The Foreign Interference Inquiry – A Missed Opportunity for Action
January 28, 2025
As Canadians approach another federal election, concerns about foreign interference still hang over us, yet we lack clear answers. Despite the efforts put into the foreign interference inquiry and Justice Marie-Josée Hogue’s extensive report, we’re left asking the same questions since the 2021 election: What did the government know about foreign interference? When did they know it? And what actions were taken?
This inquiry, meant to protect our democracy, seems to have missed the mark in providing the answers and actions Canadians need. The report highlights some worrying attempts to influence politics, but it also criticizes the government for not taking the issue seriously enough or acting swiftly.
The recommendations—such as changing laws and improving how we handle misinformation—are good on paper but seem unlikely to be put into action before the election. With Parliament on hold until March and the ruling party caught up in a leadership race, there’s little momentum for making these changes.
The opposition parties, while outspoken, haven’t pushed hard enough to make these reforms happen quickly. This leaves us vulnerable to further interference as we head into the election.
June 13, 2023
Rather than sparking real change, the inquiry risks becoming just another exercise in going through the motions. The lack of straightforward answers and immediate actions from this report disappoints Canadians who expect real protection against foreign meddling in elections.
Without clear steps forward, we might face the next election with the same weaknesses as before. It’s crucial for both the government and opposition to make Justice Hogue’s recommendations a priority. Only then can we start to restore faith in our democratic processes and ensure foreign interference is dealt with effectively. Until that happens, Canadians are left shortchanged by an inquiry that promised more than it has delivered.
In my latest editorial drawing, I illustrate the frustratingly slow political response to foreign interference in Canada, a concern that has persisted for years. A prime example is the inquiry led by former Governor General David Johnston, who was tasked with addressing this issue but ultimately saw his reputation sullied when his efforts were dismissed. That seems like dog ages ago, doesn’t it?
In the drawing, a race unfolds between a snail, embodying Justice Hogue, who hands over a report titled “Recommendations,” and a turtle resembling Trudeau, who dismissively says, “Great, I’ll pass it to my successor.” Meanwhile, a hare, representing Pierre Poilievre, races ahead exclaiming, “Time for a carbon tax election!” This scene highlights the government’s aloofness and the opposition’s feigned outrage, while critical questions about foreign interference remain unanswered. The finish line, ominously marked “FINISH of Prorogation,” leads into a threatening mouth and forked tongue labelled “2025 Election” underscoring the risks of inaction as we approach the next federal campaign for Canadians’ votes.
Please enjoy the January 30, 2025 making-of animated editorial cartoon below. Posts come out every Saturday as I summarize the week that was in my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading now is regarded as a “note”, which is used to help compose my weekly posts and showcase the animated versions of my daily editorial cartoons. If you like my editorial cartoons and animations, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, if you haven’t already. A lot of work goes into these cartoons and commentary — Best of all, it’s free!
As Ontario Premier Doug Ford calls for an early election, the official narrative centres around seeking a “new mandate” to tackle potential tariffs from U.S. President Donald Trump. However, a closer examination reveals that this reasoning may be little more than a diversion from pressing issues at home.
A Convenient Distraction: The notion that Ford needs a new mandate to confront Trump’s tariff threats seems implausible. With a solid majority government and ample time left in his term, Ford already possesses the authority to advocate for Ontario’s interests. The urgency of an early election appears more aligned with domestic concerns, including his administration’s own fiscal missteps and political controversies.
Economic Mismanagement: Ford’s tenure has been marked by decisions that have strained Ontario’s finances. The cancellation of green energy projects, which cost taxpayers an estimated $231 million, is a glaring example of wasteful spending. The abrupt termination of these initiatives not only incurred financial losses but also stalled progress toward sustainable energy solutions.
Further compounding this issue is Ford’s elimination of revenue streams, such as the license plate renewal fees, and his distribution of $200 payouts to Ontarians. These actions, perceived as short-term voter appeasement, have left significant gaps in the province’s budget.
October 16, 2020
The EV Battery Gamble: In a bid to position Ontario as a leader in the electric vehicle supply chain, Ford has invested heavily in EV battery production. While this move aligns with global trends towards renewable energy, it faces potential risks from Trump’s opposition to green energy. The looming threat of tariffs on EV batteries could render these investments unprofitable, leaving Ontario with costly “white elephants.”
Political Vulnerabilities: Ford’s administration is not without its controversies. The RCMP’s ongoing investigation into the Greenbelt development decision, along with other allegations of favouritism and mismanagement, casts a long shadow over his leadership. By calling an early election, Ford may be attempting to secure another term before these issues reach a critical point.
A Strategic Move: With the Progressive Conservatives enjoying a sizable lead in the polls, Ford’s decision to call an early election is strategically sound. Capitalizing on the opposition’s relative obscurity and avoiding the potential fallout from economic and political challenges, Ford seeks to consolidate his power.
January 15, 2025
Trump’s tariffs provides a convenient narrative for Ford’s early election call, the underlying motives appear rooted in domestic concerns. The Premier’s track record of fiscal mismanagement and political controversies suggests a desire to divert attention and solidify his position before facing the consequences of his actions. Ontario voters must critically assess these motives as they head to the polls, ensuring that leadership is accountable and transparent in addressing the province’s challenges.
Doug Ford calling an early election might seem like it’s all about taking on the big, bad Trump and his tariff threats. But let’s be real—it’s probably more about avoiding pesky RCMP reports into Greenbelt corruption, and dodging messes he’s made with Ontario’s taxpayer money.
Ford’s been busy billing the people hefty fees for breaking booze and beer contracts, green energy projects, then coming up with his own green schemes; he’s been cutting off revenue streams, and throwing cash around like it grows on trees. Now, he’s trying to shift the spotlight onto Trump, who’s acting like Canada’s potential 51st state is just around the corner and throwing around tariff threats. All the while health care, affordable housing and Colleges are in crisis begging for attention.
Meanwhile, Canada’s federal government is caught up in its own drama, with the Liberals scrambling to replace an unpopular leader and planning their own election.
But back to Ontario. Ford’s election timing is pretty slick. The opposition isn’t exactly roaring right now. The Liberals, usually the main challengers, are stuck in third place with a new leader, Bonnie Crombie, who hasn’t had much time to flex her political muscles. Then there’s Marit Stiles, who’s also fresh to the scene. So, unless Ford trips over his shoelaces in a big way, he’s likely to keep his seat come election day on February 27.
Voter turnout wasn’t great last time, and it’s hard to see what’s going to get people more excited this year. Still, there’s a slice of the electorate that’s miffed about Ford’s spending habits and might see this whole Trump tariff thing as a smokescreen. Those voters want to see some accountability.
In the end, Ford might lose a few seats, but he’s probably not sweating a minority government. If he pulls this off, he’s got a runway till 2029 to keep doing his thing—whatever that might mean for Ontario’s wallet and future.
Please enjoy the January 28, 2024 making-of animated editorial cartoon below. Posts come out every Saturday as I summarize the week that was in my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading now is regarded as a “note”, which is used to help compose my weekly posts and showcase the animated versions of my daily editorial cartoons. If you like my editorial cartoons and animations, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, if you haven’t already. A lot of work goes into these cartoons and commentary — Best of all, it’s free!
Canada’s Political Landscape Amidst Foreign Meddling and Economic Pressures
June 12, 2024
In recent years, the investigation into foreign meddling in Canada has been a critical endeavour, aimed at safeguarding our democracy from covert influences by nations such as China, Russia, Iran, India, and Pakistan. This comprehensive inquiry, culminating in a final report, has uncovered a series of alarming activities that threaten the integrity of Canada’s political system.
China has been implicated in sophisticated espionage operations, employing cyber tactics to infiltrate Canadian political institutions. Allegations of interference in elections, along with harassment of Chinese-Canadian communities, underscore the pervasive nature of their influence.
Russia’s notorious disinformation campaigns have aimed to destabilize Western democracies, including Canada. Efforts to support specific political candidates and sow division through social media manipulation illustrate their broader strategy of influence. The presence of Russian double agents within Canadian institutions further complicates our security landscape.
Iran’s activities include targeted cyber attacks and harassment of Iranian-Canadian activists and politicians. These actions reflect the Iranian regime’s broader attempt to silence opposition voices abroad, extending their reach into Canada.
India faces accusations related to its handling of the Sikh diaspora in Canada, with allegations of surveillance and intimidation against those advocating for Sikh independence. Such actions have strained Canada-India relations, challenging Canada’s diplomatic balance.
Pakistan has been linked to efforts to influence Canadian politics through diaspora networks and espionage activities, highlighting the challenges of managing bilateral relations while safeguarding national security.
November 21, 2024
These activities are not merely abstract threats; they have tangible impacts on Canada’s political fabric. The presence of double agents, some of whom have held or currently hold positions within Canada’s Parliament, illustrates the potential for compromised decision-making at the highest levels. Incidents of harassment and assassination plots against politicians and activists add to the gravity of the situation.
However, just as we were poised to digest these findings, an overt foreign influence from an unexpected source has emerged, overshadowing this vital investigation. Since Donald Trump’s re-election victory in November 2024, Canada has faced an unprecedented challenge from our southern neighbour. His aggressive economic policies, particularly the imposition of tariffs on Canadian goods, have turned our political agenda on its head.
January 30, 2024
This shift in focus is most evident in the recent resignation of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. His departure has left a leadership vacuum at the federal level, triggering a Liberal leadership contest at a time when cohesive national strategy is desperately needed. With Trudeau’s absence, the federal government has struggled to maintain its previous commitments, including the abandonment of key initiatives like carbon pricing, as it scrambles to address the looming economic threat.
The gravity of the situation is underscored by Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s decision to call a snap election. Ford’s move, aimed at securing a mandate to counteract Trump’s tariffs, reflects the urgency with which provincial leaders are responding to these external pressures. The economic stakes are high, particularly for Ontario’s vital automotive sector, which stands to suffer significantly from U.S. policies.
Adding to the complexity of the geopolitical landscape, Canadian MP Charlie Angus has raised concerns about Elon Musk’s influence on social media platforms, particularly in relation to the spread of misinformation and its potential impact on Canadian democracy. Angus argues that Musk’s control over these digital spaces could further complicate efforts to maintain the integrity of Canada’s political discourse.
This convergence of events raises pressing questions about Canada’s ability to navigate both covert and overt foreign influences. While the findings of the foreign meddling investigation remain essential for long-term democratic resilience, the immediate economic threats from the U.S. require swift and decisive action.
As we stand at this crossroads, it is imperative for Canadian leaders to balance these dual challenges. Strengthening our defences against covert interference must go hand-in-hand with robust economic strategies to protect our national interests. Only by addressing both dimensions can Canada ensure its sovereignty and stability in an increasingly complex geopolitical landscape.
Grab your popcorn and settle in because the drama unfolding on Parliament Hill is nothing short of a monster movie extravaganza. Picture this: towering over our iconic Canadian Parliament buildings, two colossal beasts are wreaking havoc, and they’ve got everyone in a frenzy.
First off, meet “Trumpzilla.” With the body of Godzilla and the unmistakable head of Donald Trump, he’s spewing fiery tariffs and trade threats that are setting the very ground around the Centre Block ablaze. You can almost hear the panicked cries of politicians scrambling to deal with the chaos—it’s a sight to behold, and not in a good way.
In the backdrop, swinging from the Peace Tower, is “King Elon.” Think King Kong but with Elon Musk’s head, casually disrupting social media and technology like it’s just another day at the office. He’s the wildcard in this tale, adding another layer of complexity to this already tumultuous scene.
Now, you might be thinking, “What about the serious stuff?” Indeed, there’s a crucial investigation into foreign meddling by bad actor nations like China, Russia, Iran, India, and Pakistan. This report has been years in the making, uncovering alarming activities such as assassinations, harassment of politicians, and double agents who’ve infiltrated our Parliament. It’s a big deal, no doubt about it.
But here’s the kicker: while our focus should be on these covert threats, Trumpzilla has barged in, flipping our democracy on its head. Since his election win in November, he’s dominated our domestic agenda, creating a leadership vacuum with Justin Trudeau’s resignation and a Liberal leadership contest. Carbon pricing? Abandoned. The spotlight is now on handling the impending Trump tariffs, which promise to send shockwaves through our economy, potentially leading to a recession.
Even Doug Ford has jumped into the fray, calling an early provincial snap election in Ontario to secure a mandate to fight these tariffs. It’s a scene straight out of a political thriller, with politicians running around like chickens with their heads cut off.
So there you have it—a spectacle of monstrous proportions. While the final report on foreign interference is crucial, the immediate threat from our southern neighbour has taken centre stage, leaving us to ponder the lasting effects on our jobs, businesses, and overall economic stability.
Please enjoy the January 27, 2024 making-of animated editorial cartoon below. Posts come out every Saturday as I summarize the week that was in my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading now is regarded as a “note”, which is used to help compose my weekly posts and showcase the animated versions of my daily editorial cartoons. If you like my editorial cartoons and animations, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, if you haven’t already. A lot of work goes into these cartoons and commentary — Best of all, it’s free!
Canada’s Leadership Vacuum and the Price of Political Machinations
January 15, 2025
As Canada finds itself at a pivotal moment, grappling with international pressures and domestic challenges, there is an undeniable sense of stagnation and frustration.
With Parliament prorogued until March 25, the country is effectively on pause, waiting for the Liberal Party to select a new leader to replace Justin Trudeau. This leadership vacuum is not only delaying crucial decisions but also casting a shadow over the policies that have been the hallmark of the current government.
Justin Trudeau, once a dynamic force in Canadian politics, now appears to be more of a ceremonial figurehead, chairing meetings and facilitating discussions without the power to enact substantial change. His recent interactions with provincial premiers, who are arguably steering the national agenda in response to Donald Trump’s aggressive rhetoric, underscore the diminishing influence of the federal government. Trump’s threats of tariffs and even provocative suggestions about Canada becoming the 51st state have elevated the stakes, demanding robust leadership and decisive action.
Yet, instead of rallying Canadians to the polls for a national debate and a fresh mandate to confront these challenges, the Liberal leadership contest has taken precedence. This internal party struggle has sidelined pressing national issues, leaving Canadians without a clear direction. Doug Ford’s decision to send Ontario voters to the polls highlights a regional response to the national leadership void, seeking to secure a mandate amidst uncertainty.
The sidelining of carbon pricing—a hallmark of the Trudeau government’s climate policy—exemplifies how political motivations can overshadow good policy. Leadership hopefuls like Chrystia Freeland, Karina Gould, and Mark Carney are distancing themselves from consumer carbon pricing, a move that seems driven more by electoral strategy than sound environmental policy. Carbon pricing was not just a tax; it was a strategic initiative designed to incentivize greener practices and reduce carbon footprints, while simultaneously providing rebates to help offset costs for most Canadians. This policy was a critical part of Canada’s climate action framework, intending to balance economic growth with environmental responsibility.
December 20, 2024
The abandonment or softening of such policies reflects a troubling trend where political maneuvering takes precedence over long-term strategic goals. The candidates’ retreat from consumer carbon pricing appears to be an attempt to neutralize a potent Conservative critique, yet it risks undermining the credibility of the Liberal Party’s commitment to climate change mitigation.
This shift also highlights a broader issue within Canadian politics: the difficulty in sustaining complex, long-term policies amid changing political tides. Policies like carbon pricing require consistent public engagement and transparent communication to ensure their benefits are understood and appreciated. Without this, even the most well-intentioned policies can fall victim to political expediency.
As Canadians wait for new leadership, the focus must eventually return to addressing the pressing challenges facing the nation. This includes not only navigating international pressures but also reaffirming commitments to effective environmental policies and economic strategies that reflect the values and needs of Canadians.
Ultimately, the leadership vacuum and the current political maneuvering underscore the need for a renewed commitment to principled governance. Canada’s future depends on leaders who can transcend short-term political calculations and prioritize policies that ensure sustainable progress and resilience in the face of both domestic and global challenges. The path forward will require not just new leadership, but a reinvigorated approach to policy that places the long-term wellbeing of Canadians and the environment at its core.
With the carbon tax facing backlash, Liberal leadership candidates are quickly distancing themselves from Trudeau’s policies. Even Steven Guilbeault seems to be stepping back, while Pierre Poilievre may struggle to paint the Liberals as the villains when they’re ditching unpopular policies.
And then there’s Chrystia Freeland. Her dramatic resignation before the Fall economic update raises eyebrows about her loyalty to Trudeau. If she were to lead, we could see a shake-up, especially if she scraps proposed capital gains tax changes, changes she actually proposed in the Fall economic update.
Consumer carbon pricing, once a key part of the government’s legacy, is being sidelined, and it’s frustrating to see good principled policy sacrificed for political games. With Parliament prorogued until March 25, it feels like Trudeau is just a figurehead, while provincial leaders scramble to address pressing challenges—especially with Trump’s rhetoric looming over us.
Please enjoy the making of my January 25 editorial cartoon.https://youtu.be/oPAUz8CjF5s
Doug Ford’s Call for a Mandate is a Diversion, Not a Solution
Young Doug Ford: The Series
In the wake of President-elect Donald Trump’s provocative rhetoric about using “economic force” against Canada, Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s call for a new mandate to tackle potential U.S. tariffs seems less about addressing genuine economic challenges and more about diverting attention from his government’s shortcomings.
His concept of “Fortress Am-Can” emerges as a notable, albeit gimmicky, initiative by Ontario Premier Doug Ford. This catchy moniker is intended to symbolize a robust economic alliance with the United States, aiming to fortify trade relations while addressing potential external threats. While the name conjures images of impenetrable economic strength, critics might argue that it serves more as a rhetorical flourish than a concrete policy framework, highlighting the complexities and challenges inherent in truly integrating cross-border economic strategies with domestic priorities. It’s has yet to be seen if the moniker goes anywhere.
January 17, 2025
The proposed 25% tariffs on Canadian goods by Trump present a significant economic threat, but framing an election as the solution is misleading. At a time when the Canadian economy needs strategic, collaborative responses, Ford’s focus on securing political capital is a distraction from more pressing and actionable solutions.
For one, Canada must urgently diversify its trading relationships. Reliance on the U.S. leaves Canada vulnerable to the whims of American policy shifts. By expanding trade ties with Europe, Asia, and other global markets, Canada can bolster its economic resilience and reduce dependency on a single partner.
Moreover, the real opportunity for economic strengthening lies within our borders. Interprovincial trade barriers in Canada are a self-imposed obstacle that stifles economic potential. These barriers, in the form of differing regulations and standards, create inefficiencies and restrict the free flow of goods, services, and labor. Addressing these would not only enhance domestic productivity but also prepare Canada to better withstand external economic pressures.
Meanwhile, Ford’s government faces significant domestic challenges, particularly in healthcare and housing. Ontario’s healthcare system is under strain, with long wait times and resource shortages affecting patient care. The housing crisis continues to escalate, with affordability and availability issues persisting across the province. These are critical areas that demand focused attention and effective policy solutions, yet they seem overshadowed by the political theater of an unnecessary electoral mandate.
In essence, Ford’s election call seems more a maneuver to consolidate power rather than a genuine effort to address the economic challenges posed by U.S. tariffs. What Canada truly needs is strategic leadership that prioritizes internal economic reforms and external diversification. By focusing on these substantive issues, Canadian leaders can enhance national resilience and secure a more stable economic future.
The path forward requires vision and collaboration, not electoral distractions. It’s time to move beyond political posturing and focus on the real work needed to strengthen Canada’s economy from within.
Interprovincial trade barriers might not be the most sexy topic, but they could be the secret weapon Canada needs to counteract the financial strain from U.S. tariffs. These barriers have been a thorn in Canada’s side since Confederation, and while they don’t grab headlines, tackling them could make a real difference.
When a tariff crisis hits, it’s tempting for politicians to make a big show of calling elections and casting tariffs as the villain. Yet the real challenge—and opportunity—lies in bringing provinces together to break down these old trade walls.
“Economic force”, as Donald Trump has called it, in the form of tariffs, would mean trouble for consumers on both sides of the border, leading to job losses and economic pain. Canada, being the smaller player, will ultimately suffer more in this exchange.
To strengthen its position, Canada should look beyond North America and build trade relationships with friendlier markets. At the same time, cutting through the red tape of interprovincial trade is a crucial, though often overlooked, move that could boost the economy.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s call for an election in response to tariffs seems more like political theatre than a real solution. He’s learned from the great Guru of distraction who’s the new leader down south. An election diverts attention from RCMP investigations and urgent issues like healthcare and housing that need urgent fixing. Instead of playing games, Canada needs to focus on real change: diversifying trade and tearing down those internal trade barriers. By doing so, Canada can stand stronger and more independently, ready to face whatever comes its way.
But no, Dougie Ford has to revert to his teen brain and thrust us into a provincial election.
Please enjoy the January 23, 2024 making-of animated editorial cartoon below. Posts come out every Saturday as I summarize the week that was in my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading now is regarded as a “note”, which is used to help compose my weekly posts and showcase the animated versions of my daily editorial cartoons. If you like my editorial cartoons and animations, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, if you haven’t already. A lot of work goes into these cartoons and commentary — Best of all, it’s free!
