MacKay - Canadian Editorial Cartoons
mackaycartoons

Graeme MacKay's Editorial Cartoon Archive

  • Who?
  • Copyright
  • Boutique
  • Kings & Queens
  • Prime Ministers
  • Presidents
  • The French Monarchy Project
  • DOWNLOADS

Ayatollah

Thursday August 13 2026

August 13, 2026 by Graeme MacKay Leave a Comment

Amid escalating tensions with Iran and Canada, President Trump’s economic strategies risk backfiring, highlighting the power of strategic patience and leverage.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday August 13 2026

Strait Talk: Iran’s Leverage and Canada’s Counterplay

Reckless rhetoric and weak agreements between the U.S. and Iran have heightened tensions and economic instability in the Persian Gulf.

July 10, 2026

As the U.S. faces escalating tensions with both Iran and Canada, President Trump’s strategies reveal a pattern of economic brinkmanship that risks backfiring on multiple fronts. The parallels between his military blunder in Iran and the tariff threats against Canada offer crucial lessons for policymakers and observers alike.

News: Canada’s top negotiator told U.S. counterparts Aug. 19 tariffs could halt trade talks, sources say 

Iran’s resilience in the face of U.S. aggression has become a symbolic victory. Despite severe economic sanctions and military pressure, Iran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz gives it leverage to disrupt global supply chains, driving up inflation and trapping the U.S. in a costly conflict with no clear win in sight. Trump’s pivot back to sanctions after military strategies fizzled shows a lack of coherent objectives and exposes vulnerabilities in the U.S. approach.

Trump's rhetoric targets powerful women and foreign leaders, complicating diplomacy and highlighting gender biases.

August 8, 2026

In the trade war with Canada, the stakes are different but equally significant. Trump’s tariffs, set to take effect on August 19, threaten to increase U.S. inflation at a time when affordability is a critical election issue. Most Americans, if aware, oppose tariffs and have little appetite for aggression towards a longstanding ally. Just as Iran can leverage its strategic position, Canada holds critical economic cards: its exports are deeply embedded in U.S. supply chains, and retaliatory measures can exacerbate American economic pain.

Analysis: Lessons from Trump’s Iran Deal for Canada’s CUSMA Negotiators

Trump's unilateral Iran deal weakens U.S. influence, emboldens Tehran, and highlights the need for strategic oversight in presidential decision-making.

June 18, 2026

For both Iran and Canada, the strategy is survival. Enduring short-term punishment while leveraging their positions can make the pre-conflict status quo the best escape route for Trump. In Canada’s case, targeted counter-measures can amplify U.S. inflationary pressures and make the tariffs politically untenable. Trump’s insistence on aggressive tactics without clear goals leaves him vulnerable to the very economic disruptions he seeks to impose on others.

Trump’s domestic constraints are evident. The Iran conflict has depleted military resources and raised fuel prices, and further economic coercion against Canada could alienate voters already weary of inflation and trade wars. With the November elections looming, these pressures could force Trump to reconsider his aggressive stance.

News: Trump pivots back to sanctions for Iran as other strategies to end his war fizzle

The Canadian booze ban symbolizes national resistance against U.S. tariffs and disrespect, with potential for more drastic measures if tensions escalate.

August 11 2026

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s approach should be resolute: if Trump pushes further tariffs, Canada should respond firmly, leveraging its economic interdependence with the U.S. to press for a return to the pre-conflict status quo. Just as Iran’s resilience has shifted the narrative in its favour, Canada’s strategic patience and targeted responses can shape a more favourable outcome. In this high-stakes game, survival and strategic leverage are the keys to success.

The cartoon depicts a scene where Donald Trump is sprawled on the ground. A figure representing the Islamic regime of Iran, labeled “Strait of Hormuz,” is firmly holding one of Trump’s legs. This figure has a stern expression and is suggesting to Mark Carney, who represents Canada and stands nearby, to grab the other leg. Carney is looking on with a contemplative expression. Trump is clutching a paper that reads “August 19th Tariffs on Canada.” The cartoon highlights the leverage and strategic pressures both Iran and Canada exert on Trump amidst geopolitical tensions.

Posted in: Canada Tagged: Ayatollah, Canada, Donald Trump, inflation, Iran, leverage, Mark Carney, resilience, Strait of Hormuz, strategy, tariffs, USA

Thursday June 18, 2026

June 18, 2026 by Graeme MacKay

Trump's unilateral Iran deal weakens U.S. influence, emboldens Tehran, and highlights the need for strategic oversight in presidential decision-making.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday June 18, 2026

Also published to Counterpoint. Printed in The Toronto Star. 

Trump’s Impulsive Iran Misstep: A Strategic Blunder

Amidst global skepticism, Trump's theatrical power play collides with a fragile peace proposal as he faces wary G7 leaders.

June 16, 2026

The recent U.S.-Iran deal is a stark reminder of the consequences of leadership driven by impulse rather than strategy. This agreement, hastily reached and fraught with concessions, represents a significant strategic misstep with far-reaching implications for both regional stability and global perceptions of American strength.

Iran’s newfound control over the Strait of Hormuz is a testament to its strategic triumph. The deal allows Iran to levy fees on this vital shipping lane, reinforcing its leverage over global energy markets. This concession, highlighted in Roger Boyes’ and Bret Stephens’ critiques, signals a troubling acquiescence to Iranian demands without securing tangible limits on their nuclear ambitions or proxy activities.

Opinion: Peace in Iran will be messy and dangerous

Trump’s unpredictable threats nearly triggered war with Iran, leaving global leaders scrambling to manage the fallout.

April 9, 2026

President Trump’s decision-making process, bypassing congressional oversight and sidelining expert guidance, has led to a precarious peace. As Andrew Coyne aptly notes, this lack of consultation extends to neglecting the insights of American allies. Such unilateral action undermines collaborative security efforts and leaves allies questioning the reliability of U.S. commitments.

The economic ramifications of this agreement are undeniable. The disruption in oil markets and the ensuing instability have upended economies worldwide. Moreover, the human cost—needless deaths and the suffering of Iranian civilians under a regime now emboldened by perceived victories—cannot be ignored. Reader comments echo the sentiment that this deal prioritizes strategic concessions over humanitarian concerns.

Opinion: Trump’s Iran deal is a national humiliation

Trump's extreme threats towards Iran mirror ancient conqueror fantasies, risking global stability.

April 8, 2026

Perhaps most damaging is the erosion of America’s global reputation. Trump’s reliance on “gut feelings” over informed strategy has diminished U.S. standing, as Stephens highlights. The world watches as a superpower struggles to assert its influence, learning once again the perils of a foreign policy led by erratic impulses.

This debacle serves as a critical lesson: the need for robust guardrails around presidential power. It is imperative to implement mechanisms that ensure strategic coherence, expert consultation, and international collaboration in decision-making processes. The unchecked actions of a megalomaniac president must not dictate the course of global security.

Opinion: Iran Found Trump’s Bone Spur

Donald Trump prioritizes self-glorification over urgent global and domestic crises.

April 24, 2026

As the dust settles, it is crucial that the U.S. reflects on this strategic misstep, reaffirming its commitment to principled leadership and the safeguarding of democratic processes. Only then can it hope to restore its stature and effectively navigate the complexities of global diplomacy.

 

Posted in: International Tagged: Arc de Triomph, Arc de Trump, Ayatollah, Donald Trump, peace deal, peace plan, Strait of Hormuz, USA, war, Washington D.C

Friday March 13, 2026

March 13, 2026 by Graeme MacKay
Iran's blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a response to Trump's reckless attack, disrupts global oil markets and highlights the perils of unilateralism.

March 13, 2026

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday March 13, 2026

Also published in The Toronto Star. 

Strait of Uncertainty: Trump’s Gamble Backfires

The Iran conflict exposes the uncontrollable power of oil prices and the risks of impulsive leadership lacking strategic guidance.

March 11, 2026

The recent unilateral attack on Iran by the United States and Israel, led by President Donald Trump, has set off a chain reaction with dire global repercussions. The Iranian response to blockade the Strait of Hormuz, a critical artery for global oil supply, exemplifies the peril of Trump’s impulsive and unplanned foreign policy.

Iran’s decision to block the Strait of Hormuz is a strategic move that exploits its geographic advantage, directly targeting the global oil market. This blockade has sent oil prices spiralling, creating volatility that affects consumers worldwide. While oil investors may see short-term gains, the long-term consequences are severe. Consumers, especially those reliant on fossil fuels, face rising costs, exacerbating an already challenging cost of living crisis.

Opinion: Trump’s risky moves lead to escalating tensions with Iran

The Trump administration's bold geopolitical strategies in Iran and Venezuela challenge international norms, creating global tensions and uncertain outcomes.

January 10, 2026

The attack, which lacked a clear objective beyond demonstrating military might, has only strengthened Iran’s resolve. The removal of senior Iranian leaders has paved the way for hardliners to consolidate power, galvanizing resistance rather than yielding submission. Iran’s strategic response underscores its understanding that it cannot win a conventional military confrontation, but it can wield significant economic influence.

The blockade disrupts a delicate balance in the Gulf region, causing ripple effects throughout the global economy. Higher oil prices contribute to inflation, impacting everything from transportation to food production. This economic strain is felt most acutely by ordinary consumers, while oligarchs, benefitting from Trump’s policies, remain insulated.

News: Iran war punctures Trump’s ‘drill, baby, drill’ promise on US gas prices, experts say

May 11, 2018

This situation reveals the inherent instability in Trump’s “drill, baby, drill” approach, which prioritizes fossil fuel expansion over renewable energy and efficiency. A transition towards sustainable energy sources would mitigate such vulnerabilities, reducing reliance on a volatile global oil market.

Iran’s blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is a testament to the consequences of reckless leadership and the absence of a coherent strategy. It highlights the need for a more thoughtful and multilateral approach to international relations. This crisis should serve as a wake-up call, urging policymakers to reassess priorities, embrace energy diversification, and work collaboratively to ensure global stability.
The time for unilateral actions and short-sighted policies must end. The world deserves leadership that prioritizes peace, sustainability, and the well-being of all its citizens.

 

Posted in: International, USA Tagged: 2026-09, Ayatollah, blockade, diplomacy, Donald Trump, Economy, energy, Hormuz, Iran, Marco Rubio, oil, Persian Gulf, Pete Hegseth, prices, RFK jr., Strait

Tuesday December 10, 2024

December 10, 2024 by Graeme MacKay
The fall of Assad’s regime in Syria marks a crushing blow to Putin and Iran, stripping them of a key ally and undermining their influence in the Middle East.

December 10, 2024

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday December 10, 2024

The Fall of Assad—A Milestone with Challenges Ahead

June 14, 2000

The end of Bashar al-Assad’s rule in Syria marks the fall of one of the most brutal and kleptocratic regimes in modern history. For decades, Assad maintained power through violence, corruption, and fear, overseeing a system that prioritized personal enrichment and oligarchic control while Syria’s people endured economic stagnation and political repression. His crimes against humanity include some of the darkest chapters of the 21st century. Chief among them was the use of sarin gas in Ghouta in 2013, which killed over 1,400 civilians, including hundreds of children, and similar chemical attacks in Douma and other towns. These atrocities, along with systematic torture, extrajudicial killings, and targeting of civilian infrastructure, demand that Assad be brought to justice at The Hague.

Putin and Iran are using the Israel-Palestine crisis to divert attention from Russia's Ukraine invasion and undermine the West by supporting Hamas and spreading anti-Western disinformation.

October 20, 2023

The fall of Assad’s regime should be a moment of hope for the Syrian people and the world. It eliminates a linchpin of regional instability and weakens the axis of Iran and Russia, both of whom propped up Assad to extend their influence and wage proxy wars. Tehran and Moscow now face significant setbacks, as Syria’s descent into chaos was a crucial element of their geopolitical strategies. The loss of a loyal ally also strains their broader plans to undermine Western influence and protect their regional interests.

News: From Trump and Turkey, to Russia and Iran — Syria’s regime change has huge global consequences

August 24, 2011

Yet optimism is tempered by the lessons of recent history. The fall of other autocrats—such as Muammar Gaddafi in Libya and Ali Abdullah Saleh in Yemen—has shown that the end of tyranny often leads not to peace, but to fragmentation. Already, Syria’s future is in question. The forces that toppled Assad remain fragmented, with unclear intentions. Will they work toward a pluralistic democracy, or will the vacuum be filled by militant Islamists or fractious warlords? The spectre of Syria becoming another Libya or Yemen looms large, and with it comes the threat of worsening humanitarian crises and regional instability.

News: Trump has big plans at home, but Syria shows why he can’t escape the world’s problems

October 10, 2019

Adding to the complexity is the stance of President-elect Donald Trump, who has signalled a reluctance to engage. Trump’s dismissal of the crisis as “not our fight” and his stated preference for American disengagement risk leaving Syria’s future to be shaped entirely by other powers. While his instinct to avoid another costly military intervention is understandable, a complete abdication of U.S. influence would be shortsighted. Syria’s fate affects global security, refugee flows, and the balance of power in the Middle East.

July 25, 2012

However, engagement does not need to mean boots on the ground. The U.S. and its allies have diplomatic, economic, and humanitarian tools that can help steer Syria toward stability. Coordinating international aid, mediating among rival factions, and ensuring accountability for war crimes—including Assad’s use of chemical weapons—are ways the U.S. can support Syria’s transition without direct military involvement. Ignoring this moment, as some readers and commentators have noted, risks exacerbating the chaos and allowing the most ruthless actors to dictate Syria’s future.

February 23, 2018

The fall of Assad is a victory against tyranny, but it is only a step on the path to rebuilding a shattered nation. Syria’s people have suffered enough under his rule and deserve the chance to chart their own course. It is incumbent upon the international community to ensure this pivotal moment leads to peace, justice, and the beginnings of a stable, inclusive government. Whether Assad himself faces justice for his crimes will be a key test of that effort and a signal to other despots that impunity is no longer an option.


This past weekend, the world woke up to something many thought they’d never see: the sudden collapse of Bashar al-Assad’s brutal dictatorship. After over five decades of the Assad family’s grip on Syria, the regime crumbled as its two lifelines, Russia and Iran, finally pulled out, distracted by their own mounting crises. It’s a moment that feels both overdue and precarious, a mix of cautious hope and the dread of what’s next.

I’ve been drawing Bashar Assad for more than 25 years, watching his transformation from an awkward heir apparent to one of the Middle East’s most notorious autocrats. Back in 2000, when the younger Assad inherited power from his father Hafez, there was a brief flicker of optimism that maybe, just maybe, he’d steer Syria toward reform. He was, after all, “from my generation,” two years older than me—a fact that still unsettles me as I think about how differently our lives turned out. It took about five minutes for that hope to evaporate. My first drawing of Bashar captured that cynicism. Twenty years later, it’s not smugness I feel about being right—it’s exhaustion at the cost of his reign: a half-million lives lost, cities turned to rubble, the mass displacement of Syrians, and atrocities like barrel bombs and sarin gas attacks on his own people.

Now that he’s toppled, the map of Syria looks like a surreal Christmas cookie—splintered into countless zones of control, each a proxy for international players or local factions. Russia and Iran, Assad’s chief backers, are the obvious losers here. Their investment in this dictatorship hasn’t just failed; it’s left them weaker on the global stage. For Iran, it’s a blow to its regional influence. For Putin, it’s another humiliation in a year full of them. The rubble of Assad’s Syria is now their shared legacy.

And then there’s the United States, where President Trump seems blindsided by all of this. His long-standing preference for “staying out of the Middle East mess” is being tested in real time. It’s hard to imagine him being thrilled about having to recalibrate American policy—or frankly, even getting briefed on it. You can practically hear him grumbling, “This isn’t my problem,” as he reluctantly puts his golf clubs away.

In many ways, Assad’s collapse feels like the fall of Mubarak or Gaddafi—a dictator toppled, a power vacuum created, and a nervous world watching to see which warlord, faction, or proxy will claim the spoils. Yet there’s a unique tragedy to Syria, a country that has been so relentlessly broken by both its rulers and foreign meddling that it’s hard to imagine what “stability” even looks like anymore.

One thing is certain: whatever comes next, it cannot be worse than Assad’s reign. But then again, we’ve said that before, haven’t we?

This animated making-of clip of the Dec 10, 2024 editorial cartoon introduces an attempt at trying out an AI generated Trump voice. Yes, I know, it needs work… volume up please. Enjoy! Enjoy!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack


 

Posted in: International, USA Tagged: Ali Khamenei, autocrat, Ayatollah, Basher Assad, golf, International, Iran, Russia, Substack, Syria, tyranny, USA, Vladimir Putin, world

Wednesday October 2, 2024

October 8, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

On the first anniversary of the war, Iran's continued backing of Hamas and Hezbollah underscores its role in prolonging the conflict and obstructing any path toward peace between Israel and Palestine.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday October 8, 2024

Animated making-of clip here!

A Year After October 7: The Dead End of Hamas’s Brutality and the World’s Inaction

Netanyahu’s military escalation may yield short-term successes, but without a shift toward diplomacy and a genuine commitment to addressing Palestinian grievances, the region risks spiralling into even greater chaos.

September 28, 2024

As we mark the first anniversary of Hamas’s brutal assault on Israel, it is impossible to overstate the devastating consequences of that attack—not just for the Israelis and Palestinians but for the broader goal of peace in the Middle East. In his recent essay, New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman forcefully condemned Hamas’s actions on October 7, calling them not only indefensible but also a severe setback to any hopes for a peaceful resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He is right. Hamas’s violence, fuelled by hatred and driven by no goal other than destruction, has shattered any glimmers of hope for the long-term solution that should be the only acceptable outcome: two states for two peoples, living side by side in dignity and peace.

Thomas L. Friedman: What I’m Thinking About on the First Anniversary of the War

The attack, in which Hamas brutally murdered, kidnapped, and terrorized Israeli civilians, was horrific. It left communities devastated, families shattered, and deepened the abyss of mutual mistrust and hostility. But beyond the raw brutality, what is particularly tragic is how much this act has set back the cause of Palestinian statehood—the very cause Hamas claims to represent. By engaging in terrorism rather than constructive diplomacy, Hamas not only reignited Israel’s fury but also reinforced global skepticism about the possibility of a peaceful Palestinian leadership emerging in Gaza.

Amidst evolving global challenges, Canada must prioritize aiding Ukraine's defence against Russian aggression while also providing crucial humanitarian assistance to address the famine crisis in Palestine.

March 20, 2024

For decades, the two-state solution has been seen by many, including Friedman and countless international diplomats, as the only viable path to peace. Yet Hamas’s actions have pushed that vision further out of reach. It was a strategic blunder as much as it was a moral atrocity, handing Israel the justification to retaliate with overwhelming force and to focus on military victory rather than any long-term political solution.

And what of the innocent civilians on both sides? The war has inflicted untold suffering on ordinary people, caught in the crossfire of this seemingly endless conflict. In Israel, families live in constant fear of rocket attacks. In Gaza, civilians—women, children, the elderly—are paying the price for Hamas’s decision to embed itself in residential areas, hospitals, and schools. Gaza’s residents, already living in crippling poverty and under blockade, have been subjected to unimaginable horrors. Hospitals have been bombed, neighbourhoods reduced to rubble, and the humanitarian crisis has worsened by the day. Israel’s military actions, aimed at Hamas, have also caused widespread civilian casualties, deepening the despair of a people who have already suffered for far too long.

Yet as Friedman rightly points out, Israel, too, bears responsibility for its inability to offer a vision for Gaza beyond “total victory” over Hamas. Prime Minister Netanyahu’s government has pursued a war strategy that, without a plan for what comes next, risks turning Gaza into an eternal battlefield. The relentless bombing of schools and homes to kill a few militants is not a long-term solution, and it only solidifies Israel’s image as a brutal occupier in the eyes of much of the world. Without articulating a vision for peace—a real future for the Palestinians who live in Gaza—Israel will never be able to claim victory in the broader battle for the moral high ground.

Putin and Iran are using the Israel-Palestine crisis to divert attention from Russia's Ukraine invasion and undermine the West by supporting Hamas and spreading anti-Western disinformation.

October 20, 2023

The international community, for its part, has failed miserably in its responsibility to broker peace and end the senselessness. For a year, global leaders have stood by, wringing their hands while the violence escalates, incapable or unwilling to step in and demand a cease-fire, negotiate a viable solution, or impose any meaningful consequences for war crimes. The United States, under President Biden, has sent mixed messages—offering tepid warnings to Israel while continuing to supply weapons. Meanwhile, Europe, once a voice for human rights, has largely remained silent as Gaza burns. The global community’s dysfunction and impotence are a tragedy of their own, enabling the continuation of violence and suffering.

News: War rages on multiple fronts as Israel marks a year since Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack

Friedman also touches on a darker undercurrent in Israeli politics: Prime Minister Netanyahu’s apparent interest in prolonging the war to serve his own political needs. Facing corruption charges, Netanyahu has used the conflict to delay his day in court and to bolster his standing with his far-right allies, who demand total victory and the continued expansion of settlements in the West Bank. This political calculus, combined with a lack of coherent strategy, risks dragging Israel into a perpetual cycle of violence, one in which neither peace nor security can ever be fully achieved.

The relentless conflict in Gaza places both Palestinian and Israeli civilians in a dire predicament. As Hamas, responsible for numerous deadly acts against Israel and hostage-taking, triggers a planned offensive by Israel's IDF in northern Gaza City, it is inevitable that innocent civilians will suffer the repercussions.

October 14, 2023

This anniversary is a grim reminder of what happens when extremism, short-term thinking, and cynical political maneuvering drive policy instead of a genuine commitment to peace. Hamas, with its embrace of terror and rejection of diplomacy, has done as much harm to the Palestinian cause as it has to Israeli civilians. Meanwhile, Israel’s military response, unchecked by the international community and lacking any clear endgame, has deepened the suffering of Palestinians and alienated the global moral support it once relied on.

But there is a way forward—if only the world will seize it. As Friedman suggests, the key lies in rebuilding a legitimate Palestinian partner for peace, one that is capable of leading Gaza and the West Bank toward statehood. The Palestinian Authority, despite its flaws, remains the only viable alternative to Hamas. Israel must support its reform and empower it to govern Gaza, as part of a broader vision of two states. At the same time, the international community must pressure Israel to halt settlement expansion and recognize that permanent occupation and endless war will never bring security or peace.

It is a bitter irony that, one year after the October 7 attacks, the future seems bleaker than ever for both Israelis and Palestinians. But it does not have to be this way. There is still a path toward peace, if leaders on all sides are willing to take it. That path, however, requires an end to violence, an end to cynicism, and a renewed commitment to the only solution that can ever bring lasting justice and security: two states for two peoples, living side by side. Anything less is not just a failure of leadership—it is a failure of humanity. (AI)


Letter to the Editor, The Hamilton Spectator, Wednesday October 9, 2024 

Cartoon an ‘inversion of reality’

October 9, 2024 letter

Graeme Mackay’s Oct. 8 cartoon depicted Israel’s prime minister fighting over a dove with Iran’s ayatollah, standing over a mountain of bones. This caricature drew an obscene moral equivalence.

One year ago, Hamas (an Iranian-backed terrorist proxy), launched the biggest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. The next day, Hezbollah, another Iranian proxy, began firing 10,000 rockets indiscriminately into Israel. Soon the Houthis in Yemen and other groups allied with Iran joined in. All of them are sworn to Israel’s destruction.

And yet Israel — for refusing to lie down and die — is put in the same category as the genocidal maniacs who seek to destroy it, and whose followers have been rampaging on our streets for a year? This is akin to showing Hitler and Churchill fighting over a mountain of graves and is an absolute inversion of reality.

Robert Walker, assistant director, Honest Reporting Canada


Letter to the Editor, The Hamilton Spectator, Thursday October 10, 2024 

Innocents caught in the crossfire
Re: Cartoon an ‘inversion of reality’ Oct. 9

October 10, 2024 

Graeme MacKay’s Oct. 8 cartoon depicted the reality of what is now happening in Gaza and the West Bank. What happened on Oct. 7, 2023, is pure horror for the people of Israel and for Jews around the world. As for how it was allowed to happen, the Israeli people deserve an honest answer.

For Israel, when it comes to defending its people, that is totally understandable. What the gentleman from HonestReporting Canada has failed to see is, peace is something that is earned. In all honesty whether it is Hamas, an extremely violent terrorist group, or prime minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu — both have caused the deaths of thousands of innocent people. The failure to see what has happened to these people is unconscionable.

Margo May Taylor, Ancaster

Posted in: International Tagged: 2024-18, animated, anniversary, Ayatollah, Benjamin Netanyahu, Feedback, Gaza, Hamas, Hezbollah, Honest Reporting, Iran, Israel, letter, massacre, October 6, Palestine, peace
1 2 Next »
...Check it out and please subscribe!

Your one-stop-MacKay-shop…

T-shirts, hoodies, clocks, duvet covers, mugs, stickers, notebooks, smart phone cases and scarfs

2023 Coronation Design
Follow Graeme's board My Own Cartoon Favourites on Pinterest.

MacKay’s Virtual Gallery

Copyright © 2016 mackaycartoons.net

Powered by Wordpess and Alpha.

DMCA.com Protection Status
Loading Comments...