government – mackaycartoons

Thursday January 30, 2025

January 30, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

January 30, 2025

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday January 30, 2025, and The Toronto Star

The Foreign Interference Inquiry – A Missed Opportunity for Action

January 28, 2025

As Canadians approach another federal election, concerns about foreign interference still hang over us, yet we lack clear answers. Despite the efforts put into the foreign interference inquiry and Justice Marie-Josée Hogue’s extensive report, we’re left asking the same questions since the 2021 election: What did the government know about foreign interference? When did they know it? And what actions were taken?

This inquiry, meant to protect our democracy, seems to have missed the mark in providing the answers and actions Canadians need. The report highlights some worrying attempts to influence politics, but it also criticizes the government for not taking the issue seriously enough or acting swiftly.

News: Five takeaways from the foreign-interference inquiry

August 2, 2024

The recommendations—such as changing laws and improving how we handle misinformation—are good on paper but seem unlikely to be put into action before the election. With Parliament on hold until March and the ruling party caught up in a leadership race, there’s little momentum for making these changes.

The opposition parties, while outspoken, haven’t pushed hard enough to make these reforms happen quickly. This leaves us vulnerable to further interference as we head into the election.

June 13, 2023

Rather than sparking real change, the inquiry risks becoming just another exercise in going through the motions. The lack of straightforward answers and immediate actions from this report disappoints Canadians who expect real protection against foreign meddling in elections.

Without clear steps forward, we might face the next election with the same weaknesses as before. It’s crucial for both the government and opposition to make Justice Hogue’s recommendations a priority. Only then can we start to restore faith in our democratic processes and ensure foreign interference is dealt with effectively. Until that happens, Canadians are left shortchanged by an inquiry that promised more than it has delivered.

In my latest editorial drawing, I illustrate the frustratingly slow political response to foreign interference in Canada, a concern that has persisted for years. A prime example is the inquiry led by former Governor General David Johnston, who was tasked with addressing this issue but ultimately saw his reputation sullied when his efforts were dismissed. That seems like dog ages ago, doesn’t it?

In the drawing, a race unfolds between a snail, embodying Justice Hogue, who hands over a report titled “Recommendations,” and a turtle resembling Trudeau, who dismissively says, “Great, I’ll pass it to my successor.” Meanwhile, a hare, representing Pierre Poilievre, races ahead exclaiming, “Time for a carbon tax election!” This scene highlights the government’s aloofness and the opposition’s feigned outrage, while critical questions about foreign interference remain unanswered. The finish line, ominously marked “FINISH of Prorogation,” leads into a threatening mouth and forked tongue labelled “2025 Election” underscoring the risks of inaction as we approach the next federal campaign for Canadians’ votes.

Please enjoy the January 30, 2025 making-of animated editorial cartoon below. Posts come out every Saturday as I summarize the week that was in my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading now is regarded as a “note”, which is used to help compose my weekly posts and showcase the animated versions of my daily editorial cartoons. If you like my editorial cartoons and animations, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, if you haven’t already. A lot of work goes into these cartoons and commentary — Best of all, it’s free!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Thursday April 11, 2024

April 11, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday April 11, 2024

The Struggles of The Middle-Income as the Economic Engine

October 26, 2023

In light of the recent decision by the Bank of Canada to maintain interest rates at 5%, it’s crucial to examine the profound impact this has on the struggles faced by middle-income people and families, who often serve as the backbone of our economy. This decision reflects broader economic realities that disproportionately affect ordinary households, exacerbating existing challenges and highlighting the crucial role of middle income working people as an economic engine.

The middle class play a vital role in driving economic activity, fuelling consumption, and sustaining businesses through their spending habits and contributions to the workforce. However, they often bear the brunt of economic policies and decisions, particularly in an environment of stagnant wages and rising costs of living.

News: Bank of Canada to Hold as It Debates When to Start Easing Rates

September 8, 2023

One of the primary concerns for these households is the impact of sustained high interest rates set by central banks like the Bank of Canada. While these rates are intended to manage inflation and maintain economic stability, they can inadvertently burden households with higher borrowing costs, particularly for mortgages, loans, and credit card debt. This strain on disposable income can limit the ability of middle-income families to save, invest, or adequately cover essential expenses.

Moreover, middle-income families face persistent challenges in accessing affordable housing, managing healthcare costs, and ensuring quality education for their children. The decision to maintain higher interest rates adds an additional layer of financial pressure, making it harder for families to achieve financial security and upward mobility.

July 18, 2023

In the context of the Bank of Canada’s decision, it’s essential to recognize that the middle class are not only affected by interest rates but also by broader economic trends such as job market dynamics, globalization, and technological advancements. These factors can contribute to income inequality and precarious employment conditions, further undermining the financial well-being of households.

To address these challenges, policymakers must prioritize policies that support and empower middle-income families. This includes targeted measures to enhance income growth, improve access to affordable housing, and provide adequate social safety nets. Additionally, there is a need for greater transparency and accountability in monetary policy decisions to ensure they align with the interests of everyday Canadians.

Opinion: As the Bank of Canada resists cutting interest rates, is it falling behind the curve again?

March 27, 2023

Ultimately, the struggles faced by middle-income families underscore the urgency of adopting holistic economic policies that prioritize inclusive growth and address systemic barriers to prosperity. As we navigate the complexities of our economic landscape, let us remember that a thriving middle class is not only a measure of economic success but also a reflection of societal well-being and resilience.

The decision by the Bank of Canada to maintain interest rates at 5% highlights the ongoing challenges faced by the middle class as the true economic engine of our society. It is imperative that we advocate for policies that promote economic fairness and opportunity for all, ensuring that middle-income families can continue to fulfill their vital role in driving sustainable and equitable growth. (AI)

Friday January 5, 2024

January 5, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday January 5, 2024

Small Businesses on the Brink

Saturday October 23, 2021

In the wake of the economic challenges brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, small businesses across the nation are teetering on the edge of insolvency, caught in the crossfire of the federal government’s unwillingness to adapt measures amid rising interest rates and inflation. The latest data from a December 2023 survey conducted by a national business association paints a dire picture of the Canadian business landscape.

Approximately 34% of business owners have successfully repaid their Canadian Emergency Business Account (CEBA) loans, a lifeline provided during the darkest days of the pandemic. However, a concerning 23% of owners find themselves unable to make any payment, revealing the harsh reality faced by a significant portion of the small business community.

The Canadian Federation of Independent Business’s media relations officer, Dariya Baiguzhiyeva, emphasizes the looming threat, stating that 40% of business owners are at risk of missing the current payment deadline of January 2024. A staggering 250,000 small businesses nationwide, with 96,000 located in Ontario alone, are at risk of closure if the CEBA deadline isn’t extended.

News: Hamilton Liberal MP says no CEBA extension on business loans is proposed

November 17, 2023

Despite these distress signals, Hamilton Liberal MP and cabinet minister Filomena Tassi remains resolute in the government’s decision not to provide another extension on CEBA loans. Tassi argues that three extensions have already been granted, and the government has offered unprecedented support, asserting that small businesses still have options.

However, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, representing over 280 industry associations, begs to differ. In a July open letter to Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland, they pleaded for an extension of the CEBA repayment deadline to the end of 2025, or at least by one year. The letter emphasizes that many businesses had no choice but to take on the loan due to circumstances beyond their control.

Failure to extend the deadline carries severe consequences for businesses unable to repay their loans, as they stand to lose access to the forgivable portion of up to $20,000, exacerbating their already burdensome debt loads.

February 10, 2021

Hamilton Centre NDP MP Matthew Green echoes the sentiment that the federal government is favouring large corporations over small businesses and non-profits, who have borne the brunt of the global pandemic and the subsequent cost-of-living crisis. Green calls on the Liberal government to prioritize and support small businesses in Hamilton as they navigate the challenges ahead.

The reluctance to extend CEBA’s deadline raises serious concerns about the government’s commitment to sustaining the backbone of our economy—small businesses. As interest rates and inflation rise, the federal government must reconsider its stance and provide the necessary support to prevent a wave of small business closures and the resulting economic fallout. The cost of inaction may prove far greater than the $907 million estimated by the parliamentary budget office, as countless businesses face an uncertain future, hanging by a thread over the precipice of insolvency. (AI)

Tuesday August 29, 2023

August 29, 2023 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday August 29, 2023

Neglecting Affordable Housing: Trudeau Government’s Misplaced Priorities

August 22, 2023

In recent years, the Trudeau government has positioned itself as a champion of progressive values, focusing on laudable issues such as climate crisis, inclusivity, cannabis legalization, indigenous reconciliation, and more. While these topics deserve attention, it’s imperative to acknowledge that the government’s priorities have been severely misplaced. The most glaring omission from their agenda is the affordable housing crisis that is festering across Canada.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s assertion that “housing isn’t a primary federal responsibility” is not only inaccurate, but it also reflects a disregard for the pressing issue at hand. Recent polls indicating that 70 percent of Canadians believe the government is inadequately addressing the housing crisis should serve as a wake-up call. While the term “housing” might not be explicitly mentioned in constitutional documents, the right to “life, liberty, and security of the person” as well as “equal protection” cannot be fulfilled without access to adequate housing.

Opinion: Sean Fraser is the new federal housing minister. He can’t waste any time acting on the affordability crisis

July 28, 2023

Canada’s commitment to enforce the right to housing, as established in various international covenants, was enshrined in Canadian law in 2019. Despite this commitment, the federal government has chosen to evade its responsibility, engaging in the very behaviors they accuse other levels of government of. This is exemplified by the government’s handling of refugee claimants in Toronto, a situation marked by ambiguity, turf guarding, buck passing, and finger pointing.

The federal government’s historic involvement in housing has been conveniently forgotten. Following World War II, Canada saw the creation of a million low-cost Victory Houses, an achievement made possible through government land, direct grants, and efficient production methods. From the 1960s to the 1980s, a significant portion of new construction comprised non-market housing, supported by federal land, grants, and financing partnerships with provincial and municipal governments.

July 21, 2023

However, the decline of non-market housing began in 1992 when the federal government shifted the responsibility for affordable housing to provinces. Federal spending on affordable housing also decreased significantly after this shift. The subsequent reduction in private rental construction further exacerbated the housing crisis, following a cutback on taxation incentives in 1972.

The consequences of these neglectful actions are evident in the alarming statistic that the average Canadian home now costs 8.8 times the average income. In cities like Toronto and Vancouver, these numbers reach staggering levels of 13.2 and 14.4 times, respectively. As for rental housing, the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation estimates a need for nearly six million new homes by 2030, a rate three times higher than current construction levels.

June 9, 2023

While the Trudeau government boasts of its commitment to tackle the housing crisis, its actions reveal a stark contrast. Cabinet meetings have been convened, experts consulted, and rhetoric repeated, yet tangible solutions remain elusive. The government’s lack of response has left Canadians struggling with intense housing challenges, further exacerbating the already palpable cost of living concerns.

The refusal to consider a national summit on housing is a testament to the government’s misplaced priorities. The urgency for national leadership is undeniable, and the federal government is uniquely positioned to provide this leadership. While addressing issues like climate change and inclusivity is important, they should not come at the expense of solving a crisis that directly impacts the basic well-being of Canadians.

August 26, 2021

Prime Minister Trudeau’s assertion that Canadians want hope and leadership holds true. However, hope cannot be sustained if pressing concerns such as affordable housing are ignored. As the government grapples with its political standing, it must acknowledge that addressing the housing crisis is not just a political imperative but a moral obligation. Failure to act decisively on this front risks further eroding public trust and will inevitably have lasting consequences for both the government and the Canadian population. (AI) | Editorial cartoon published in the Hamilton Spectator.

Friday June 10, 2022

June 10, 2022 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday June 10, 2022

Easier to use than lose the monarchy

June 11, 2016

The Queen’s Platinum Jubilee celebrations have come and gone in this country without a lot of the Canadian public even realizing they were ever even here. In the United Kingdom, a four-day feel-good holiday saw 2,000 street parties, rock concerts and thousands of jubilant Brits cheering the monarch outside Buckingham Palace. Our Commonwealth cousins, the Australians, enthusiastically kicked up their heels in four days of festivities, too, as landmarks across their antipodean nation were bathed in royal-purple lights, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese lit a special Commonwealth beacon and an island was renamed in Elizabeth’s honour. But in Canada, the loudest sounds came from crickets.

The best you can say about the federal government’s underwhelming response is that it was a foolproof cure for insomnia. Yes, there was a three-day whirlwind tour in May of Prince Charles and Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, that saw them stop in Newfoundland and Labrador, Ottawa and the Northwest Territories but, strangely, get nowhere near any of the country’s very biggest cities. Ho hum. If the government had deliberately set out to stage a mainly invisible non-event, it could not have succeeded better, something John Fraser, of the Institute for the Study of the Crown in Canada called “embarrassing.”

July 11, 2020

Fraser may be in the minority. An Angus Reid poll from April reported that 51 per cent of respondents oppose this country continuing as a constitutional monarchy, though most by far personally admired the Queen. Yet despite such ambivalent views, there are strong reasons to conclude Canada just missed out on several nationally-unifying opportunities. First — and whatever the future holds for the Canadian Crown — we squandered the chance to properly commemorate Elizabeth’s extraordinary achievement of being the longest reigning monarch in not just British but Canadian history. It was an ungenerous move on Ottawa’s part.

The beating heart of this jubilee is a woman who has committed her life to public service since 1952 and continues to make a few public appearances at the age of 96. As Canada’s head of state, she has done everything this country has asked of her for 70 years, ever since Louis St. Laurent was prime minister. To be sure, Canada has changed phenomenally since she ascended the throne; but she remains a living symbol of our shared traditions and values as well as a cornerstone of Canadian democracy.

January 13, 2020

That brings us to Point 2: Had Ottawa marked this jubilee with more than indifference it could have reminded Canadians that we remain a constitutional monarchy. The Crown is embedded in the warp and woof of our political fabric and speaks to the deliberate division between our Head of State (the Queen) and the head of government (Justin Trudeau). Power, legally speaking, resides in the Crown even though the Queen and her representative, the Governor General, use it rarely and only in urgent situations. But while the PM and his government wield the power, they do so only with House of Commons majority support. They are ephemeral. The Crown is permanent, or at least it has been throughout the 155 years of Canadian Confederation.

Time, of course, frays many traditional bonds. And with the ongoing reckoning with a colonial past that too often devastated Indigenous Peoples, the old bonds, symbols and ways are increasingly being questioned and, in some cases, tossed. But those who would criticize the monarchy in this country face an uphill slog if they want to dump it. For starters, we’d have to decide what should replace the monarchy. Do we elect a governor general in a nationwide vote? Sounds complicated. How about a republic, with an all-powerful president as head of state — someone who might turn out to be a Donald Trump? Oops.

July 24, 2019

And even if someone came up with a reasonable alternative, divesting ourselves of the Crown could never happen without the approval of the House of Commons, Senate, and every provincial legislature. That constitutional bar’s almost impossible to clear. And remember: When the changes proposed in the Meech Lake accord failed to achieve this in the 1990s, the result was a national unity crisis, a near-miss for Quebec separation and the destruction of the old Progressive Conservative party. Want to dance through this mine field again?

As a respected and, in some quarters, beloved monarch heads into her final years, perhaps we should have these discussions. But people should speak up with their eyes wide open. A little clear foresight might convince us to find new ways to use the Canadian monarchy rather than try to lose it. (Hamilton Spectator Editorial)