MacKay - Canadian Editorial Cartoons
mackaycartoons

Graeme MacKay's Editorial Cartoon Archive

  • Who?
  • Copyright
  • Boutique
  • Kings & Queens
  • Prime Ministers
  • Presidents
  • The French Monarchy Project
  • DOWNLOADS

climate change

Thursday June 26, 2025

June 26, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Ontario's climate targets are at risk due to policy decisions prioritizing economic growth over environmental action, sparking criticism and calls for genuine change.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday June 26, 2025

Published in the Toronto Star.

Ontario’s Climate Conundrum: Promises vs. Reality

Doug Ford's Bill 17 sidesteps environmental protections and local governance, prioritizing development at the cost of Ontario's sustainability.

June 6, 2025

In recent years, Ontario’s approach to climate change has raised serious concerns among environmentalists, scientists, and citizens alike. The province’s leadership, under Premier Doug Ford and Environment Minister Todd McCarthy, has consistently demonstrated a troubling pattern of prioritizing economic development over environmental stewardship. With the dismantling of the cap-and-trade program, opposition to federal carbon pricing, and the controversial pursuit of development in the Greenbelt, it is evident that climate change is alarmingly low on their priority list.

News: Ontario environment minister said ‘we are on track’ to meet 2030 climate targets. Internal docs disagree

Doug Ford and Donald Trump share a common approach that prioritizes economic development over environmental protections, raising concerns about sustainability.

May 21 2025

The rhetoric from Ontario’s leaders, claiming that the province is “on track” to meet its 2030 climate targets, is increasingly at odds with internal assessments and the lived reality of intensifying climate impacts. Internal documents reveal that Ontario is set to miss its emissions reduction targets, contradicting public statements made by Minister McCarthy. This disconnect between words and actions is emblematic of a broader trend of apathy towards the climate crisis.

Globally, we are witnessing the devastating consequences of a warming planet. Wildfires, extreme heat, and once-in-a-century floods are becoming annual occurrences, wreaking havoc on communities and ecosystems. The data is irrefutable: human-induced climate change is driving these disasters, and urgent action is needed to curb carbon emissions.

Premier Doug Ford's recent efforts to protect Ontario's Greenbelt are met with skepticism, as his government's track record, including a shift towards fossil fuels and the cancellation of green energy projects, raises doubts about their commitment to environmental preservation.

October 18, 2023

Yet, Ontario finds itself in the company of leaders who seem to rely on faith over data to guide environmental policy. This is not just an Ontario issue. With a U.S. President who dismisses environmental concerns and a Canadian federal government under Mark Carney that has capitulated on carbon pricing, it feels as though climate denial and inaction have found an unsettling foothold in North American politics.

Analysis: Doug Ford’s Bill 5 will lead to environmental “slaughter fest”

The path forward requires more than empty promises and political posturing. It demands genuine commitment to policies that reduce emissions, protect natural habitats, and transition to renewable energy. This is not merely an environmental issue; it is an economic and social imperative. The costs of inaction—both financial and human—are far greater than those of implementing robust climate policies.

Ultimately, the responsibility lies with the voters. It is imperative for citizens to hold their leaders accountable and demand action grounded in science and data. We need politicians who not only acknowledge the climate crisis but are willing to take bold steps to address it. The future of Ontario, and indeed the planet, depends on our collective resolve to act decisively and ambitiously in the face of this existential threat. It’s time to move beyond rhetoric and embrace the reality that climate action cannot wait.


All The Rages (in 2 Parts)

Part I: Not achieving Emission Targets

We keep hearing the same old “it’s time to move beyond talk” line, but where’s the action? Right now, it seems like nobody is really bothered about the climate crisis. Doug Ford and his sidekick Todd McCarthy seem to think they can just coast along, relying on blind faith instead of hard facts and data to hit those climate targets.

And, of course, you can always count on the usual crowd of politicians and climate deniers who love to point fingers at China and India, claiming that if they’re not doing anything, neither should we. As if using their recklessness as a role model is somehow going to solve the crisis. Newsflash: ignoring the problem because someone else is doing worse isn’t going to make it go away.

Look at the bigger picture: the U.S. has a President who couldn’t care less about the environment, and Mark Carney’s federal government is caving on carbon pricing. Ontario fits right in with this crowd. Meanwhile, wildfires are raging, temperatures are soaring, and floods that should happen once in a century are now a yearly disaster. The evidence is piling up that our planet’s heating up, and if we don’t cut carbon emissions, we’re in big trouble.

Ford and McCarthy can’t just wing it on climate change. This needs real attention, not just lip service. It’s on us as voters to push for leaders who genuinely care and are committed to hitting those climate targets.

And now ye olde refrain: Time to get serious and make some noise for real change!

Part II: AI Excitement

If you’re a regular at the Graeme Gallery here on Substack, you’re probably used to my relentless calls for climate action and my experiments with animating editorial cartoons. In today’s digital age, the old tools of Bristol boards, pen nibs, and black ink are a distant memory. I left that behind when I was let go from my office at the Hamilton Spectator on the day the WHO declared the COVID pandemic.

Since then, I’ve created all my work on an iPad Pro using an iPencil and the ProCreate app. This software captures a time-lapse video of the cartoon’s creation. I use Capcut to condense these videos, showcasing the line drawing, colouring, and adding text, voiceovers, sound effects, and music. What used to be a full day’s work for the next morning’s paper is now an engaging digital segment.

Now, AI has entered the scene, offering a whole new layer of animation. My fascination with AI feels like my first driverless car ride in Phoenix, Arizona, last year. It’s incredible at first—handing over control to a machine—but it soon becomes routine. Those AI-generated clips of Donald Trump sumo wrestling or on a beach with Vladimir Putin are amusing but quickly lose their novelty.

I acknowledge the irony of a cartoonist critiquing the government’s lacklustre climate efforts while using cutting-edge tech that consumes energy. This is my first foray into incorporating AI into my work. You’ll notice it in some scenes where I let the “AI God” modify my intellectual property randomly. I used the online website HailuoAI to generate some of the scenes.

I’m not sure how useful this will be for me moving forward, but it’s worth exploring.

Posted in: Ontario Tagged: 2025-12, climate change, climate crisis, cornhole, Doug Ford, emissions, environment, Ontario, targets, Todd McCarthy

Wednesday May 21 2025

May 21, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Doug Ford and Donald Trump share a common approach that prioritizes economic development over environmental protections, raising concerns about sustainability.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday May 21 2025

Ford and Trump: Economic Growth at Environment’s Cost

Doug Ford’s decision to align himself with Donald Trump’s trade rhetoric might protect Ontario’s economy in the short term but risks alienating key allies and undermining long-term prosperity.

November 16, 2024

In a striking political maneuver, Doug Ford secured a third term as Ontario’s Premier by channeling public outrage against Donald Trump and his tariff policies. This strategy, while effective at the polls, has obscured a more profound and troubling similarity between Ford and Trump: a shared devotion to economic development that disregards environmental sustainability and, arguably, the very reality of climate change.

NYT Opinion: The U.S. Under Trump: Alone in Its Climate Denial

This Halloween, the Government of Doug Ford grapples with renewed scrutiny over the Greenbelt scandal, as an unprecedented number of Minister's zoning orders (MZOs) stir concerns of favouritism towards developers, echoing past controversies and prompting calls for increased transparency in the process.

October 31, 2023

Ford’s recent legislative actions and budgetary decisions echo the deregulatory zeal that characterized Trump’s presidency. Both leaders have prioritized immediate economic growth, often through support for traditional energy sectors and infrastructure projects, over long-term environmental stewardship.

Bill 5, a legislative proposal under Ford’s government, seeks to create “special economic zones” that bypass established environmental regulations and Indigenous consultation processes. This move mirrors Trump’s efforts to roll back federal environmental protections in favour of accelerating industrial projects. Critics argue that such policies represent a short-sighted approach, undermining ecological safeguards and social equity in pursuit of rapid economic gains.

July 11, 2018

Environmentalists and Indigenous leaders have voiced strong opposition, warning that Bill 5 could lead to the destruction of habitats and erosion of constitutionally protected rights. The Toronto Star’s coverage highlights the potential for this legislation to concentrate power within the provincial cabinet, enabling decisions that may favour private interests over public good—a hallmark of the Trump administration’s approach to governance.

The Narwhal’s analysis of Ontario’s budget reveals further parallels. Despite recent extreme weather events, Ford’s government has opted to cut funding for emergency preparedness and forest firefighting. Instead, the focus remains on building highways and expanding mining in the Ring of Fire, areas rich in critical minerals but fraught with ecological and social concerns.

The Narwal: Ontario budget weighs tariff threats, ignores climate threat

December 1, 2018

This emphasis on infrastructure expansion at the expense of environmental considerations is reminiscent of Trump’s prioritization of fossil fuel projects and infrastructure over climate action. Both leaders seem to view environmental regulations as obstacles to economic progress rather than essential safeguards for future generations.

Perhaps most concerning is the apparent dismissal of climate change as a pressing issue. Ford’s policies, much like Trump’s, lack a comprehensive strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or address the root causes of climate change. The reliance on fossil fuels has increased under both administrations, reversing progress made in previous years and contributing to higher emissions.

Ford’s budget cuts to environmental programs and resistance to sustainable transport solutions, such as bike lanes and public transit expansion, further underscore a disconnect between economic policies and environmental realities. This approach risks leaving Ontario—and indeed the world—ill-prepared for the escalating impacts of climate change.

The Toronto Star: Ford government denies bill to speed up development will override environmental and Indigenous concerns

COP29 is unfolding as a display of contradictions and empty promises, as world leaders skirt climate responsibilities amid worsening global disasters and the resurgence of climate crisis denial.

November 12, 2024

The Greenbelt controversy, which plagued Ford’s government, serves as a glaring example of the administration’s failure to learn from its mistakes. Despite public outcry and legal challenges over attempts to develop protected lands, the government continues to pursue similar policies that prioritize development over conservation. This pattern of behavior suggests a persistent disregard for environmental sustainability and public trust.

While Ford’s political strategy of leveraging external threats like Trump’s tariffs may win elections, it cannot mask the fundamental need for a balanced approach to development. Economic prosperity and environmental sustainability are not mutually exclusive; they must be pursued in tandem to ensure a viable future.

Substack: Donald Trump: Dirtiest U.S. President Ever

June 2, 2017

Both Ford and Trump have demonstrated a penchant for policies that prioritize short-term economic gains over long-term ecological health. As voters and citizens, it is crucial to demand leadership that recognizes and addresses the intertwined challenges of economic development and environmental stewardship. Only then can we hope to achieve a sustainable and equitable future for all.



Denial’s Golden Voyage: Sailing Past Reality in 2025 by The Graeme Gallery

Wednesday May 21, 2025

Read on Substack

Posted in: Ontario Tagged: 2025-10, ancient egypt, Bill 5, climate change, climate denial, conservation, deregulation, Donald Trump, Doug Ford, economic development, Egypt, environment, greenbelt, infrastructure, Ontario, pharaoh, sustainability

Tricks, Treats, and the Quest for Clarity

April 19, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Saturday April 19, 2025 | Newsletter 27

From the last seven days, we explore the illusions cast by political figures in their campaigns, the looming influence of external forces, and the urgent call for transparency as the election approaches.

The concerns regarding Pierre Poilievre's casual use of the Notwithstanding clause include the potential undermining of the balance of power, diminishing the importance of Charter rights, the risk of misuse and abuse, and setting a dangerous precedent for future governments.

Monday April 14, 2025 | Rerun of the week: PP’s Whack-a-mole (From Saturday May 4, 2024)

In a rerun from almost a year ago, we critique Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s proposal to use the notwithstanding clause, which allows governments to override Charter-protected rights. The cartoon highlights risks to judicial independence and public trust, especially as Poilievre aims to bypass a Supreme Court ruling on life sentences without parole. Recently revisiting this idea raises fresh concerns, especially with parallels to Trump’s influence in the U.S. By signalling a willingness to sidestep court decisions, Poilievre risks losing support from voters who value judicial checks and balances. A more nuanced approach could help him respect judicial independence while advocating for his policies.

The 2025 Canadian election sees major parties sidestepping climate change, prioritizing immediate economic concerns while the urgency of the climate crisis remains unaddressed.

Tuesday April 15, 2025 | The Illusionists’ Show

In Canada’s 2025 election, Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre act as political magicians. Carney’s temporary tax break and Poilievre’s climate denial, represented by a gorilla, are tricks that vanish once the election ends. Poilievre’s lack of a climate plan puts him behind, while Carney is ready to lead the conversation on sustainability. True leadership must tackle real issues once the illusions fade.
Youtube: Master illusionists of Environmental Policies

Ontario faces the dual challenge of countering U.S. tariffs while addressing internal issues in healthcare, housing, and social services, amid the Speech from the Throne.

Wednesday April 16, 2025 | Tariffs, Turmoil and Thrones

Ontario’s chamber is the stage. Lieutenant Governor Edith Dumont delivers the Speech from the Throne. Premier Doug Ford sits on her left, frowning and saying, “Ontario is not for sale!”—a jab at U.S. President Donald Trump, who grins on the right, loving the regal vibe. While Trump revels in the theatrics, Ford faces the challenge of dealing with tariffs and local issues. This scene highlights Ford’s effort to stand firm against Trump’s king-like charm.
Youtube: Shopping For Thrones

Trump's rhetoric and policies loom over Canada's leaders' debate, influencing politics and personal decisions.

Thursday April 17, 2025 | Trump’s Influence in Canada’s Leaders’ Debate

In the debate spectacle, the caption “Knockout Punch” captures viewers’ anticipation for dramatic moments, much like race car crashes or hockey fights, and takes on a double meaning with Karoline Leavitt’s involvement. Her attractive and confident exterior contrasts sharply with her contentious role as a spokesperson, where she frequently berates reporters and spreads misinformation, echoing Trump’s rhetoric instead of effectively bridging the U.S. executive branch and the media. At her White House podium she boldly asserts that Canadians would benefit from becoming the 51st state, eliciting concerned looks from Canadian leaders and humorously critiquing U.S. influence on Canada. This statement highlights the underlying, ever-present threat of annexation, a not so funny reality, which looms over the election and remains a significant issue for the foreseeable future, overshadowing domestic debate points.
Youtube: Trump in the Debate

The absence of costed platforms from major Canadian political parties leaves voters without crucial fiscal insights, posing risks to informed decision-making.

Friday April 18, 2025 | Unpublished Bunny Cartoon

As the 2025 Canadian election hops closer, our “Parliamentary Budget Bunny” lounges majestically on a throne, offering a whimsical critique of political antics. “COSTED PLATFORMS ANYONE?” it quips, highlighting the glaring absence of fiscal transparency from major parties like the Liberals and Conservatives. In a week shortened by Good Friday, this Easter-themed cartoon was edged out in the battle of the bunnies, yet it captures the relaxed approach to political accountability. While the Greens have hopped ahead with their costed platform, it’s more of a participation ribbon given their poll standings. Some voters are left pondering—where will the cuts land as trade tariffs bite, and promises of tax cuts float unanchored by fiscal plans? Deny it at your peril, but austerity is coming, much like the UK’s unforeseen cuts after Labour was given a majority less than a year ago. With election day just a hare’s breath away, let’s demand clarity and brace for the time when fiscal reality takes centre stage, whether we like it or not.

Pierre Poilievre's plan to invoke the notwithstanding clause threatens Canadian democratic norms and sets a dangerous precedent for federal governance.

Saturday April 19, 2025 | Poilievre’s Notwithstanding Gamble

Shining a light on Pierre Poilievre’s contentious plan to use the notwithstanding clause, while drawing parallels to Trump’s judicial overreach. Yeah, I went there. Poilievre’s proposal to enforce tougher sentencing for multiple murderers taps into populist outrage but raises alarm bells about the potential erosion of judicial independence. Critics warn that using this powerful clause at the federal level could open a Pandora’s box, leading to a slippery slope where individual liberties are at risk. As Poilievre embraces a Trump-like approach, the question looms: what other rights might he sideline next? With the election on the horizon, this cartoon serves as a timely reminder of the dangers of authoritarian overreach cloaked in populist rhetoric.
YouTube: Easter Bunny Rejection

This week’s dive into Canadian politics shows us that while tricks and theatrics can be entertaining, voters are looking for honesty and clarity. With debates now in the history books, we embark on the final gasps of the 2025 federal election. The conclusion of a turbulent five months in Canadian politics blends this week with Day 100 of the reign of Donald Trump. April 28 will bring clarity to the course Canada will take in the months and years to come.

Thank you to everyone who continues to subscribe to this weekly newsletter! I typically release posts every Saturday morning, offering a summary of the week through my editorial cartoons. My aim is to keep you informed without overwhelming you with constant notifications. Throughout the week, I also share daily ‘notes’ on my Substack, which enrich my weekly newsletters and feature animated versions of my daily cartoons.

Please Subscribe. It’s free!

Youtube: Animated Week in Review: April 14-19, 2025

Substack is an invaluable platform for me, especially given the uncertainties that come with being a staff editorial cartoonist. While I remain optimistic about my future, I am acutely aware of the unfortunate layoffs and newspaper closures that have impacted many talented colleagues in our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will always be free. Thank you for your continued support!

Posted in: Substack Post Tagged: 2025-08, climate change, Donald Trump, Doug Ford, Easter, election, Karoline Leavitt, leaders’ debate, Mark Carney, notwithstanding clause, Speech from the Throne, Week in review

Tuesday April 15, 2025

April 15, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

The 2025 Canadian election sees major parties sidestepping climate change, prioritizing immediate economic concerns while the urgency of the climate crisis remains unaddressed.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday April 15, 2025

Climate Change Takes a Backseat in Canada’s 2025 Election

Wednesday March 19, 2025

March 19, 2025

As Canadians head to the polls in 2025, the pressing issue of climate change seems to have been relegated to a whisper amidst the cacophony of economic concerns, tariffs, and geopolitical tensions. The two major parties, the Poilievre Conservatives and the Carney Liberals, have conspicuously sidestepped the climate crisis in their campaigns, raising critical questions about their commitment to addressing what remains one of the most urgent challenges of our time.

Analysis: Election 2025: a voter’s guide to carbon taxes, natural resources and other key environment issues in Canada

In recent elections, climate change was at the forefront, with parties vying to present credible plans to reduce emissions and transition to a sustainable future. However, today, the political landscape has shifted dramatically. According to Vote Compass data, environmental issues have plummeted in voter priority, eclipsed by immediate economic pressures and Canada-U.S. relations. Yet, the urgency of the climate crisis has not diminished; it is merely overshadowed.

Pierre Poilievre's push for a carbon tax election is an opportunity for Canadians to confront the costs of climate inaction—but the debate must focus on real solutions, not just slogans.

September 25, 2024

The Conservatives’ Concerning Silence: Pierre Poilievre’s Conservatives have adopted a strategy that sidesteps comprehensive climate policy. By framing climate change as a “global problem” and proposing Canadian LNG exports as a solution to reduce global coal usage, Poilievre avoids committing to domestic emissions targets. This absence of a solid, actionable plan is concerning and unacceptable. While economic growth and job creation are vital, they cannot come at the expense of ignoring a crisis that demands immediate and sustained action.

News: Climate change fades as a campaign issue as tariffs dominate federal election

Despite the increasing devastation caused by climate-fuelled hurricanes, backed by data proving dramatic temperature increases in the Gulf of Mexico, political denialism, lack of media attention in the United States, and a lack of courageous leadership continue to obstruct meaningful action on the climate crisis.

October 10, 2024

The Liberals’ Temporary Retreat: On the other side, Mark Carney’s Liberals have made a strategic retreat by eliminating the consumer carbon price. This move, influenced by public dissatisfaction and economic pressures, might be seen as a temporary concession—a pragmatic pause rather than a permanent shift. For those concerned about climate change, this decision is a double-edged sword: it alleviates immediate economic burdens but risks undermining long-term climate goals.

The hope remains that this pause is just that—temporary. The Liberals must return to the table with a robust communications strategy, one that clearly articulates the benefits of carbon pricing and other climate policies. The Trudeau Liberals’ rollout of the carbon tax was fraught with challenges, allowing the Poilievre Conservatives to hijack the narrative and cast it as a burden rather than a necessary step towards sustainability.

Analysis: In 2021, there was nearly a consensus on climate change. In 2025, Carney and Poilievre are far apart

Trudeau's unwavering support for carbon pricing in the face of opposition underscores its essential role in Canada's climate action, contrasting with Pierre Poilievre's lack of a credible alternative, emphasizing the imperative for pragmatic solutions in confronting the urgent threat of climate change.

March 14, 2024

A Call for Courage and Clarity: The reluctance of both parties to address climate change head-on is a disservice to Canadians and future generations. While other issues understandably demand attention, the climate crisis cannot be perpetually postponed. It requires bold leadership and a commitment to transparent, effective policies that balance economic growth with environmental stewardship.

The 2025 election should have been an opportunity to strengthen Canada’s resolve in fighting climate change, not a retreat into the shadows of political convenience. As voters, we must demand more from our leaders—a clear, unwavering commitment to a sustainable future. The time for silence is over; the climate cannot wait.


The Illusion that Climate Change is a Non-Issue – This cartoon is bound to ruffle feathers among both Liberal and Conservative partisans. Yet, as I’ve stated before and will reiterate, my allegiance is to truth, not to any political party. Editorial cartoonists should be impartial, challenging all sides equally. Our purpose is to provoke thought, which naturally may offend those with entrenched political loyalties.

Supporters of Pierre Poilievre might argue against the depiction of him as a climate denier, while Liberals may question why their leader is depicted alongside him. However, both leaders share a stance against the carbon tax. The previous government under Justin Trudeau introduced a well-intentioned tax and rebate scheme aimed at taxing the largest consumer polluters—those with multiple cars, properties, and frequent travel habits—while benefiting the environmentally conscious and less affluent citizens. Unfortunately, Trudeau failed to effectively communicate the policy’s benefits, allowing Poilievre to exploit this communication gap and rally against it.

The consumer carbon pricing scheme, a key tool for meeting Canada’s Paris Agreement commitments, now teeters on the brink of extinction. Mark Carney, in an unexpected move, completed Poilievre’s “Axe the Tax” campaign, dismantling a program that had potential for significant environmental impact.

If Poilievre assumes office, the illusion of his environmental concern will dissipate, aligning with climate-denying regimes. Conversely, if Carney takes the helm, there’s a glimmer of hope for reintroducing consumer carbon taxes, though he remains reticent about his plans, and his supporters remain uncurious.

We find ourselves in a precarious position, seemingly ignoring the gravity of climate change, influenced by misinformation and rhetoric from a conservative leader who dismisses the climate crisis. Drill baby drill, is the mantra of Conservatives, a familiar refrain to was is heard in the south – yes the fossil fuel sector is important especially in light of tariff turmoil, but it is imperative that we remain vigilant, demanding transparency and action to safeguard our planet’s future.

Master illusionists of Environmental Policies – April 15, 2025: https://youtu.be/4wuAP1x6RMY

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

 

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2025-08, Canada, Climate, climate change, Conservative, crisis, denial, denier, Economy, election, emissions, globe, gorilla, leadership, Liberal, magic, Mark Carney, Pierre Poilievre, policies, pricing, sustainability

Wednesday March 19, 2025

March 19, 2025 by Graeme MacKay
Wednesday March 19, 2025

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday March 19, 2025

Pierre Poilievre’s Plan to Undo Carbon Pricing: A Step Backward for Canada’s Climate Commitment

The escalating impacts of climate change, symbolized by metaphorical "Four Horsemen" including extreme heat gripping continents from North America to Asia, underscore the urgent need for global action to mitigate rising temperatures and their profound consequences on human health, infrastructure, and ecosystems.

June 20, 2024

As the climate crisis intensifies, countries around the world are working hard to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and meet international targets. Many progressive industrial nations have adopted carbon pricing as a crucial part of their strategy to combat climate change. However, Pierre Poilievre’s plan to eliminate carbon pricing in Canada risks reversing the progress we’ve made and could harm our reputation on the global stage.

Carbon pricing is an important tool that encourages businesses to cut emissions by making it cost-effective to invest in cleaner technologies. By putting a price on carbon emissions, we motivate companies to adopt greener practices, ultimately benefiting both the environment and the economy. Poilievre’s opposition to this approach shows a reluctance to embrace the necessary steps for a sustainable future for Canadians.

News: Net zero by 2050 ‘impossible’ for UK, says Badenoch

July 21, 2022

A worrying trend among conservative leaders is emerging globally, as highlighted by Kemi Badenoch’s recent comments in the UK. Badenoch, leader of the Conservative Party, stated that achieving the UK’s net zero target by 2050 is “impossible” without harming living standards or bankrupting the country. This marks a significant departure from the previous political agreement on the importance of addressing climate change. By aligning with such views, Poilievre risks placing Canada among those countries that are stepping back from their environmental responsibilities.

It’s also worth noting that Canadian conservatives once had a more forward-thinking approach. Under Erin O’Toole’s leadership, the Conservative Party supported carbon pricing as part of a broader climate strategy. O’Toole recognized the need for a carbon pricing system to drive innovation and reduce emissions. However, with Poilievre now leading the party, it has shifted back to outright opposition to carbon pricing, which is a significant step backwards.

August 13, 2021

If Canada rolls back carbon pricing, we could find ourselves among the nations failing to meet their climate commitments. This move would significantly hinder our ability to achieve the net-zero emissions target by 2050, which is essential for tackling climate change. Without a solid pricing mechanism, businesses may lack the motivation to innovate or shift to lower-carbon options.

Moreover, eliminating carbon pricing would damage public trust in Canada’s commitment to international agreements like the Paris Accord. As other countries advance their climate policies, Canada risks being seen as disengaged from the global effort to address climate change. This perception could hurt our international relationships and competitiveness in a world that increasingly values sustainability.

The revenue generated from carbon pricing is also crucial for funding green projects, public transportation, and renewable energy initiatives. Poilievre’s plan to scrap this revenue would rob Canada of essential funding needed to transition to a low-carbon economy, jeopardizing job creation in the green sector.

News: Poilievre says he would repeal federal carbon pricing for industrial emissions

June 2, 2017

In contrast to Poilievre’s vision, maintaining and strengthening carbon pricing would show leadership in climate action. It would send a clear message that Canada is serious about its environmental responsibilities and is committed to a sustainable future.

Pierre Poilievre’s plan to undo carbon pricing is a step backward that could undermine our climate commitments and hinder our ability to meet global targets. It aligns with a troubling trend among conservative leaders who prioritize economic concerns over environmental protection, as seen in the UK with Badenoch’s remarks. It also represents a retreat from the more progressive stance taken by former Conservative leader Erin O’Toole, who understood the importance of carbon pricing. Canada must remain a leader in the fight against climate change, embracing policies that promote innovation and accountability. The time has come to stand firm in our commitment to a sustainable future and reject proposals that seek to undermine our progress. The future of our planet depends on it.


Make Canada a Climate Laggard Again

If there’s one thing we can say about Justin Trudeau’s legacy, it’s that he put a price on carbon—something that had been debated and denied for years, especially under Stephen Harper’s government. Choosing not to commit to carbon pricing put Canada on the global map of climate laggards, alongside countries that talk a big game about caring for the planet but never actually take meaningful action. It was a pretty embarrassing time for us, especially when we were aligning ourselves with the “drill baby drill” mentality of climate deniers in the U.S.

Now, it feels like we’re sliding back into that old mindset with our own Conservative Party. Just when Canada is trying to set itself apart from the U.S. and connect with progressive partners who genuinely care about climate action, Pierre Poilievre pushed hard to axe the consumer carbon tax, got what he wanted just last week when the new PM Mark Carney did that very thing. Now, Poilievre is calling for the elimination of the industrial carbon tax as well. It’s got people questioning: if there’s no price on carbon, what real action does the Conservative Party plan to take on climate change? This stance could very well make them unelectable come 2025.

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

 

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2025-06, Canada, carbon pricing, climate change, Conservative Party, dance environmental policy, fire, green technology, innovation, international agreements, net zero, Pierre Poilievre, progress, Substack, sustainability
« Previous 1 2 3 4 … 30 Next »
...Check it out and please subscribe!

Your one-stop-MacKay-shop…

T-shirts, hoodies, clocks, duvet covers, mugs, stickers, notebooks, smart phone cases and scarfs

2023 Coronation Design
Follow Graeme's board My Own Cartoon Favourites on Pinterest.

MacKay’s Virtual Gallery

Copyright © 2016 mackaycartoons.net

Powered by Wordpess and Alpha.

DMCA.com Protection Status
Loading Comments...