Maple Maga – mackaycartoons

Friday August 14, 2026

August 14, 2026 by Graeme MacKay Leave a Comment

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday August 14 2026

U.S. Divide and Conquer: Canadian Unity Put to the Test

April 30, 2025

Recent expert analyses suggest that the Trump administration’s approach to trade, marked by threatened tariffs, may be driving wedges between Canadian provinces. University of Calgary economics professor Trevor Tombe highlights the potential impact: 13.7% of B.C. exports to the U.S. would be hit by new tariffs, while roughly 1% of exports from Saskatchewan and Alberta would be affected. Quebec could see 10.8% of its exports impacted, with 9% of Ontario’s exports exposed to these tariffs. This unsettling development is compounded by perceptions that the U.S. is actively fomenting Alberta separatism. Such actions render past inquiries into foreign interference almost trivial when considering the looming presence of the U.S. as a more menacing foreign meddler than any previously identified actor like China, Russia, Iran, or India.

News: Experts warn Trump may be driving wedges between provinces with threatened tariffs

February 26, 2026

The disparity in economic power between the U.S. and Canada is stark. The U.S., with its immense economic heft, often dictates the terms of trade negotiations, leaving Canada in a precarious position. Protectionist policies and tariffs hurt both economies, inflicting the greatest pain on ordinary citizens who face higher prices and job losses.

Early in the trade war, Canada employed its own tactics by targeting U.S. states based on voting tendencies. Some provinces imposed bans on U.S.-sourced wine and spirit sales, while Canadians showed their displeasure by boycotting leisure travel to the U.S. and avoiding U.S. products when shopping. Specific examples include tariffs targeting Florida’s agricultural products, whiskey from Kentucky and Tennessee, and appliances from Ohio and South Carolina. Red states have borne the brunt of Canada’s countermeasures against Trump’s trade war, a conflict designed to economically hurt Canada. These actions underscore the complex interplay of political strategy and economic survival.

Analysis: Trump’s 338 Tariffs as Provincial Divide and Conquer

November 18, 2024

To navigate this challenging landscape, Canada must leverage strategic partnerships, innovation, and soft power. By diversifying trade ties and investing in technology, Canada can reduce dependency and enhance competitiveness. This approach requires a unified national strategy, acknowledging internal political divisions, particularly among Conservative elements that align with (maple) MAGA ideologies.

A cohesive Canadian response is crucial. By fostering resilience through diversification and technology investments, Canada can strengthen its position on the global stage. This strategy not only counters U.S. economic pressure but also positions Canada as a forward-thinking, innovative nation.

May 21, 2026

Increased investment in innovation and technology is vital. By prioritizing these areas, Canada can reduce its economic vulnerability and build a more sustainable, competitive economy.

While the U.S. exerts significant pressure, Canada’s path forward lies in unity, strategic alliances, and a commitment to innovation. By embracing these principles, Canada can navigate the complexities of the trade conflict and emerge stronger and more resilient.

Thursday May 21, 2026

May 21, 2026 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday May 21, 2026

Also Published in The Toronto Star. Posted to Alberta Politics on Reddit.

Separatism’s Toxic Mix: Alberta’s Path to Nowhere

May 8, 2026

The separatist movement in Alberta, fuelled by a mix of far-right elements, threatens to overshadow the legitimate grievances of moderate Albertans. Figures like Mitch Sylvestre and David Parker have attracted anti-vaxxers, white nationalists, and MAGA enthusiasts, creating a coalition whose tactics and rhetoric are increasingly discrediting the movement.

The movement’s visible leaders have promoted anti-vaccine claims and nativist ideas, aligning themselves with conspiracy theories rather than constructive dialogue. This not only delegitimizes their cause but also alienates the broader Canadian public.

Opinion: Danielle Smith’s support for separation threatens proposed oil pipeline

November 12, 2025

Premier Danielle Smith, despite her denials, appears sympathetic to separatists. Her persistent support for a separation referendum, even in the face of judicial rulings declaring it unconstitutional, signals alignment with these fringe elements. Her dismissive response to Justice Shaina Leonard’s ruling against the referendum question only reinforces this perception.

Smith’s strategy jeopardizes Alberta’s economic future. As Gillian Steward pointed out in the Toronto Star, the separatist agenda threatens the proposed bitumen pipeline to B.C.’s coast. Investors are unlikely to commit to projects amid political instability fuelled by separation rhetoric.

Andrew Coyne has highlighted the dangers of allowing fringe elements to dictate Alberta’s political discourse. He rightly emphasizes the damage caused by blending legitimate grievances with extremist narratives, which only serves to alienate potential allies and solutions.

Opinion: Canada is one of history’s most successful countries. Here’s a look at who’s trying to destroy it, and how

January 13, 2025

Moderate Albertans must distance themselves from these extremists. As Peter Donolo noted, silence from federal MPs only exacerbates the issue. They must publicly repudiate the far-right elements, support judicial decisions, and refocus on constructive solutions to Alberta’s grievances.

Analysis: Why aren’t more Alberta MPs standing against separatism?

The separatist movement, tainted by extremist rhetoric and dubious tactics, is not the answer to Alberta’s challenges. Danielle Smith and other leaders must choose between pandering to fringe elements or pursuing genuine progress for Alberta. The choice is clear: reject extremism and embrace unity.

Saturday February 28, 2026

February 28, 2026 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday February 28, 2026

Poilievre’s Late Pivot and the Path Forward for Canadian Politics

March 15, 2025

Pierre Poilievre’s recent statement, “What President Trump says about Canada is wrong,” marks a significant shift in his political rhetoric, aligning with the general Canadian sentiment towards Trump. This statement, however, comes after months of growing public discontent, travel boycotts, and economic pushback against the U.S. It’s a reaction that feels overdue and perhaps insufficient in countering the bold vision laid out by Prime Minister Mark Carney, who has called for a reevaluation of Canada’s longstanding partnership with the U.S. and urged middle powers to unite against coercive hegemonic practices.

Poilievre’s new stance may ruffle feathers among “Maple MAGA” supporters within his party, such as Jamil Jivani, Danielle Smith, and Kevin O’Leary, who find Trump’s far-right movement appealing. Yet, this pivot is crucial as the Conservative Party seeks to align itself more closely with mainstream Canadian values.

News: Canada should not declare ‘permanent rupture’ with U.S., Poilievre says

April 2, 2025

The Conservative Leader’s attempt to present substantial policy positions and engage in adult discussions on national issues is commendable. However, the timing of his pivot raises questions about its sincerity, especially as Trump’s influence wanes even within his own party.

Poilievre’s speech displayed a level of political maturity that has been lacking in recent years. He acknowledged the opposition’s role in holding the government accountable and in fostering informed public discourse. This shift is a welcome development, yet it remains to be seen whether Poilievre can maintain this seriousness and authenticity.

While his new approach is a step in the right direction, it doesn’t entirely dispel the perception of him as untrustworthy. To truly resonate with Canadians, Poilievre must demonstrate consistent leadership and genuine commitment to these principles.

Opinion: Poilievre makes the pivot on Trump, but repudiates Carney’s foreign policy

October 17, 2025

Ultimately, Poilievre’s pivot, though late, represents a more responsible political strategy. As Canadians, we should watch closely to see if this new direction will lead to meaningful engagement with the challenges facing our country. Time will tell if Poilievre can grow into the leader his party and Canada need.

Friday October 17, 2025

October 17, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday October 17, 2025

Also published in The Toronto Star.

Canada’s D.E.I. Debate: Balancing Progress with Peril

April 2, 2025

The recent discourse surrounding diversity, equity, and inclusion (D.E.I.) in Canada has sparked concern among many Canadians. With political figures like Pierre Poilievre echoing rhetoric reminiscent of Donald Trump, there is growing unease about the implications for a nation celebrated for its multicultural identity.

As highlighted in The Toronto Star, Poilievre’s endorsement of a petition to end D.E.I. programs, framed as a restoration of the “merit principle,” raises critical questions. This stance, mirroring policies seen in the United States, poses a challenge to Canadians who value inclusivity and progress. The debate isn’t merely about D.E.I. itself; it’s about what the opposition to these initiatives signifies—a potential step backward in the journey towards a more inclusive society.

News: Diversity, equity and inclusion are coming under scrutiny — and Pierre Poilievre is ready to push the conversation

August 30, 2025

Reader comments from various articles reflect a range of perspectives. Some Canadians fear that dismantling D.E.I. initiatives could lead to increased bias and exclusion, similar to the cultural tensions observed south of the border. Others express skepticism about certain D.E.I. practices, viewing them as potentially unfair to groups like white, middle-aged, heterosexual individuals.

In this context, finding a balance is crucial. D.E.I. should aim to provide equal opportunities for all, without introducing new forms of disadvantage. The objective is not to replace one form of inequality with another but to ensure that everyone, regardless of background, has a fair chance.

Canada has long been proud of its mosaic of cultures, where diversity is celebrated. This identity is worth preserving. While legitimate debates about D.E.I. implementation are necessary, they should be approached with an understanding of Canada’s foundational values of acceptance and multiculturalism.

Opinion: Pierre Poilievre says he’d stand up to Donald Trump while taking a page from his playbook

August 21, 2025

The political rhetoric that seeks to polarize rather than unite is unlikely to resonate with the majority of Canadians, who generally reject the divisive tactics seen in other countries. As a society, it is crucial to safeguard the progress made and continue striving for an inclusive future that reflects the true spirit of Canada.

The conversation about D.E.I. in Canada should focus on constructive dialogue, aiming for policies that are fair and inclusive. It’s about moving forward together, acknowledging diverse experiences, and ensuring that everyone feels respected and valued. This is the Canada that many know and love, and it is the Canada that must continue to be nurtured.

Between Trump and True North

Since the April federal election, Pierre Poilievre has been under the spotlight, especially after the Conservative Party’s less-than-stellar performance. Even with a win in a prairie stronghold, he’s been on a sort of probation, with his leadership set for a vote in January. The buzz is that his tight alignment with Trump-like policies might have been a misstep. Normally, Canadian Conservatives and U.S. Republicans are on the same wavelength, but now that’s a bit tricky with Trump leading the charge. His administration’s policies, from the travel ban to tough immigration stances, have raised eyebrows and sparked debates over racism and intolerance. Poilievre, trying to reassure Canadians of his more progressive stance, has been careful to differentiate his views. Yet, his “Canada First” slogan did raise a few eyebrows, sounding a bit too close to “America First.” The real juggling act for Poilievre is keeping his conservative base happy while not straying too far from Canada’s inclusive values. It’s a balancing act that could keep him at the helm of the Conservatives, but he needs to ensure he’s in tune with a Canada that cherishes its diversity and inclusivity. On ditching DEI he’s not doing himself any favours and again it’s time to dust of the Maple Maga and Timbit Trump monikers.

More on this in my weekly review of editorial cartoons in my Saturday Newsletter, The Graeme Gallery.

Tuesday April 1, 2025

April 1, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday April 1, 2025

Poilievre’s Dilemma: Navigating Tariffs, Allegations, and ‘Maple MAGA

March 25, 2025

In the turbulent waters of Canadian politics, Pierre Poilievre finds himself at a crossroads. As U.S. President Donald Trump escalates trade tensions with his planned “Liberation Day” tariffs, the question looms large: Will Poilievre pivot his campaign to address the pressing economic threats posed by Trump, even at the risk of alienating his own supporters who admire the U.S. President?

The stakes are high. Canada’s auto industry, a cornerstone of the nation’s economy, stands on the precipice of significant disruption. Trump’s tariffs are not just economic measures; they are a direct challenge to Canada’s sovereignty and economic stability. Yet, while other political leaders have adjusted their focus to confront this threat, Poilievre’s campaign appears to remain steadfast on domestic issues, often characterized by attacks on the Liberal government and a notable reluctance to confront Trump head-on.

Analysis: Pressure mounts on Poilievre to refocus Conservative campaign on Donald Trump

March 15, 2025

This strategic choice raises critical questions about Poilievre’s leadership and vision for Canada. Is it enough to tell Trump to “knock it off,” when the very fabric of Canada’s economic future is at stake? Such a phrase, reminiscent of a reprimand to a misbehaving pet, falls short of addressing the gravity of the situation.

To his supporters, Poilievre is a champion of conservative values, a voice against high taxes and government overreach. Within his base are the “maple MAGA” supporters—those Canadian conservatives who find resonance with Trump’s policies and style. However, the current geopolitical landscape demands more than partisan rhetoric. It requires a leader who can transcend party lines, someone who can unify Canadians against an external threat that transcends political affiliations.

February 20, 2025

Yet, pivoting to confront Trump poses its own risks. By taking a firm stance against Trump, Poilievre risks alienating the “maple MAGA” segment of his supporters, potentially fracturing the party’s unity. This delicate balancing act is a test of Poilievre’s political acumen and courage.

News: Doug Ford’s internal polling paints grim election prospects for Pierre Poilievre in Ontario

January 9, 2025

Criticism from within conservative ranks adds another layer of complexity. Kory Teneycke, a key advisor to Ontario Premier Doug Ford, has been outspoken in his critique of Poilievre’s approach. Teneycke’s insights highlight the internal tensions within the conservative movement, where strategic focus and leadership direction are hotly contested. In a display of apparent desperation, the Conservative Party has resorted to mudslinging tactics, including promoting unfounded allegations linking Liberal leader Mark Carney to Ghislaine Maxwell and questioning the integrity of his doctoral thesis. These moves may underscore the pressures Poilievre faces as he navigates this challenging political landscape.

Analysis: Don’t fall for AI-generated image showing Canada’s PM Mark Carney, Ghislaine Maxwell and Tom Hanks

November 9 2024

Moreover, the strategic pivot required is not just about rhetoric. It involves presenting a clear, actionable plan to protect Canadian industries, to reassure workers whose livelihoods are at stake, and to articulate a vision of Canada that is resilient, independent, and forward-looking.

Poilievre’s challenge is to move beyond the negative strategies of attacking domestic political foes and to address the existential threat that Trump presents to Canadians. It is a moment for leadership that transcends the usual political playbook, demanding a response that is as bold and decisive as the challenges Canada faces.

As the election approaches, the choice for Poilievre is clear: Continue on the current path, or pivot with purpose and resolve. The latter could define his legacy as a leader capable of navigating Canada through one of its most significant economic and political challenges. Whether Poilievre will seize this moment remains to be seen, but with critical voices like Kory Teneycke urging a reevaluation, the opportunity for transformative leadership is undeniable.

Fiery Conservatives

Just wrapped up the editorial cartoon, and wow, it didn’t take long for the conspiracy theories to start swirling around Mark Carney during the first week of the election campaign! The mudslinging is in full swing, with the Conservatives trying to tie Carney to Ghislaine Maxwell through an AI-generated image. Even though it’s been debunked, and real photos show no real connection, some folks just can’t resist a juicy story, right?

And then there’s the plagiarism drama with Carney’s doctoral thesis. The National Post is pointing fingers, but Carney’s old Oxford supervisor has his back, calling the claims a big misunderstanding. It’s wild how these stories pop up so fast, almost like a sign of desperation. Guess when a campaign’s in trouble, the far-fetched stories and evil thoughts start to fly, and before you know it, enough gullible people are spreading the nonsense.

The crazy part is, these stories do stick around. Whether it’s Hillary Clinton supposedly running a pedophile ring or Justin Trudeau being the love child of Fidel Castro, they take on a life of their own, infecting soft-brained voters. Once these tales get going, it’s like trying to stop a runaway train.

But maybe, just maybe, voters are becoming more aware of the misinformation that’s becoming more pervasive with every election. Hopefully, over time, they’ve accumulated some street smarts to separate the real from the fake. Fingers crossed!

Enjoy the making of clip of my editorial cartoon for April 1, 2025, and if you haven’t, please subscribe:

YouTube animation: https://youtu.be/R31qSCSRMjg

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack