MacKay - Canadian Editorial Cartoons
mackaycartoons

Graeme MacKay's Editorial Cartoon Archive

  • Who?
  • Copyright
  • Boutique
  • Kings & Queens
  • Prime Ministers
  • Presidents
  • The French Monarchy Project
  • DOWNLOADS

USA

Wednesday August 6, 2025

August 6, 2025 by Graeme MacKay
As wildfires rage and smoke fills the skies, the consequences of sidelining climate change in policy become starkly evident.

August 6, 2025

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday August 6, 2025

Also cited in The Daily Cartoonist. Also in The Week.

Smoke Screens and Climate Realities: Confronting the Consequences of Our Choices

June 21, 2024

In recent years, North American populations have faced the undeniable and unprecedented impacts of wildfires. Smoke from these fires, originating largely in Canada, has become an unwelcome summer norm, affecting air quality across borders, including in places like Michigan. This has prompted some, like Congressman Tom Barrett, to place blame squarely on Canada for failing to manage its forests effectively. Yet, this perspective overlooks the broader, more complex reality we face—a reality shaped by our collective disregard for climate science and environmental stewardship.

The intensification of wildfires is not solely a result of poor forest management. Rising global temperatures and shifting precipitation patterns have created drier conditions, making vast areas more susceptible to wildfires. These climatic shifts, driven by human-induced climate change, have long been predicted by scientists. They warned us of increasing frequencies of natural disasters, from wildfires to the atmospheric rivers causing record floods and extreme weather events.

News: Trump’s EPA now says greenhouse gases don’t endanger people

July 29, 2023

Compounding this issue is the troubling trend of erasing “climate change” from the U.S. policy lexicon. During previous administrations, there was a concerted effort to remove or downplay references to climate change in official documents and communications, including those of the EPA. This linguistic shift was not just semantic but symbolic of a broader reluctance to confront the realities of climate change head-on. By sidelining the very language that defines our environmental crisis, policymakers undermined efforts to develop comprehensive strategies to address the root causes of these disasters.

While there are indeed actions that can be taken to mitigate the fires—such as strategic forest management, better early detection systems, and increased collaboration with indigenous communities—these measures address only the symptoms of a much larger problem. The root causes lie in our continued reliance on fossil fuels and the political inertia that has stalled meaningful climate action.

Critics who deny climate change or downplay its effects, like Tom Barrett, contribute to a dangerous cycle of inaction and deflection. Instead of addressing the underlying issues, they point fingers and bury their heads in the sand, ignoring the science and the urgent calls for change. This denial perpetuates a status quo where economic interests often overshadow environmental imperatives, leaving future generations to bear the brunt of our shortsightedness.

News: Smoke Prompts Air Quality Alerts From Central Canada to the Northeastern U.S.

June 8, 2023

The smoke that blankets our skies is a tangible reminder of the consequences of ignoring climate warnings. It affects our health, our environment, and our way of life. Yet, it also serves as a call to action—a signal that it’s time to pivot from denial to proactive engagement with the realities of climate change.

Humanity is now reaping what it has sown by ignoring the warnings of scientists and environmentalists. The smoke, the floods, and the rising temperatures are all part of the same narrative: a narrative that underscores the urgent need for comprehensive climate policies and a shift towards sustainable practices.

In acknowledging the interconnectedness of these issues, we must also recognize that the solutions lie not in isolation but in collective action. It is time to heed the warnings, to embrace the science, and to commit to the changes necessary to safeguard our planet for future generations. The smoke may serve as a stark reminder of our past choices, but it is also a catalyst for change—a chance to rewrite the story of our environmental legacy.


Blame Canada

In recent years, North American populations have been forced to confront the impacts of wildfires like never before. While critics can complain that the smoke from Canadian wildfires needs to be controlled by Canada, there are indeed actions that can be taken to mitigate the fires causing the smoke. However, it’s crucial to understand that these fires’ occurrences and intensities are unprecedented and directly result from rising temperatures and changing precipitation patterns, which create drier conditions more susceptible to wildfires. The same applies to atmospheric rivers causing record floods and extreme weather.

Scientists have long warned us of future calamities, yet the denial, finger-pointing, and head-in-the-sand attitude of climate-denying politicians like Tom Barrett continue. It’s outrageous how some ideologues reject the scientific community’s consensus on climate change, using their power to dismiss science as if it were witchcraft and black magic imposed on the old model of unbridled capitalism. We must move beyond this denial and recognize the urgent need for action and cooperation to address these growing challenges.

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2025-14, air quality, Canada, conservationClimate change, denial, Donald Trump, EPA, Green New Deal, Paris Agreement, policy, Renewable Energy, smoke, sustainability, USA, wildfires

Friday August 1, 2025

August 1, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Canada recognizes Palestinian statehood, defying U.S. pressure, as part of a renewed commitment to global engagement and peace efforts in the Middle East.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday August 1, 2025

Canada’s Role in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: A Necessary Stand for Justice and Peace

January 11, 2016

In recent weeks, the international community has witnessed a significant shift as countries like Canada, France, and the UK take decisive steps to recognize Palestinian statehood. This move, though largely symbolic given the longstanding global recognition of Palestine, is an essential gesture in addressing the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and pushing for a two-state solution.

As a member of the G7, Canada has a responsibility to assert its position independently from the United States, particularly as the latter appears increasingly disengaged from constructive global leadership. President Trump’s administration, which threatens to retaliate against Canada with economic force through tariffs, has shown reluctance to acknowledge the dire situation in Gaza, further complicating diplomatic efforts. In this context, Canada’s recognition of Palestinian statehood sends a crucial message to Israeli leadership, particularly to Prime Minister Netanyahu, that the international community will not condone the ongoing blockade and humanitarian crisis.

News: Canada’s plan to recognize Palestinian statehood prompts swift, divided reaction

December 4, 2019

Critics argue that recognizing Palestinian statehood rewards terrorism, a claim that oversimplifies the complex realities on the ground. Much like not all Palestinians are terrorists, not all Israelis support policies that lead to accusations of genocide. The path to peace and prosperity lies in a two-state solution, a sentiment shared by many who support Israel yet are horrified by the suffering in Gaza. The recent calls from Arab states for Hamas to relinquish power, coupled with growing international recognition of Palestine, provide a glimmer of hope for a just peace.

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s decision is a courageous step, aligning Canada with over 147 countries that recognize Palestinian sovereignty. This is not about diminishing Israel’s security but about advocating for a future where both Israelis and Palestinians can coexist peacefully. It emphasizes that endless cycles of violence and deprivation cannot continue.

News: Trump says Canada’s Palestinian move is new trade deal stumbling block

December 1, 2012

Carney has framed this decision as part of Canada’s effort to re-engage in global affairs after years of perceived inactivity. As a G7 country, Canada has a role to play in international diplomacy and peace-building, and this move signals a renewed commitment to those responsibilities.

The unfolding international strategy on Gaza marks a departure from ineffective shuttle diplomacy. It is a coordinated effort that seeks to address the root causes of the conflict, including the humanitarian needs of Palestinians and the political realities in Israel. This approach offers a chance to end the senseless violence, release hostages, and potentially bring about political change in the region.

In taking this stand, Canada not only aligns with international law and human rights but also supports a vision for the Middle East where peace, democracy, and mutual recognition prevail. Despite the economic threats posed by the U.S., Canada’s decision underscores its commitment to moral leadership and the belief that international diplomacy should not be swayed by economic intimidation. It is a move that acknowledges the complexity of the conflict and the need for a balanced approach that holds all parties accountable while fostering hope for a peaceful resolution.


Support for Palestinian Statehood

I’ve been really careful in forming my views on the Middle East, especially considering how this current chapter in the ancient Israeli-Palestinian conflict started on October 7, when innocent Israelis were brutally attacked by Hamas terrorists. These acts of terror haven’t stopped, with hostages being taken and innocent Palestinians being used as human shields in Gaza.

There’s no doubt that Hamas’s control severely worsens the situation for innocent people in Gaza, just as much as the Israeli blockade does. The destruction in Gaza is heartbreaking, with too many lives lost and famine taking an unnecessary toll on innocent Gazans.

The efforts by leaders like Carney, Starmer, and Macron to support Palestinian statehood might seem symbolic and driven by their own domestic pressures. Realistically, the U.S. and Israel aren’t going to agree to statehood anytime soon, and any such move will likely get shut down by Trump’s veto in the Security Council. But I have to give credit where it’s due—these leaders are at least sending a signal, even if it seems like a fantasy. It took guts, and honestly, it’s a lot better than the nothingness Canadians have gotten used to when it comes to our stance on the Middle East.

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2025-14, Canada, crisis, diplomacy, Donald Trump, Emmanuel Macron, France, Gaza, humanitarian, Israel, Keir Starmer, king kong, Mark Carney, Palestine, statehood, tariffs, Trade, UK, USA

Saturday July 26, 2025

July 26, 2025 by Graeme MacKay
Global leaders criticize the U.S. for its lack of action and continued support for Israel amidst the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, urging decisive intervention.

July 26, 2025

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday July 26, 2025

Also published in the Korea Times, and The Week.

Starvation in Gaza: A Crisis Exacerbated by Political Posturing

Donald Trump’s second-term rhetoric and policies signal a shift from isolationism to economic and territorial expansionism, challenging global stability and international norms.

February 7, 2025

As the world grapples with the unfolding humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, the focus of political leaders and media in the United States remains unsettlingly misaligned. The crisis, marked by severe starvation and the desperate plight of innocent civilians, is being exacerbated by political posturing that seems more concerned with preserving the delicate perceptions of leaders like Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu than addressing the urgent needs of those suffering.

The situation in Gaza is dire, with reports of children and vulnerable populations facing starvation and malnutrition. The blockade, coupled with chaotic and insufficient aid distribution, has left thousands in peril. Yet, despite the gravity of the crisis, the response from key international players, particularly the United States, has been disappointing.

News: Gazans Are Dying of Starvation

Trump's "America First" policy is straining alliances and diminishing U.S. global leadership, while unilateral actions risk undermining international cooperation.

February 5, 2025

During Trump’s previous term, supporters praised him for avoiding new wars and maintaining a semblance of stability in the Middle East. However, the current administration’s approach to the Gaza crisis tells a different story. The U.S. has swiftly acted in other scenarios, such as taking out Iranian nuclear facilities, showing that decisive action is possible when perceived national interests are at stake. But in Gaza, where the lives of innocent civilians hang in the balance, that same urgency is conspicuously absent.

Trump’s unwavering support for Netanyahu has translated into a tacit endorsement of policies that have exacerbated the suffering in Gaza. The U.S. withdrawal from ceasefire talks and the lack of pressure on Israel to alleviate the humanitarian conditions reflect a troubling abdication of responsibility. Meanwhile, the President’s focus has been diverted to domestic scandals, such as the Epstein case, leaving Congress on recess and Trump himself off to Scotland for a holiday.

This neglect is not just a failure of political leadership; it is a moral failing that undermines America’s role as a global leader advocating for human rights and stability. The callous disregard for the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, amid political distractions and alliances, stands in stark contrast to the values that the United States has traditionally upheld.

Analysis : As the Epstein saga rages, Trump is getting a pass on his role in the building famine in Gaza

As Russia intensifies its brutal assault on Ukraine, U.S. President Donald Trump makes a rare condemnation of Vladimir Putin—leaving the world uncertain whether this marks a true shift or another erratic turn in his long, troubling admiration for authoritarian power.

July 10, 2025

International leaders have not remained silent. Emmanuel Macron, President of France, has announced France’s intention to recognize a Palestinian state, directly challenging the status quo and signalling disapproval of the ongoing blockade and military actions in Gaza. Keir Starmer, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, has condemned the situation as “unspeakable” and a “humanitarian catastrophe,” urging for a stronger international response. Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada, has criticized the obstruction of humanitarian aid and emphasized the need for international agencies to manage aid distribution, calling the situation a violation of international law.

These leaders’ voices counter the familiar lines of defence used by the U.S. to justify its support for Netanyahu’s regime. They emphasize the importance of a balanced and fair response that prioritizes humanitarian needs and respects international law.

The world watches as innocents die of starvation in Gaza, a tragedy compounded by the indifference and inaction of those in power. The international community must demand accountability and action, urging leaders to prioritize humanitarian needs over political alliances and distractions. The time for mere expressions of outrage has passed; what is needed now is decisive, compassionate action to prevent further loss of life and to uphold the principles of human dignity and justice.


Beyond the Noise: Gaza’s Cry for Urgent Action

In the midst of the mid-summer media frenzy, where scandals and celebrity news often overshadow pressing global issues, the humanitarian crisis in Gaza remains a glaring and urgent matter demanding our attention. While the Jeffrey Epstein files and their potential connections to Donald Trump are undeniably significant and warrant thorough investigation, they have become part of a recurrent cycle of scandals that, despite shocking evidence, rarely shift public sentiment or lead to meaningful accountability. The American electorate has shown a remarkable resilience—or perhaps indifference—to these controversies, often allowing them to fade into the background noise of political discourse.

Meanwhile, the tragic deaths of cultural icons like Ozzy Osbourne and Hulk Hogan have captured headlines, yet these stories, though poignant, serve as a distraction from the real crises unfolding around the world. The staggering reality is that in Gaza, over 114 people have already succumbed to starvation, and nearly 900,000 children are facing hunger, with 70,000 suffering from malnutrition. This is not just another news cycle story; it is a humanitarian emergency that demands immediate and decisive action.

As global leaders like Emmanuel Macron, Keir Starmer, and Mark Carney have highlighted, the situation in Gaza is a moral imperative that transcends political alliances and distractions. It is a call to action for the international community to step up and prioritize human dignity and justice over political posturing and media sensationalism. The U.S., in particular, must reassess its stance and recognize its responsibility to advocate for humanitarian relief and a balanced approach to the crisis.

In a world filled with noise, let us not lose sight of the voices crying out for help. It is time to shift our focus to where it is most needed and to act with compassion and urgency to address the suffering in Gaza. History will judge us not by the scandals we obsessed over, but by the lives we saved and the humanity we upheld.

Posted in: USA Tagged: 2025-14, blockade, crisis, Donald Trump, famine, Gaza, golf, humanitarian, Israel, Jeffery Epstein, media, priorities, Scotland, starvation, USA

Wednesday July 9, 2025

July 9, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Canada’s cancellation of the Digital Services Tax may look like a concession to Donald Trump, but it was a pragmatic step to scrap flawed policy and preserve crucial trade talks.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday July 9, 2025

Carney Folds a Bad Hand at the Right Time

August 4, 2023

As Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government announced the eleventh-hour cancellation of Canada’s long-planned Digital Services Tax (DST), many critics—predictably—rushed to frame the move as a capitulation, a humiliation, a sign of diplomatic incompetence. Robyn Urback, writing in The Globe and Mail, likened Carney’s posture to a “chicken dance,” accusing him of flapping and folding in the face of Donald Trump’s latest trade tantrum. The dominant narrative from opposition benches and comment threads alike is that Canada blinked, and that the Prime Minister sold out our integrity.

But this breathless critique misses the point—and badly overstates both the importance of the DST and the value of standing one’s ground for its sake.

Yes, the optics were less than ideal: a tax announced under the previous Trudeau government, long delayed and then abruptly cancelled the night before collections were to begin. Yes, it came in response to Trump’s inflammatory declaration on Truth Social that all trade talks with Canada would be suspended. But if you’re trying to conduct serious negotiations with an impulsive U.S. president who thrives on public shows of dominance, the smarter move isn’t to dig in—it’s to duck and deflect. That’s not cowardice. It’s strategic realism.

Opinion: The digital services tax was bad policy, but killing it now makes us look terribly weak

March 2, 2023

Even if you support taxing big tech—and many Canadians do—the DST was deeply flawed policy. It would have added a mere $1.4 billion annually to government revenue, while inviting retaliatory measures against more than $700 billion in goods and services Canada exports to the United States. Google had already begun passing costs onto Canadian advertisers. And perhaps most damning, the OECD is already in the late stages of crafting a multilateral digital tax agreement, expected in 2026 or 2027. Why rush into a go-it-alone tax that angers your largest trading partner and your own business community, for a short-term gain you might have to roll back anyway?

Critics argue Carney should have scrapped the tax months ago, and they’re not wrong. But to now say that its cancellation constitutes a diplomatic collapse stretches credulity. As one commenter noted, there’s no reason the DST couldn’t be reintroduced later—perhaps within a broader, OECD-aligned framework—if talks with the U.S. break down. What was needed in this moment wasn’t a grand gesture of defiance. It was a de-escalation.

Anyone who’s watched Donald Trump operate—through two presidential terms, global summits, and enough diplomatic ruptures to fill a trilogy—knows that he requires the perception of victory. He needs his headlines. He needs to say “I crushed the other guy.” This is how he negotiates, how he governs, how he breathes.

So if Canada can toss him a symbolic win—killing a policy we probably should have killed anyway—in exchange for getting trade talks back on track, then that’s not surrender. That’s tactical appeasement. It’s ducking now in order to land something more meaningful later: a durable, modernized Canada-U.S. trade and security agreement.

The Online News Act in Canada, a groundbreaking legislative framework securing fair compensation for news outlets from tech giants like Google and Meta, contrasts with the hot air of opposition leader Pierre Poilievre, who remains skeptical and resistant, raising concerns about fair terms, media sustainability, and the effectiveness of government agreements in shaping the news ecosystem.

December 1, 2023

Several reader comments got it exactly right. One wrote: “This whole debacle made us look weak and silly and humiliated. Never bluff.” But what if the bluff was inherited from the Trudeau government, already exposed, and the only move left was to fold gracefully and keep the game going? Another put it even more clearly: “Take the public opinion hit in the short term in order to get a signed agreement. It will be crowed about by the White House as a great triumph, but it will be a move towards getting the private sector investment we must have.”

News: What is Canada’s digital services tax and why is it infuriating Trump?

Carney understands the stakes here. The long-term survival of Canada’s economy depends not on sticking to a flawed tax, but on securing trade certainty, attracting investment, and avoiding unnecessary shocks. Sometimes that means letting the other guy do his victory lap.

Is it annoying to watch Trump crow about a “win” at Canada’s expense? Sure. Does it bruise the pride to see the White House press secretary say Canada “caved”? Absolutely. But if that moment of chest-thumping helps clear the path toward a real, grown-up agreement that protects Canadian jobs, industries, and sovereignty—then so be it.

There are bigger battles ahead. Carney would be wise to save his elbows-up posture for a hill that actually matters.

 

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2025-13, Canada, digital, Digital Services Tax, diplomacy, Mark Carney, negotiation, policy, tariffs, tax, tech, Trade, USA

Thursday June 19, 2025

June 19, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Amid escalating tensions in the Middle East, the assertive leadership styles of Netanyahu, Khamenei, and Trump raise concerns about the potential for conflict and the need for measured diplomacy.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday June 19, 2025

Also published in The Toronto Star.

Hotheads at the Helm: Navigating Middle East Turbulence

The fall of Assad’s regime in Syria marks a crushing blow to Putin and Iran, stripping them of a key ally and undermining their influence in the Middle East.

December 10, 2024

As tensions escalate in the Middle East, the spotlight turns to the leaders at the helm: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and U.S. President Donald Trump. Each of these figures brings a distinct style of leadership, characterized by assertiveness and, at times, unpredictability. In a region fraught with historical grievances and contemporary challenges, the stakes are high, and the need for steady, measured leadership has never been more critical.

Netanyahu’s recent shift in military strategy marks a departure from Israel’s long-standing policy of containment towards more aggressive actions against Iran and its proxies. While this approach aims to neutralize perceived threats, it also risks entrenching Israel further into prolonged conflict. Netanyahu’s decisive yet polarizing leadership style has drawn both support and criticism, reflecting the complex calculus of security and diplomacy in the region.

News: Here’s Donald Trump’s endgame in Iran

On the first anniversary of the war, Iran's continued backing of Hamas and Hezbollah underscores its role in prolonging the conflict and obstructing any path toward peace between Israel and Palestine.

Tuesday October 7, 2024

In Iran, Khamenei’s enduring defiance amid mounting pressures highlights his steadfast commitment to preserving the Islamic Republic’s ideological and strategic interests. However, his leadership faces significant challenges as Iran grapples with internal dissent and external threats. The current crisis tests the resilience of a regime built on a foundation of revolutionary fervour and regional influence.

Trump’s return to the presidency has reintroduced a brand of leadership that is both assertive and controversial. While his administration touts a strong stance against adversaries like Iran, critics argue that his approach lacks the nuance and diplomacy necessary for resolving complex international issues. The U.S., once a beacon of freedom and democracy, faces scrutiny under leadership perceived by some as divisive and unpredictable.

As battle lines are drawn, the world watches with bated breath, aware that the decisions made by these leaders could have far-reaching consequences. The volatile nature of the current leadership landscape underscores the importance of caution and diplomacy. Hotheaded decisions made in the heat of the moment could escalate conflicts, leading to unintended and potentially catastrophic outcomes.

Opinion: Iran War Reflects a Changed Middle East and a New Israeli Military Doctrine

Netanyahu’s military escalation may yield short-term successes, but without a shift toward diplomacy and a genuine commitment to addressing Palestinian grievances, the region risks spiralling into even greater chaos.

September 28, 2024

For the international community, the path forward requires a renewed commitment to dialogue and collaboration. Engaging with regional and global partners to address the root causes of conflict and promote stability is essential. Encouraging restraint and fostering an environment conducive to negotiation will be key to averting further escalation.

In these uncertain times, steady leadership is paramount. The challenges facing the Middle East demand leaders who can balance assertiveness with diplomacy, strength with compassion, and resolve with flexibility. It is through such leadership that the region can hope to navigate its way toward lasting peace and security.

As history has shown, the choices made by leaders today will shape the future for generations to come. The call for measured leadership is not just a plea for peace but a demand for responsible governance that prioritizes the well-being of all people in the region. Only then can the Middle East move beyond the cycle of conflict and towards a brighter, more stable future.


Gambling with World War III

Right now, the future of the Middle East—and potentially the world—rests with three of the most volatile leaders we could imagine: Benjamin Netanyahu, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and Donald Trump. Each of them is surrounded by folks eager for conflict and religious extremism, making this a truly nerve-wracking situation.

These aging leaders seem more interested in their legacies than in the well-being of nations and lives. Their actions threaten to tip the world into another crisis, as their inability to sit down and talk things out could set off a chain reaction of chaos.

This isn’t a game with any winners. The lives of countless people are in the hands of these three, and their next moves could lead to widespread suffering. We can only hope that someone, somewhere, finds a way to bring some sanity to the situation before it’s too late.

If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for June 19, 2025, below!

Posted in: International, USA Tagged: 2025-12, assertiveness., Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Benjamin Netanyahu, conflict, diplomacy, Donald Trump, escalation, Iran, Israel, leadership, military, negotiation, peace, security, stability, strategy, tensions, USA
« Previous 1 … 12 13 14 … 136 Next »
...Check it out and please subscribe!

Your one-stop-MacKay-shop…

T-shirts, hoodies, clocks, duvet covers, mugs, stickers, notebooks, smart phone cases and scarfs

2023 Coronation Design
Follow Graeme's board My Own Cartoon Favourites on Pinterest.

MacKay’s Virtual Gallery

Copyright © 2016 mackaycartoons.net

Powered by Wordpess and Alpha.

DMCA.com Protection Status
Loading Comments...