief indicator of this for another day. While he shares Trump’s scepticism towards international agreements and multilateralism, evidenced by his rare mention of the Paris Accord, his reticence on NATO commitments raises questions. Nevertheless, he acknowledges the need to strengthen Canada’s military, including against potential U.S. threats.

Historically, Canada’s Conservative Party has championed robust military and defence policies. Yet, in the era of Donald Trump, who demands a 5% GDP commitment to NATO, one might expect Canadian conservatives to follow suit. Instead, Poilievre’s proposal mirrors the Liberals’, aiming for 2030, which I find both intriguing and somewhat lacking.

While I often see parallels between Canadian conservatives and Trump’s Republicans, this divergence is significant. The traditional hawks within Canada’s Conservative Party appear to have less influence, a point worth noting. When it comes to defence, the differences between Canada’s two major parties offered to voters are strikingly similar.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 23, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

PPs 2% Promise https://youtu.be/7QXYW_dp024

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Wednesday April 16, 2025

April 16, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday April 16, 2025

Ontario’s Balancing Act and Tariffs and Turmoil

March 26, 2025

Ontario’s government has delivered the Speech from the Throne, marking a pivotal moment in the province’s journey through complex domestic and international challenges. Premier Doug Ford’s administration has laid out its agenda, highlighting efforts to counter U.S. tariffs and address pressing internal issues.

In the speech, the government pledged to remove barriers to interprovincial trade and expedite approvals for new mines in the Northern Ring of Fire region, emphasizing its strategic importance to Ontario’s economy and security. This move reflects a commitment to economic resilience and a response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s trade policies, underscoring that “Canada will never be the 51st state.”

The Throne Speech also reaffirmed Ontario’s dedication to the electric vehicle and battery industry, securing significant investments and maintaining a leadership role in North America. Despite critiques of substantial subsidies from Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, the province remains committed to supporting this vital sector.

News: Trump and Ontario’s tariff response likely to dominate Ford’s throne speech

March 12, 2025

Domestically, the speech addressed the need for immediate action in healthcare, housing, and social services. Ford’s administration recognizes the urgency of reducing wait times, improving housing affordability, and tackling social issues such as homelessness, poverty, mental health, and drug addiction.

The ambitious infrastructure plan, including a new tunnel expressway under Highway 401, is part of a broader $200-billion initiative to enhance transit and economic efficiency in Ontario, despite potential high costs.
The Ontario government’s resolve to navigate both international pressures and domestic challenges is evident. The Speech from the Throne serves as a comprehensive blueprint for strengthening the social fabric of the province, ensuring economic stability, and improving the quality of life for Ontarians.

As the government implements these plans, Premier Ford’s leadership will be measured by his ability to protect Ontario’s interests on the global stage while delivering tangible improvements to the lives of its citizens. The path forward requires a careful balance of diplomacy, innovation, and investment, with Ontarians keenly observing the government’s actions in this critical period.

Shopping for Thrones

Donald Trump seems to have quite the royal flair, doesn’t he? His foray into politics comes complete with all the pomp and circumstance you’d expect from a would-be king. From turning rallies into theatrical spectacles to ceremonies that have you wondering if a crown might appear, he’s certainly not shy about projecting a larger-than-life image.

His leadership style, marked by attempts to expand his power and tweak the rules, draws cheers from his fans who love the break from tradition. Meanwhile, critics are left clutching their pearls, worried about the potential for a royal takeover.

Trump’s fascination with all things regal seems like both a play for power and a personal love affair with the grandeur of monarchy. As his influence lingers, his royal tendencies keep everyone talking.

In my editorial cartoon for Wednesday, I poke a bit of fun at this ongoing dialogue about Trump’s king-like ambitions—a theme I can’t help but revisit. Today’s Speech From The Throne in Ontario consumed by the threat of Trump tariffs seemed like an apt occasion to put him in the scene.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 16, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

April 16, 2025 | Shopping For Thrones https://youtu.be/N3Jjxg8R21g

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Friday April 11, 2025

April 11, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday April 11, 2025 (Also, The Toronto Star, April 13, 2025)

A Circus of Chaos and Consequences

April 10, 2025

In the annals of American leadership, few figures have managed to blend showmanship with governance quite like Donald Trump. Touting himself as the mastermind behind “The Art of the Deal,” Trump promised to harness his negotiating prowess to fortify the U.S. economy and elevate its standing on the global stage. Yet, as recent events have painfully demonstrated, Trump’s leadership style has proven less an art form and more a chaotic spectacle, reminiscent of a ratings-dropping game show rather than strategic statecraft.

Opinion: What Trump Just Cost America

Trump’s recent decision to impose and then abruptly pause tariffs, excluding China, has not only destabilized markets but shattered trust in American leadership. Announcing a 90-day pause, Trump expected foreign leaders to flock to his door, eager to negotiate. Instead, as Thomas L. Friedman of The New York Times aptly noted, his actions have echoed the old adage: if you hire clowns, expect a circus.

The administration’s rationale for these tariffs — from curbing fentanyl to funding tax cuts — fluctuated as erratically as the stock market during his tenure. Trump’s so-called principles crumbled under pressure, revealing a strategy not rooted in sound economic theory but in impulse-driven theatrics. The result? A loss of billions and an even more invaluable currency: trust.

Opinion: America is lost. But we can still save the rest of the world from Trump’s tariffs

April 3, 2025

In one fell swoop, Trump equated long-standing allies with adversaries like China and Russia, applying tariffs indiscriminately and disregarding decades of partnership. Countries that stood shoulder to shoulder with the U.S. in moments of global crisis were left questioning their alliance with a nation that seemed to value spectacle over substance.

Friedman likened this diplomatic blunder to the Biden administration’s withdrawal from Afghanistan — a strategic misstep that Trump’s tariffs have now emulated in the trade arena. Yet, unlike Afghanistan, this self-imposed trade war has no exit strategy, leaving America isolated at a time when unity is paramount.

Trump’s approach to China, a nation with vast manufacturing capabilities, was a tactical misfire. Rather than rallying global allies to address trade imbalances collaboratively, Trump went it alone, fostering animosity instead of alliance. Friedman highlights this failure to unite against a common economic rival as a critical error, strengthening Beijing’s position while allies now view China as a more stable partner than the unpredictable U.S.

News: Trump’s Encouragement of Stock Investors Draws Scrutiny

March 26, 2025

The Trump era’s hallmark is not economic resurgence but rather a profound erosion of American values and influence. His administration’s apparent disregard for ethical governance has fueled suspicions of market manipulation and insider trading, with allegations, as Friedman points out, that Trump’s inner circle profited from his policy pivots. Such actions, if proven, would underscore a presidency marred by self-interest and oligarchic tendencies.

In the end, Trump’s “Art of the Deal” narrative unfolds more like an episode of “Let’s Make a Deal,” where the stakes are not merely ratings but the very credibility and leadership of the United States. As the curtain falls on this chapter of American policymaking, the world grapples with a sobering reality: faith in American leadership has been not just shaken, but shattered.

As America navigates the aftermath of Trump’s tenure, it must work tirelessly to rebuild the bridges burned by his reckless policies. This requires a commitment to transparency, ethical governance, and strategic alliances that prioritize collective prosperity over individual gain. Only then can the U.S. hope to restore its standing as a leader not just in power, but in principle.

Pardon the Conspiracy theory But… As I’ve been reading through various articles and the comments sections, one thing is clear: the idea of insider trading is dominating people’s minds. Many are questioning who might have been tipped off about the reversal. It feels eerily similar to the 2008 scenario, with concerns about how many people panicked and sold low, only for a select few to profit when the market surged.

The opinion pieces aren’t holding back either, pointing out how Trump’s actions have not only wiped out investments but also eroded trust in the system. It’s frustrating to see such recklessness from someone in charge, and the lack of transparency and accountability is a real concern.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 11, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack