2025-08 – mackaycartoons

Friday April 25, 2025

April 25, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday April 25, 2025 (Published in the Toronto Star, April 27, 2025)

The Trump Factor in Canada’s Federal Election

April 23, 2025

As Canada’s federal election draws to a close, Donald Trump, the President of the United States, has become an unexpected yet dominant figure in shaping the political discourse. His comments on tariffs, trade agreements, and even the audacious suggestion of Canada as the 51st state have stirred the waters, presenting Canadian voters with three pivotal questions: “Carney or Poilievre: Who’s more Trumpy?”; “Carney or Poilievre: Who’s best for Dealing With Trump?”; and “Carney or Poilievre: Who does Trump Prefer?”

Who’s More Trumpy? In terms of policies and demeanour, Pierre Poilievre undeniably channels more of Trump’s attributes. His rhetoric, which echoes Trump’s nationalist populism, includes slogans that promote a “Canada First” agenda. Poilievre’s approach to reducing government influence, skepticism of international organizations, and a confrontational style resonates with Trump’s signature tactics. On the other hand, Mark Carney embodies a more traditional and balanced leadership approach, prioritizing multilateral cooperation and economic stability. Carney’s focus on diplomacy and evidence-based decision-making starkly contrasts with the more brash techniques associated with Trump.

News: Trump talked about the ’51st state’ during call with Carney: Radio-Canada sources

April 22, 2025

Who’s Best for Dealing With Trump? Despite Poilievre’s ideological similarities with Trump, this doesn’t necessarily make him the best candidate to handle Trump on the international stage. There’s a legitimate concern that Poilievre’s alignment might lead to submission during negotiations, reminiscent of some Republican figures in the U.S. Conversely, Mark Carney, with his extensive background in economics and crisis management, is well-equipped to engage with Trump from a position of informed authority. Trump’s acknowledgment of Carney’s economic expertise likely prompts him to take Carney more seriously than a leader whose policies merely mirror his own.

Who Does Trump Prefer? While it might seem that Trump would naturally favour a leader like Poilievre due to shared ideologies, the reality is more complex. Trump’s respect for Carney’s expertise and strategic acumen is evident. Known for his transactional approach, Trump likely sees value in Carney’s ability to address complex economic issues, understanding that a competent counterpart in Canada could lead to more productive engagements rather than simple ideological alignment.

News: Trump reinserts himself into Canadian politics, saying ‘as a state, it works great’

April 17, 2025

The assumption that Trump would prefer Poilievre simply due to ideological kinship oversimplifies Trump’s pragmatic nature. Trump recognizes Carney’s capabilities and respects his economic insights, understanding that effective leadership involves not just agreement but the capacity for meaningful engagement. As Canadians cast their votes, these considerations emphasize the importance of selecting a leader who can effectively stand up to Trump’s pressures while also facilitating constructive discussions in U.S.-Canada relations. In this election, Carney’s combination of diplomatic skill and economic expertise may offer Canada the most effective path forward in addressing the challenges posed by the Trump era.

Reflection Time

I’ve only got two more editorial cartoons to draw before voting day, and this one featuring Pierre Poilievre consulting the magic mirror counts as one of them! It seems fitting, especially since no U.S. President in living memory has influenced our election so much as Donald Trump has. His comments and antics are really shaping how we view our leaders, especially when it comes to Poilievre and Mark Carney.

As I’m sketching this out, it’s hard not to see how Poilievre channels Trump’s vibe with his “Canada First” attitude and confrontational style. But then there’s Carney, who offers a more diplomatic and balanced approach. It really raises the question: who’s actually better suited to deal with Trump on the global stage?

While Poilievre might seem like a natural fit for Trump due to their shared ideologies, I think Carney’s economic expertise could give him an edge in negotiations. Trump might actually respect Carney’s skills more than just having someone who echoes his populist rhetoric.

It’s fascinating (and a bit concerning) to watch history unfold right before our eyes. So, as we get closer to the polls, let’s think about who can really stand up to Trump’s pressures and foster productive discussions for Canada.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 25, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

You Tube: Pre-Election Day Reflection https://youtu.be/_9UWr9hliC4

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Thursday April 24, 2025

April 24, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday April 24, 2025

As the NDP faces a potential decline in support, Jagmeet Singh’s leadership is under scrutiny, highlighting the party’s need for strategic realignment and renewed focus on core values.

The NDP Faces a Crossroads Amidst Election Uncertainty

March 27, 2025

As Canadians prepare to vote, the New Democratic Party (NDP), under Jagmeet Singh, is facing a tough election. Polls suggest a potential decline in support that could jeopardize the party’s status, highlighting the urgent need for change and strategic adjustment.

Opinion: Donald Trump pounds another nail into the NDP’s coffin

Jagmeet Singh’s leadership has been under intense scrutiny. Since becoming leader in 2017, Singh has had to navigate challenging political landscapes. Yet, his tenure is marked by decisions that have blurred the NDP’s distinct identity. The party’s agreement with the Liberals in 2022, though it brought some policy wins like dental and pharmacare coverage, has left voters wondering what makes the NDP different from the Liberals.

September 6, 2024

Strategically, the NDP has struggled to maintain its footing. By supporting the Liberal government, the party inadvertently gave the Conservatives a chance to gain ground, especially on issues like affordability, traditionally an NDP stronghold. This has led to a loss of support, with voters increasingly turning to parties they see as more capable of addressing pressing economic concerns.

Externally, the influence of Donald Trump has shifted voter focus towards leaders perceived as strong on international trade and relations. This shift has made it challenging for the NDP’s focus on social issues to resonate. Internally, the party grapples with an identity crisis, where a shift towards more fringe policies has alienated moderate supporters.

Critics also point to the NDP’s ambitious social programs, questioning how they plan to fund these initiatives. The perception that the party is out of touch with economic realities has eroded its credibility, even among supporters who align with its social ideals.

Analysis: Singh’s fateful steps

February 29, 2024

Despite these challenges, the situation presents an opportunity for the NDP to regroup and redefine its role. A change in leadership might be necessary to inject fresh energy and realign the party’s strategies with voter priorities. By focusing on core values like healthcare and social equality, and balancing these with economic pragmatism, the NDP can offer a clear and credible alternative to Canadians.

The party’s future will depend on its ability to adapt and reconnect with voters. As the election approaches, how the NDP addresses these challenges will determine its immediate success and long-term role in Canadian politics.

Dire Dipper Days

Pity the NDP and its leader, Jagmeet Singh, whose tenure may be one of the most consequential in decades due to his influence over Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government. Through the Liberal-NDP Supply and Confidence agreement, Singh championed pharmacare, dental care, and elements of the childcare plan. Yet, with just days before the 2025 federal election, the NDP languishes in single-digit support. It seems the party is headed for a harsh voter backlash, possibly signalling the end of Singh’s leadership after eight years. Whether he became too much of a prop for the Liberals, prolonged parliament for his pension, or faced racial bias, the outcome remains uncertain. Though I’m not an NDP member, Singh has been undeniably impactful in enacting NDP policies. Historically, the NDP has influenced significant social reforms, like universal healthcare and the Canada Pension Plan. Today, the party is overshadowed by a national crisis favuoring the Liberals and Conservatives. Though Singh may soon lose his position, his legacy of social benefits for Canadians stands strong.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 24, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

Youtube: April 24, 2025 https://youtu.be/WeNiZj0fLH0

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Wednesday April 23, 2025

April 22, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday April 23, 2025

Canada’s Quiet Resolve in Strengthening Defence Amid Global Uncertainty

March 1, 2024

In the ever-shifting landscape of global politics, where alliances are tested and national interests recalibrated, Canada finds itself at a pivotal juncture. Recent events and political shifts have underscored a growing realization among NATO member countries, including Canada, that bolstering military capabilities is not just a response to external pressures, but a strategic necessity for a world where traditional security assurances can no longer be taken for granted.

The backdrop to this realization is a United States led by President Donald Trump, whose rhetoric and actions have raised concerns about America’s commitment to global security frameworks established post-World War II. Trump’s calls for NATO allies to increase defence spending to five percent of GDP, though seemingly about shared burden, mask a deeper unease about the U.S.’s role as a reliable security partner. Trump’s annexation rhetoric concerning Canada and Greenland, while alarming, reflects an unpredictable approach to international relations that has left many allies wary.

News: Trump wants NATO to spend 5% on defence. What do Canada party leaders say?

January 12, 2022

Canada, traditionally seen as a steadfast partner within NATO, has faced criticism for not meeting the alliance’s defence spending target of two percent of GDP. Yet, there’s a nuanced understanding emerging among Canadian political leaders. Both Liberal Leader Mark Carney and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre have now committed to reaching the two percent target by 2030, aligning their strategies to ensure Canada’s sovereignty and security in an increasingly unstable world. This alignment signifies a shared recognition of the importance of enhancing military capabilities amidst global uncertainties.

This decision reflects a pragmatic approach to defence policy. Canada recognizes that in a world where the U.S. might retreat from its role as a global security guarantor, it must step up to ensure its own defence readiness. The focus is on modernizing the military, securing the Arctic, and investing in cutting-edge technologies like AI and quantum computing, all while maintaining fiscal responsibility.

News: Mark Carney unveils a plan to Trump-proof Canada

July 12, 2018

Canada’s resolve to meet NATO commitments “on its own terms” is emblematic of a broader trend among NATO members. Many countries are recalibrating their defence policies not just due to external pressures from the U.S., but because of the realization that global threats are multifaceted. The unpredictability of a U.S. administration dismissive of trade and military alliances only adds to the urgency.

In this context, Canada’s approach is both sensible and strategic. It is about strengthening defence capabilities while fostering unity and consensus among political leaders. The decision to bolster military spending is not about succumbing to external demands but about safeguarding national interests in a changing global order.

As Canada moves forward, the focus should remain on maintaining a balanced approach that prioritizes security, economic stability, and diplomatic engagement. By doing so, Canada can navigate the complexities of international relations with resilience and resolve, ensuring its place as a respected and reliable partner on the world stage.

PPs 2% Promise

I’ve been closely following Pierre Poilievre’s approach to Canada’s NATO obligations, and his recent commitment to the 2% GDP defence target by 2030 has caught my attention. Until last week’s debate, Poilievre hadn’t specified a timeline, often critiquing the Liberals’ fluctuating target dates between 2028 and 2034 over the past couple of years without presenting his own. Now, it turns out his target aligns precisely with the Liberals’ plan, even as countries worldwide are exceeding the 2% benchmark.

Interestingly, Poilievre’s decision to announce this commitment late in the campaign suggests strategic timing. It’s likely not a stance that would be met with overwhelming enthusiasm, especially within his own party, where it could be quite polarizing. Let’s face it, bolstering defence—even amid increased threats—isn’t high on the average voter’s priority list, particularly with the cost of living crisis intensifying as Trump ramps up tariffs.

This revelation suggests that Poilievre might not be as hawkish as many believed. His mealy mouthed attitude toward supporting Ukraine’s struggle against Putin tyranny is a chief indicator of this for another day. While he shares Trump’s scepticism towards international agreements and multilateralism, evidenced by his rare mention of the Paris Accord, his reticence on NATO commitments raises questions. Nevertheless, he acknowledges the need to strengthen Canada’s military, including against potential U.S. threats.

Historically, Canada’s Conservative Party has championed robust military and defence policies. Yet, in the era of Donald Trump, who demands a 5% GDP commitment to NATO, one might expect Canadian conservatives to follow suit. Instead, Poilievre’s proposal mirrors the Liberals’, aiming for 2030, which I find both intriguing and somewhat lacking.

While I often see parallels between Canadian conservatives and Trump’s Republicans, this divergence is significant. The traditional hawks within Canada’s Conservative Party appear to have less influence, a point worth noting. When it comes to defence, the differences between Canada’s two major parties offered to voters are strikingly similar.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 23, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

PPs 2% Promise https://youtu.be/7QXYW_dp024

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Tuesday April 22, 2025

April 22, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday April 22, 2025

Austerity on the Horizon

April 18, 2025

As Canada approaches its 45th general election, a familiar narrative unfolds: political parties promising tax cuts while remaining vague about the inevitable spending cuts required to balance the books. With platforms that hint at financial prudence but fail to provide detailed roadmaps, both the Liberal and Conservative parties leave voters facing an uncertain fiscal future.

Historically, election platforms have served as a blueprint for governance, offering voters insight into a party’s priorities and fiscal strategies. However, recent campaigns have witnessed a shift towards platforms filled with undefined savings and broad commitments rather than specific financial plans. The Conservatives, for example, have been open about reducing foreign aid and defunding the CBC as part of their cost-cutting measures. Yet, these areas alone cannot compensate for the extensive tax cuts promised, leaving a substantial gap that must be filled by other, undisclosed means.

News: Poilievre pledges platform ‘soon’ after Liberals, NDP release costed campaign plans

April 12, 2025

Similarly, the Liberals tout fiscal prudence, suggesting efficiency improvements in government spending. However, the absence of specifics raises questions about which programs or services might face the axe. Both parties are accused of strategic obfuscation, delaying the release of fully costed platforms to minimize scrutiny and maximize voter support during early voting periods.

With Canada’s economy already grappling with significant debt and high deficits, the promise of tax cuts seems at odds with fiscal sustainability. The looming threat of trade tariffs from the Trump administration adds another layer of complexity, demanding financial commitments to bolster the economy against external shocks. In this context, austerity measures—whether acknowledged or not—appear inevitable.

April 9, 2012

Austerity often translates into spending cuts in essential services like healthcare, education, and infrastructure. While these are rarely highlighted in campaign rhetoric, history shows that governments frequently turn to these areas when seeking to balance budgets. The lack of transparency in detailing these potential cuts leaves voters in the dark, reminiscent of past political strategies where campaign promises diverged significantly from post-election actions.

The current election cycle’s lack of detailed financial planning risks voter disillusionment. As seen in the UK, where the Labour Party’s campaign promises did not align with subsequent austerity measures, Canadian voters may find themselves facing unexpected fiscal policies once the dust of the election settles. This disconnect underscores the need for greater transparency and accountability in political platforms.

March 15, 2025

It is essential for parties to provide clear, realistic financial plans that outline how tax cuts will be funded and what spending adjustments are anticipated. Without such transparency, platforms become mere wish lists rather than actionable blueprints for governance.

As Canadians head to the polls, they do so with a sense of uncertainty about the fiscal path ahead. Whether led by the Liberals or the Conservatives, the next government will likely face the challenge of implementing austerity measures to reconcile campaign promises with economic realities. Voters deserve more than vague assurances; they need concrete plans that address both the opportunities and sacrifices required to achieve fiscal stability. Only then can they make informed decisions about the future direction of their country.

Austerity is Coming La La La, not listening!

In the current political climate, spending cuts are often whispered in hushed tones, especially when addressing crowds outside partisan strongholds. Politicians tend to focus on tax cuts, painting them as the ultimate relief for voters. However, those in partisan circles, like Pierre Poilievre, openly discuss defunding initiatives that irk their base, such as the CBC and foreign aid. The Liberals, on the other hand, remain vague about their intentions, hiding behind terms like “Spending Reviews” and “Program Adjustments” without revealing what might face the chopping block.

The truth is, Canadians should brace themselves for significant cuts in the near future, a reality that’s becoming increasingly apparent on the global stage. In the United States, Trump, through Elon Musk, is aggressively slashing spending across federal departments. Meanwhile, in the UK, even the left-leaning Labour Party under Keir Starmer is undertaking deep cuts, surpassing anything the Conservatives dared to implement during their long tenure.

Austerity is looming over Canada, and now is the time to demand transparency from our leaders. While Conservatives are relatively candid about the fiscal austerity they plan to introduce, the Liberals are more elusive. Yet, if the polls are accurate and they secure another term, the mystery will quickly unravel.

It’s crucial for Canadians to seek clarity and accountability from their political leaders. Austerity is on the horizon, and understanding its implications is vital to navigate the challenges ahead.

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Tricks, Treats, and the Quest for Clarity

April 19, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Saturday April 19, 2025 | Newsletter 27

From the last seven days, we explore the illusions cast by political figures in their campaigns, the looming influence of external forces, and the urgent call for transparency as the election approaches.

Monday April 14, 2025 | Rerun of the week: PP’s Whack-a-mole (From Saturday May 4, 2024)

In a rerun from almost a year ago, we critique Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s proposal to use the notwithstanding clause, which allows governments to override Charter-protected rights. The cartoon highlights risks to judicial independence and public trust, especially as Poilievre aims to bypass a Supreme Court ruling on life sentences without parole. Recently revisiting this idea raises fresh concerns, especially with parallels to Trump’s influence in the U.S. By signalling a willingness to sidestep court decisions, Poilievre risks losing support from voters who value judicial checks and balances. A more nuanced approach could help him respect judicial independence while advocating for his policies.

Tuesday April 15, 2025 | The Illusionists’ Show

In Canada’s 2025 election, Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre act as political magicians. Carney’s temporary tax break and Poilievre’s climate denial, represented by a gorilla, are tricks that vanish once the election ends. Poilievre’s lack of a climate plan puts him behind, while Carney is ready to lead the conversation on sustainability. True leadership must tackle real issues once the illusions fade.
Youtube: Master illusionists of Environmental Policies

Wednesday April 16, 2025 | Tariffs, Turmoil and Thrones

Ontario’s chamber is the stage. Lieutenant Governor Edith Dumont delivers the Speech from the Throne. Premier Doug Ford sits on her left, frowning and saying, “Ontario is not for sale!”—a jab at U.S. President Donald Trump, who grins on the right, loving the regal vibe. While Trump revels in the theatrics, Ford faces the challenge of dealing with tariffs and local issues. This scene highlights Ford’s effort to stand firm against Trump’s king-like charm.
Youtube: Shopping For Thrones

Thursday April 17, 2025 | Trump’s Influence in Canada’s Leaders’ Debate

In the debate spectacle, the caption “Knockout Punch” captures viewers’ anticipation for dramatic moments, much like race car crashes or hockey fights, and takes on a double meaning with Karoline Leavitt’s involvement. Her attractive and confident exterior contrasts sharply with her contentious role as a spokesperson, where she frequently berates reporters and spreads misinformation, echoing Trump’s rhetoric instead of effectively bridging the U.S. executive branch and the media. At her White House podium she boldly asserts that Canadians would benefit from becoming the 51st state, eliciting concerned looks from Canadian leaders and humorously critiquing U.S. influence on Canada. This statement highlights the underlying, ever-present threat of annexation, a not so funny reality, which looms over the election and remains a significant issue for the foreseeable future, overshadowing domestic debate points.
Youtube: Trump in the Debate

Friday April 18, 2025 | Unpublished Bunny Cartoon

As the 2025 Canadian election hops closer, our “Parliamentary Budget Bunny” lounges majestically on a throne, offering a whimsical critique of political antics. “COSTED PLATFORMS ANYONE?” it quips, highlighting the glaring absence of fiscal transparency from major parties like the Liberals and Conservatives. In a week shortened by Good Friday, this Easter-themed cartoon was edged out in the battle of the bunnies, yet it captures the relaxed approach to political accountability. While the Greens have hopped ahead with their costed platform, it’s more of a participation ribbon given their poll standings. Some voters are left pondering—where will the cuts land as trade tariffs bite, and promises of tax cuts float unanchored by fiscal plans? Deny it at your peril, but austerity is coming, much like the UK’s unforeseen cuts after Labour was given a majority less than a year ago. With election day just a hare’s breath away, let’s demand clarity and brace for the time when fiscal reality takes centre stage, whether we like it or not.

Saturday April 19, 2025 | Poilievre’s Notwithstanding Gamble

Shining a light on Pierre Poilievre’s contentious plan to use the notwithstanding clause, while drawing parallels to Trump’s judicial overreach. Yeah, I went there. Poilievre’s proposal to enforce tougher sentencing for multiple murderers taps into populist outrage but raises alarm bells about the potential erosion of judicial independence. Critics warn that using this powerful clause at the federal level could open a Pandora’s box, leading to a slippery slope where individual liberties are at risk. As Poilievre embraces a Trump-like approach, the question looms: what other rights might he sideline next? With the election on the horizon, this cartoon serves as a timely reminder of the dangers of authoritarian overreach cloaked in populist rhetoric.
YouTube: Easter Bunny Rejection

This week’s dive into Canadian politics shows us that while tricks and theatrics can be entertaining, voters are looking for honesty and clarity. With debates now in the history books, we embark on the final gasps of the 2025 federal election. The conclusion of a turbulent five months in Canadian politics blends this week with Day 100 of the reign of Donald Trump. April 28 will bring clarity to the course Canada will take in the months and years to come.

Thank you to everyone who continues to subscribe to this weekly newsletter! I typically release posts every Saturday morning, offering a summary of the week through my editorial cartoons. My aim is to keep you informed without overwhelming you with constant notifications. Throughout the week, I also share daily ‘notes’ on my Substack, which enrich my weekly newsletters and feature animated versions of my daily cartoons.

Please Subscribe. It’s free!

Youtube: Animated Week in Review: April 14-19, 2025

Substack is an invaluable platform for me, especially given the uncertainties that come with being a staff editorial cartoonist. While I remain optimistic about my future, I am acutely aware of the unfortunate layoffs and newspaper closures that have impacted many talented colleagues in our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will always be free. Thank you for your continued support!