MacKay - Canadian Editorial Cartoons
mackaycartoons

Graeme MacKay's Editorial Cartoon Archive

  • Who?
  • Copyright
  • Boutique
  • Kings & Queens
  • Prime Ministers
  • Presidents
  • The French Monarchy Project
  • DOWNLOADS

security

Wednesday June 18, 2025

June 18, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Trump's early departure from the G7 Summit raises questions about U.S. commitment to global affairs and leaves other leaders to navigate critical discussions without him.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday June 18, 2025

Published also in The Toronto Star, and on Politico Europe.

Trump’s G7 Exit: Same Play, Different Day

Donald Trump’s early exit from the 2025 G7 Summit in Kananaskis serves as a reminder that this tendency is not new. It resurrects questions about the United States’ engagement in global affairs under his leadership, highlighting a pattern of ambiguity that has characterized Trump’s presidency and its impact on international relations.

June 9, 2018

From his abrupt departure during the 2018 Canadian-hosted summit to leaving the recent G7 meeting, Trump’s actions often puzzle observers and allies alike. The official reason for his hasty exit—the escalating Middle East conflict—contrasts sharply with his stated disinterest in negotiating peace, leaving the international community in a state of uncertainty about America’s role in the crisis between Iran and Israel.

Opinion: Even when he’s smiling, Trump stands apart

The G7 summit in Kananaskis sees U.S. President Donald Trump as the focal point amidst critical discussions on trade and global stability, with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney steering diplomatic efforts.

June 13, 2025

The summit in Kananaskis, hosted by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, aimed to address pressing global challenges, including the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy sought international support for tougher measures against Russia, amidst Trump’s approval of limited military aid to Ukraine. However, Trump’s absence from direct discussions with Zelenskyy underscores a missed opportunity for reaffirming U.S. commitment to Ukraine, further complicating diplomatic efforts.

This behaviour reflects a broader dilemma within U.S. foreign policy under Trump, fluctuating between the “America First” mantra that propelled him to power and the nation’s historic role as a leader in global affairs. The inconsistency creates an impression of a schizophrenic foreign policy, dictated by Trump’s immediate priorities and whims rather than a coherent strategy.

Analysis: For G7 leaders, immense global challenges weigh on agenda overshadowed by Trump

Canada must confront U.S. President-elect Donald Trump’s provocative meddling, including sovereignty-eroding rhetoric, damaging trade policies, and misogynistic attacks, with a coordinated and decisive response to reaffirm its independence and global standing.

December 19, 2024

Trade remained another contentious issue, with unresolved discussions, particularly between the U.S. and Japan, highlighting the complexities of international diplomacy. Japan sought relief from U.S. auto tariffs, while Canada and the U.S. worked towards finalizing a trade agreement within a month. Yet, Trump’s focus on domestic and Middle Eastern issues overshadowed potential agreements, leaving allies questioning the reliability of U.S. commitments.

For some leaders, Trump’s early exit might be a relief. It provides the remaining G6 an opportunity to engage in critical discussions without the unpredictability that often accompanies Trump’s presence. This “adults in the room” scenario allows other world leaders to address pressing security challenges and explore strategies to fill the void left by America’s inconsistent participation.

Opinion: The G7 is dead – time to move on to the G6

President Donald Trump's presence at the 2025 G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, is set to influence discussions on trade, climate, and global security.

June 12, 2025

Reader comments echo this sentiment, critiquing Trump’s erratic behaviour and its negative impact on U.S. soft power. His approach, often seen as self-centred and disruptive, challenges traditional alliances and complicates diplomatic efforts. It leaves allies questioning the reliability of U.S. commitments and pondering their own strategies to navigate an uncertain geopolitical landscape.

As the world watches, the broader implications of Trump’s actions remain to be seen. The G7 Summit’s outcome, in the absence of U.S. leadership, may well reflect new alliances and strategies, redefining global cooperation in an era where traditional roles are increasingly blurred. Whether this signals a temporary shift or a longer-term realignment remains an open question, driven by the unpredictable nature of Trump’s presidency.


Boltin’ Donny Trump

At the 2025 G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Donald Trump’s early exit amidst rising tensions in the Middle East has raised serious concerns. His departure left important issues, like support for Ukraine, unaddressed.

While some leaders may have welcomed the break from his unpredictability, this pattern shows a lack of commitment to global cooperation. Why the rush home? Can’t he trust his team to handle things at home for just a few hours while he engages with world leaders?

The truth is, multilateralism isn’t Trump’s style. His “America First” approach often clashes with the teamwork necessary in today’s world. As tensions grow between Israel and Iran, we must ask: Is this the leadership we need?

We need leaders who focus on dialogue and understanding, not quick exits.

If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for June 18, 2025, below!

YouTube: https://youtu.be/KyMjyvCiHWg

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Posted in: Canada, International, USA Tagged: 2025-12, Canada, diplomacy, Donald Trump, Emmanuel Macron, Friedrich Merz, G7, Giorgia Meloni, International, Kananaskis, Keir Starmer, leadership, Mark Carney, middle east, security, Shigeru Ishiba, summit

Tuesday June 10 2025

June 10, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Canada commits $9 billion to defence spending to address global threats and align with NATO expectations, while balancing national interests.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday June 10 2025

Canada’s Bold Move: Strengthening Defense Amid Global Pressures

May 7, 2025

This week, Canada has taken a significant step in shaping its defence strategy as Prime Minister Mark Carney announced a $9 billion investment in military spending, with a commitment to meet NATO’s 2% GDP target this year. This decision reflects Canada’s dedication to strengthening its military capabilities in response to rising global tensions, particularly from countries like Russia and China, which have been expanding their military power. These challenges necessitate a robust defence posture from Canada.

News: Carney to announce Canada’s defence spending will hit NATO’s target of 2% of GDP this fiscal year, sources say

At the same time, Canada’s move is influenced by ongoing pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump, who has been vocal about NATO allies increasing their defence budgets. Trump’s focus on military might is evident not only on the world stage but also at home, with his use of the National Guard to address protests and the upcoming military parade for his birthday. These actions highlight the expectation that allies like Canada share the burden of defence spending.

January 16, 2020

Interestingly, the pressure from Trump seems to echo the tactics used by leaders like Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, who often wield their influence through displays of strength. For Canada, aligning with these demands means finding a balance between meeting international obligations and looking after national interests. Carney’s investment is not just a reaction to outside pressures; it’s a strategic move to ensure that Canada remains a capable and committed player on the global stage.

News: NATO to back 5% spending target in June, Secretary-General says

By focusing on enhancing military readiness and boosting the Canadian defence industry, Carney’s government aims to secure Canada’s future while maintaining its independence. This includes reforms in military procurement and the use of domestic resources like Canadian steel and aluminum, reducing reliance on the U.S., and strengthening ties with European allies.

As Canada takes this path, it’s important to support policies that reflect our values and commitment to security. This investment in defence will help ensure that Canada remains respected and influential in a world where power displays are on the rise.


A few thoughts about where we stand with our international security commitments. It’s no secret that Canada has been lagging in this area for a while now.

Our self-defence capabilities have weakened to the point where it’s hard to see how we can be a credible force in helping defend others when we can barely defend ourselves.

That said, I’m looking at Prime Minister Mark Carney’s recent commitments with a lot of hope. I’m cautiously optimistic about this new leadership and what it could mean for our defence posture. It’s definitely about results at this point, and I’m hoping Carney can deliver.

It’s interesting timing, isn’t it? Just ahead of the G7 meeting we’re hosting and right before the big NATO summit where talk of spending is heating up from 2% to 5%. And let’s not forget, it’s Trump’s birthday week, culminating in that over-the-top military parade. It feels like we’re all putting on a bit of a show right now.

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2025-11, Canada, China, Defence, Donald Trump, facade, Global, influence, investment, Mark Carney, military, NATO, parade, Russia, security, sovereignty, spending, tank, threats

Friday May 30 2025

May 30, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Canada firmly rejects Trump’s rhetoric of annexation as it seeks diversified defence partnerships with Europe, emphasizing sovereignty and strategic autonomy.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday May 30 2025

Published in the Toronto Star.

Canada’s Sovereignty is Not for Sale: Rejecting Trump’s 51st State Rhetoric

Canada elects Mark Carney to lead a minority government, signaling a rejection of Trump's influence and a commitment to national sovereignty.

April 30, 2025

In the latest saga of U.S.-Canada relations, President Donald Trump’s proposal for Canada to join the Golden Dome missile defence system has rekindled an age-old narrative that Canada could become the 51st state of the United States. This rhetoric, used as a bargaining chip to pressure Canada into a costly defence scheme, is not only disrespectful but fundamentally undermines the sovereignty of our nation.

Trump’s proposition—demanding that Canada pay a hefty US$61 billion for participation in the Golden Dome unless we concede to annexation—has been aptly described by Canadian UN Ambassador Bob Rae as akin to a “protection racket.” This comparison highlights the absurdity of the offer: pay an exorbitant fee for defence collaboration or lose our national identity. Such a proposal is not only offensive but also dismissive of Canada’s autonomy and history as a sovereign nation.

News: Senior Canadian diplomat calls Trump’s latest pitch to join missile defence system a ‘protection racket’

Canada, Pierre Poilievre, Donald Trump, Mark Carney, Liberation Day, tariffs, Canada, auto, trade, economy, leadership, "maple MAGA", politics, strategy, allegations, election

April 2, 2025

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s refusal to engage in public negotiations over this matter is a wise move, emphasizing that Canada is “not for sale” and “won’t be for sale, ever.” The rhetoric of annexation not only echoes historical overreach but also disregards the reality of Canada as a proud, independent country.

As the world faces escalating global threats, Canada recognizes the need to bolster its defence capabilities. The government has already committed to increasing defence spending, aiming to reach NATO’s target of 2% of GDP by 2030. However, the beneficiaries of this defence investment are shifting. Canada is looking eastward, toward Europe, rather than southward to the U.S., as it considers joining the ReArm Europe initiative. This strategic pivot is not merely a snub to the U.S. military-industrial complex; it is a calculated decision to diversify our defence partnerships and strengthen our domestic military industry.

ReArm Europe offers Canada the opportunity to collaborate with European allies, buying military equipment at competitive prices and providing a new market for Canadian defence products. This move allows Canada to reduce its reliance on the United States, which currently receives 75% of our defence procurement spending. By investing in non-traditional partners, Canada is not only enhancing its military capabilities but also asserting its economic independence and strategic autonomy.

News: Golden Dome? ReArm Europe? Canada negotiating military relationships amid trade war, sovereignty concerns

Pierre Poilievre sets a 2% GDP defence target by 2030, aligning with Mark Carney's similar commitment to enhance Canada's military spending.

April 23, 2025

Moreover, public sentiment reflects a growing disillusionment with Trump’s tactics. Many Canadians, as seen in reader comments, are frustrated with the idea of being coerced into a defence arrangement under the guise of annexation or economic pressure. The rhetoric of becoming a 51st state is not only unrealistic but also dismissive of Canada’s rich heritage and commitment to sovereign equality, principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter.

Canada’s path forward involves strengthening our defence through diversified partnerships and robust domestic investment. While we recognize the importance of collaboration with allies, it must be on terms that respect our sovereignty and strategic interests. Trump’s rhetoric is a reminder of the necessity to stand firm in our national identity and reject any proposals that compromise our independence. Canada’s future will be defined by partnerships that respect mutual interests, not by yielding to outdated and disrespectful notions of annexation.


Canada’s Defence Awakening: Beyond the Umbrella – Friday May 30, 2025

Posted to Substack

These are indeed interesting times for Canada, as the nation begins to recognize the importance of strengthening its defence capabilities. This was a central promise made to voters when they entrusted the newly led Liberal party with governance. Amidst the tense dynamics between Canada and the U.S., Trump’s questioning of Canadian sovereignty has unexpectedly served as a catalyst. It has prompted Canada to take its defence more seriously, encouraging us to step out from under the U.S. security umbrella and arm ourselves independently. Canadians seem to have accepted this reality, understanding that while we bolster our defences, there might be sacrifices in social spending elsewhere—but that’s a topic for another cartoon.

Canada must enhance efforts to meet NATO’s 2% defence spending target, reinforcing its obligations and commitments to global security.

Friday March 1, 2024 – More than a year ago, Canada’s Liberal government had not prioritized defence spending, focusing on its political standing during declining popularity, but escalating global tensions have since pressured Canada to balance domestic social investments with meeting NATO commitments.

In today’s cartoon, the scene unfolds at an arms Expo. On one side, European vendors display traditional military gear—jets, tanks, missiles—all in the familiar army green. On the opposite side, Trump’s “Golden Dome” gleams ostentatiously, with a sign that reads, “Just $61B or Become a State and It’s FREE*,” complete with a cheeky nod to terms and conditions. The humour lies in the absurdity of Trump’s offer and the fanciful price tag seemingly pulled from his bum.

Wednesday, October 13, 2010 – After Canada lost its bid for a UN Security Council seat to Portugal, the Conservative government blamed Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff for undermining their campaign, while Ignatieff criticized the government’s foreign policy, calling the loss a “sad day” and dismissing their blame as “ridiculous.”

What brings satisfaction is seeing Mark Carney adeptly handle this situation. Unlike his predecessor, he confidently asserts that Canada’s sovereignty empowers us to seek partnerships beyond the U.S., enhancing our defence strategy with new allies. The longstanding post-war security guarantee from the U.S. is essentially over, and while this means Canada is cut loose, it also liberates us from over-reliance on the U.S. military-industrial complex. This shift allows Canada to forge its own path in defence, enriched by diverse collaborations.

Posted in: Canada Tagged: "Golden Dome", 2025-11, 51st state, annexation, autonomy, Canada, Defence, Defense, Donald Trump, Europe, expo, huckster, Independence, Mark Carney, military, NATO, partnerships, Pete Hegseth, ReArm Europe, security, sovereignty

Thursday May 22 2025

May 22, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Canada opts for Australia's JORN radar system over Trump's "Golden Dome," focusing on independent defensc strategy amid strained U.S. relations.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday May 22 2025

Shilling a Missile Defence System

May 21, 2025

In light of President Donald Trump’s recent introduction of the “Golden Dome” missile defence scheme, there’s a lot of skepticism. We’ve seen similar programs before, and they’ve often been met with doubts about their practicality, cost, and strategic benefit.

Back in 2005, Canada chose not to join a U.S.-led missile defence initiative, largely because of concerns about sovereignty, financial costs, and the risk of increased militarization. Those concerns are still relevant today, especially with our current relationship with the U.S. under Trump being quite strained.

Archival News: Canada Says It Won’t Join Missile Shield With the U.S.

Trump's second term promises a new golden age for the privileged few, marked by policies that deepen economic divides and threaten global stability, leaving the masses in potential misery.

January 18, 2025

Trump’s claim that Canada is eager to join the “Golden Dome” seems more like political posturing than a reflection of our actual defence priorities. Investing billions in a system that might not even materialize is risky, particularly when we have more immediate defence needs to address.

Given the changes in our relationship with the U.S., marked by trade disputes and Trump’s controversial rhetoric, it’s important for Canada to take a different approach. We should politely decline participation in the “Golden Dome” and focus on upgrading our own defence systems to directly enhance our national security.

News: Canada wants to join Golden Dome missile-defence program, Trump says

Canada elects Mark Carney to lead a minority government, signaling a rejection of Trump's influence and a commitment to national sovereignty.

April 30, 2025

Our partnership with Australia for the Jindalee Operational Radar Network (JORN) is a great example of this strategy. This collaboration not only diversifies our military procurement but also strengthens our ties with countries that share similar values. The JORN system provides proven, advanced radar capabilities that are perfect for Canada’s needs, especially in the Arctic.

News: Canada partners with Australia on radar system to detect threats from Russia and China

If there’s one positive outcome from Trump’s actions towards allies, it’s that Canada is learning to rely less on the U.S. and pursue partnerships that truly align with our national interests.

Investing in systems like JORN is a smart use of our defence resources, ensuring Canada remains secure, independent, and strategically sound in a complex world.


From Star Wars to DOGE Wars

Here we go again with Missile Defense. Donald Trump has revived a concept reminiscent of Ronald Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) from the mid-1980s, which aimed to make incoming missiles “impotent and obsolete.” Dubbed “Star Wars” by the media, it seemed inspired by the era’s popular sci-fi films like “The Empire Strikes Back” and “Return of the Jedi.”

This time around, Trump has not called upon the scientific community—the very sector of innovation that he and Elon Musk have rendered “impotent and obsolete” themselves, thanks to the massive DOGE chainsaw massacre they’ve unleashed on the federal civil service and science funding.

Trump optimistically believes that a missile defence solution will materialize before his term ends in three years. While missile defence has notably benefited Israel, shielding it from regional threats, the North American continent presents a far more complex challenge.

Although Reagan’s challenge led to some technological advancements, the dissolution of the USSR, rather than SDI, primarily eased global military tensions. Following the Soviet collapse, the urgency for missile defence subsided. When George W. Bush proposed a similar initiative, Canada, under Paul Martin, declined, echoing the earlier decision under Jean Chrétien to distance from the U.S. invasion of Iraq. These decisions drew a line in the alliance with the U.S., but also highlighted Canada’s failure to boost its own defence investments.

Canada Says It Won’t Join Missile Shield With the U.S. (Cartoon from February 25, 2005) The Canadian government declined to participate in the North American missile defense system, despite President George W. Bush’s lobbying efforts, marking a symbolic setback for the Bush administration as it attempted to mend relations with allies post-Iraq invasion.

Instead, Canada fell short of its NATO commitments under both Harper and Trudeau, leaving it unprepared as the post-WWII security umbrella provided by the U.S. began to retract. Now, as the U.S. pushes us away, Canada must strengthen its own defences, recognizing that a military partnership with the U.S. will not be what it once was.

Importantly, Canada has invested in the Australian Jindalee Operational Radar Network (JORN), a system that enhances long-range surveillance and defence capabilities. This partnership with Australia signifies a strategic shift towards diversifying defence alliances and technologies, reflecting Canada’s need to independently bolster its security measures.

A continental defence system involving Canada is crucial, but procurement won’t always serve to bolster the U.S. military-industrial complex. The economic costs of Canada’s gradual detachment from America’s security framework must be understood by both nations as they navigate this new era.

Substack is an invaluable platform for me, especially given the uncertainties that come with being a staff editorial cartoonist. While I remain optimistic about my future, I am acutely aware of the unfortunate layoffs and newspaper closures that have impacted many talented colleagues in our field.
Please have a look at the animated making of video (it’s just 34 seconds long):

Posted in: Canada, USA Tagged: "Golden Dome", 2025-10, Arctic, Australia, autonomy, Canada, Defense, diversification, investment, JORN, partnership, radar, relations, security, sovereignty, Trump

Wednesday April 23, 2025

April 22, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Pierre Poilievre sets a 2% GDP defence target by 2030, aligning with Mark Carney's similar commitment to enhance Canada's military spending.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday April 23, 2025

Canada’s Quiet Resolve in Strengthening Defence Amid Global Uncertainty

Canada must enhance efforts to meet NATO’s 2% defence spending target, reinforcing its obligations and commitments to global security.

March 1, 2024

In the ever-shifting landscape of global politics, where alliances are tested and national interests recalibrated, Canada finds itself at a pivotal juncture. Recent events and political shifts have underscored a growing realization among NATO member countries, including Canada, that bolstering military capabilities is not just a response to external pressures, but a strategic necessity for a world where traditional security assurances can no longer be taken for granted.

The backdrop to this realization is a United States led by President Donald Trump, whose rhetoric and actions have raised concerns about America’s commitment to global security frameworks established post-World War II. Trump’s calls for NATO allies to increase defence spending to five percent of GDP, though seemingly about shared burden, mask a deeper unease about the U.S.’s role as a reliable security partner. Trump’s annexation rhetoric concerning Canada and Greenland, while alarming, reflects an unpredictable approach to international relations that has left many allies wary.

News: Trump wants NATO to spend 5% on defence. What do Canada party leaders say?

January 12, 2022

Canada, traditionally seen as a steadfast partner within NATO, has faced criticism for not meeting the alliance’s defence spending target of two percent of GDP. Yet, there’s a nuanced understanding emerging among Canadian political leaders. Both Liberal Leader Mark Carney and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre have now committed to reaching the two percent target by 2030, aligning their strategies to ensure Canada’s sovereignty and security in an increasingly unstable world. This alignment signifies a shared recognition of the importance of enhancing military capabilities amidst global uncertainties.

This decision reflects a pragmatic approach to defence policy. Canada recognizes that in a world where the U.S. might retreat from its role as a global security guarantor, it must step up to ensure its own defence readiness. The focus is on modernizing the military, securing the Arctic, and investing in cutting-edge technologies like AI and quantum computing, all while maintaining fiscal responsibility.

News: Mark Carney unveils a plan to Trump-proof Canada

July 12, 2018

Canada’s resolve to meet NATO commitments “on its own terms” is emblematic of a broader trend among NATO members. Many countries are recalibrating their defence policies not just due to external pressures from the U.S., but because of the realization that global threats are multifaceted. The unpredictability of a U.S. administration dismissive of trade and military alliances only adds to the urgency.

In this context, Canada’s approach is both sensible and strategic. It is about strengthening defence capabilities while fostering unity and consensus among political leaders. The decision to bolster military spending is not about succumbing to external demands but about safeguarding national interests in a changing global order.

As Canada moves forward, the focus should remain on maintaining a balanced approach that prioritizes security, economic stability, and diplomatic engagement. By doing so, Canada can navigate the complexities of international relations with resilience and resolve, ensuring its place as a respected and reliable partner on the world stage.


PPs 2% Promise

I’ve been closely following Pierre Poilievre’s approach to Canada’s NATO obligations, and his recent commitment to the 2% GDP defence target by 2030 has caught my attention. Until last week’s debate, Poilievre hadn’t specified a timeline, often critiquing the Liberals’ fluctuating target dates between 2028 and 2034 over the past couple of years without presenting his own. Now, it turns out his target aligns precisely with the Liberals’ plan, even as countries worldwide are exceeding the 2% benchmark.

Interestingly, Poilievre’s decision to announce this commitment late in the campaign suggests strategic timing. It’s likely not a stance that would be met with overwhelming enthusiasm, especially within his own party, where it could be quite polarizing. Let’s face it, bolstering defence—even amid increased threats—isn’t high on the average voter’s priority list, particularly with the cost of living crisis intensifying as Trump ramps up tariffs.

This revelation suggests that Poilievre might not be as hawkish as many believed. His mealy mouthed attitude toward supporting Ukraine’s struggle against Putin tyranny is a chief indicator of this for another day. While he shares Trump’s scepticism towards international agreements and multilateralism, evidenced by his rare mention of the Paris Accord, his reticence on NATO commitments raises questions. Nevertheless, he acknowledges the need to strengthen Canada’s military, including against potential U.S. threats.

Historically, Canada’s Conservative Party has championed robust military and defence policies. Yet, in the era of Donald Trump, who demands a 5% GDP commitment to NATO, one might expect Canadian conservatives to follow suit. Instead, Poilievre’s proposal mirrors the Liberals’, aiming for 2030, which I find both intriguing and somewhat lacking.

While I often see parallels between Canadian conservatives and Trump’s Republicans, this divergence is significant. The traditional hawks within Canada’s Conservative Party appear to have less influence, a point worth noting. When it comes to defence, the differences between Canada’s two major parties offered to voters are strikingly similar.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 23, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

PPs 2% Promise https://youtu.be/7QXYW_dp024

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2025-08, Arctic, Canada, Defence, Donald Trump, GDP, Marco Rubio, military, NATO, Pierre Poilievre, policy, security, sovereignty, spending, stability, strategy, Substack, unity
« Previous 1 2 3 4 … 11 Next »
...Check it out and please subscribe!

Your one-stop-MacKay-shop…

T-shirts, hoodies, clocks, duvet covers, mugs, stickers, notebooks, smart phone cases and scarfs

2023 Coronation Design
Follow Graeme's board My Own Cartoon Favourites on Pinterest.

MacKay’s Virtual Gallery

Copyright © 2016 mackaycartoons.net

Powered by Wordpess and Alpha.

DMCA.com Protection Status
Loading Comments...