As Canada’s premiers gather in Muskoka with Prime Minister Mark Carney, the picturesque setting belies the serious challenges they face. Amid the bucolic charm of Deerhurst Resort, the nation’s leaders must grapple with an economic threat that transcends regional interests and partisan lines: U.S. President Donald Trump’s aggressive tariff stance.
The Trump administration’s looming 35% tariff on Canadian goods outside the USMCA framework poses a significant threat to our economy. It is a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities inherent in our relationship with a trading partner ten times our size. As negotiations continue, it is becoming increasingly clear that Canada needs a unified front to navigate these turbulent waters.
Canada’s vast geography and diverse regional interests have historically posed challenges to national unity. Disagreements over resource distribution, especially in the oil sector, and ongoing tensions with Indigenous communities further complicate the landscape. Yet, in the face of external pressures, there is a pressing need for consensus and collaboration.
While partisan sniping and regional roadblocks are ever-present, the current situation demands that provinces and the federal government find common ground. Recent progress in reducing internal trade barriers and fostering collaboration on national projects shows that unity is possible, but it requires deliberate effort and compromise.
Engagement with Indigenous communities is crucial. Their skepticism and resistance stem from legitimate concerns about rights and environmental impacts. Meaningful inclusion of Indigenous perspectives in decision-making processes is not only a moral imperative but also a practical necessity for achieving sustainable progress.
In dealing with the U.S., Canada must recognize its smaller stature and adapt accordingly. Innovative solutions that satisfy the U.S. administration, while protecting Canadian interests, are essential. This might involve creative trade arrangements or strategic economic partnerships that bolster our resilience against American economic force.
President Trump’s tariffs are a direct economic assault that requires a coordinated response. The premiers and Prime Minister Carney must set aside regional and partisan differences to address this common enemy. By meeting in the middle and pursuing shared goals, Canada can present a united front that strengthens its negotiating position.
The challenges before Canada’s leaders are significant, but not insurmountable. By fostering consensus and embracing innovative strategies, Canada can navigate the economic threats posed by the Trump administration. In doing so, the nation will not only protect its own interests but also pave the way for a more unified and resilient future.
The PM & Premiers Meet in Muskoka
My editorial cartoon in the Tuesday Hamilton Spectator:
I think one of the more likeable aspects of Mark Carney is the fact that he might just be the most non-partisan Prime Ministers we’ve seen in ages. Seriously, just take a look at what he’s wearing. Banker suits in shades so somber, you’d think he was moonlighting as a funeral director. It’s a stark contrast to the usual parade of red we’ve come to expect from Liberal leaders. Remember Pierre Trudeau’s iconic red rose, Dalton McGuinty’s red ties, or Justin Trudeau’s penchant for red socks? Carney seems to be going out of his way to avoid even a hint of crimson.
Some recent commentary even suggests he’s leading more like a Progressive Conservative than a Liberal. But despite his neutral attire and approach, the commentary boards are still buzzing with skeptics fuelled by partisan bias. It’s almost amusing how out of touch these critics seem with the popular sentiment. Polls indicate a broad satisfaction with how Carney is handling the tricky balance of dealing with Trump’s hostility while also addressing the diverse demands from Premiers, Indigenous groups, and the ever-contrarian media.
The truth is, many people watching Carney are less interested in party politics and more eager for a leader who can rise above the bickering. There’s a growing impatience with partisan squabbles, and Carney’s non-partisan demeanour seems to resonate with a public longing for unity and pragmatic leadership. It’s refreshing, and perhaps that’s why his style—both in governance and in fashion—is leaving an impression.
That said, even with a leader like Carney, who boasts an impressive CV and a wealth of experience, things can change on a dime. In politics, that’s often the reality, and in all likelihood, it will happen here too. No Prime Minister walks away from the job with the same shine they had going in. Political landscapes shift, challenges evolve, and the honeymoon period inevitably comes to an end.
For now, though, it’s so far, so good for Carney. His measured approach and non-partisan stance are resonating well, providing a refreshing change from the usual political theatre. But time will tell if he can maintain this balance and continue to steer the complex pressures of leadership without losing that lustre.
Below is the animated video showing how I created the July 22 editorial cartoon. After finishing each traditional cartoon, I put together these features using the latest technology. I want to keep things fresh and interesting, and maybe catch the eye of younger artists as inspiration to continue building on the craft. If you like what you see, I would appreciate it if you could subscribe to my SubStack. It’s free for now, at least until I might find myself among the many colleagues who have lost their jobs in the tough newspaper business. Thanks!
Why Canadians Should Choose Domestic Travel to Bolster Our Economy
July 14, 2020
As political tensions between Canada and the United States continue to rise, a unique opportunity emerges for Canadians to make impactful choices that strengthen our own economy. The decision to travel domestically instead of venturing south is more than just a response to the current geopolitical climate; it is a conscious effort to invest in our nation’s prosperity and resilience.
Mark Carney’s assertion that U.S. President Donald Trump wants to “break us, so that America can own us” underscores the urgency of this moment. In light of such rhetoric, choosing to explore Canada supports local businesses and industries that rely heavily on tourism. From the vibrant cultural scenes in Toronto and Vancouver to the breathtaking landscapes of Banff and the Maritimes, our country offers diverse and enriching experiences. By spending our travel dollars at home, we not only boost local economies but also help create jobs and sustain communities across the nation.
The current political climate is indeed heartbreaking, as the economic force wielded by one man in what he calls a trade war is affecting relationships between friends and families across the border. Family separation seems to be a recurring theme with Trump, who previously prolonged the closure of the Canada-U.S. border during COVID-19, threatening Canada’s healthcare while minimizing scientific concerns and health advice.
Domestic travel also reinforces our national identity and pride. In a time when political rhetoric challenges our sovereignty, exploring our own backyard allows us to connect with Canada’s rich history, diverse cultures, and natural beauty. It fosters a deeper appreciation for the values and landscapes that define us as Canadians.
Additionally, the economic benefits of domestic travel extend beyond the immediate tourism sector. Local spending circulates within the Canadian economy, supporting everything from hospitality and transportation to retail and entertainment. This ripple effect contributes to a more robust and self-reliant national economy, less vulnerable to external pressures.
Moreover, the current political climate has made cross-border travel less appealing. Concerns about tariffs, immigration policies, and the broader U.S.-Canada relationship have understandably deterred many Canadians from visiting the U.S. By choosing to travel within Canada, we sidestep these uncertainties and focus on building positive, supportive environments at home.
Ultimately, the choice to travel domestically is a powerful statement of self-reliance and community support. It allows Canadians to invest in our future by prioritizing local experiences and businesses. In these challenging times, let us embrace the opportunity to explore the vast and varied wonders of our own country, knowing that each journey strengthens the fabric of our nation.
Elbows Downing it to the USA?
Amid rising political tensions with the United States, Canadians are increasingly opting for domestic travel, choosing to explore their own country’s diverse landscapes and culture rather than crossing the border. This shift is driven by frustration with U.S. policies, including trade disputes and rhetoric that challenges Canadian sovereignty. By investing in local tourism, Canadians are supporting their economy, fostering national pride, and sidestepping the uncertainties of cross-border travel. Cities like Calgary are successfully attracting U.S. visitors, but the broader trend reflects a conscious effort to bolster domestic prosperity and resilience.
Why not take this chance to ditch those U.S. destinations and explore our own incredible country instead? Canada is vast, and there’s a lifetime’s worth of amazing places to see right here! I recently visited Winnipeg for the first time, and it was fantastic. Next on my list is Newfoundland, and I can’t wait to experience it.
Honestly, with the current political climate, I can’t understand why any Canadian would choose to spend their loonies in U.S. vacation spots. If you’re doing that, you might as well not come back! Sure, I get that some people have prepaid trips, but come on. Getting detained might get you some press, but it really just shows a lack of awareness—and let’s not even talk about the risk of getting into serious trouble.
I’ve got friends across the U.S. and in-laws in Ohio, but even that’s not enough to make me cross the border right now. Let’s focus on supporting our own economy and discovering the beauty that Canada has to offer. Trust me, you won’t regret it!
If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for July 19, 2025, below! Oh, these notes register hardly any traffic. Kindly click like it if you do, it’ll encourage me to post more!
Parachutes and Protest: Poilievre’s Battle in Battle River
June 27, 2025
As the summer sun casts its warm glow over Canada, the political arena seems unusually quiet, offering a much-needed respite from the roller coaster of events that marked the first half of the year. Yet, amidst this calm, one event stands out as the centrepiece of political intrigue: the by-election in the riding of Battle River-Crowfoot. It’s a spectacle that combines elements of strategy, irony, and a touch of comedy, all centred around one of the most polarizing figures in Canadian politics, Pierre Poilievre.
Poilievre’s journey to Battle River-Crowfoot is a testament to the unpredictability of political fortunes. Once on a clear path to becoming Canada’s Prime Minister, Poilievre now finds himself in a struggle to maintain relevance and leadership within his own party. His decision to run as a “parachute candidate” in this Conservative stronghold is a strategic move designed to ensure his seat in Parliament, yet it is not without its share of irony and controversy.
The Longest Ballot Committee, with its mission to flood the ballot with a record number of candidates, has added a layer of complexity to this by-election. Their actions, intended to highlight the need for electoral reform, have sparked debates about democracy and political tactics. Poilievre’s call to increase the candidacy requirements to 1,000 signatures is seen by some as a necessary step to maintain electoral integrity, while others view it as a threat to the democratic process.
It’s a classic case of political maneuvering where both sides claim the moral high ground. On one hand, we have Poilievre, a long-serving career politician, who, much like populist leaders such as Donald Trump, appears driven by ambition, sometimes at the expense of broader political realities. On the other, there are those who argue that the Longest Ballot Committee’s tactics are a legitimate form of protest, even if they complicate the electoral process.
What makes this situation particularly rich is the juxtaposition of Poilievre’s current predicament with his past. Here is a leader, once confident in his path to the highest office, now navigating the complexities of a by-election in the safest seat available, while simultaneously decrying the presence of other “parachute” candidates. It’s a scenario that seems almost theatrical in its irony.
Critics from all sides have emerged, with some questioning the need for a by-election in such a safe seat, while others decry the costs associated with an election filled with “joke candidates.” Yet, amidst these complaints, the underlying narrative remains one of political survival and adaptation.
As we watch this by-election unfold, it’s a reminder of the cyclical nature of politics. Leaders rise and fall, strategies shift, and new challenges emerge. For Poilievre, this by-election is not just a contest for a parliamentary seat but a test of his leadership and resilience. Whether he emerges strengthened or further weakened will shape the political landscape in the months to come.
In the end, the Battle River-Crowfoot by-election is more than just a local political event; it’s a window into the broader dynamics of Canadian politics, where ambition, strategy, and irony coalesce in a uniquely compelling narrative.
A Cartoonist’s Delight in the Summer Silly Season
My editorial cartoon in the Friday edition of the Hamilton Spectator: https://www.thespec.com/opinion/editorial-cartoons/parachute-candidates-perturb-poilievre/article_8b26210a-430b-5aa9-a44f-e4c5e22a2b00.html
As the summer silly season settles in, providing a much-needed breather from the political whirlwind of the first half of the year, there emerges a gem of a story that’s a veritable feast for editorial cartoonists like myself: Pierre Poilievre in the Battle River-Crowfoot by-election.
Poilievre, once a confident career politician with aspirations of becoming Canada’s Prime Minister, now finds himself in the somewhat comedic role of a parachute candidate. It’s a scene ripe with irony and satire. Picture him, metaphorically grovelling for a job, while the Longest Ballot Committee orchestrates a circus of candidates nipping at his heels. For cartoonists, this isn’t just low-hanging fruit; it’s the golden apple of the season.
The political landscape has indeed been a roller coaster, and the relative quiet is refreshing. Yet, this by-election drama shines a spotlight on Poilievre’s journey. Once steady on the path to the top, he now navigates a landscape littered with political sniping, tactical maneuvers, and the looming threat of a leadership review. Like many populist leaders, Poilievre’s ambition sometimes blinds him to the broader picture, reminiscent of Justin Trudeau’s own challenges clinging to power.
Polls suggest that the Conservative prospects aren’t improving with Poilievre at the helm, yet here we are, watching this political theatre unfold. The usual complaints about by-election costs in a safe seat and the tactic of stacking the ballot with joke candidates only add layers to this already rich narrative.
Above all, the image of Poilievre, Canada’s opposition leader, parachuting into the safest seat in the country after a national repudiation is a scene almost too good to be true. As he rails against other parachute candidates, the irony is delicious. For cartoonists, every moment of this saga is a gift, a chance to capture the absurdity and drama of a political figure navigating one of the most humiliating chapters of his career.
If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for July 18, 2025, below! Oh, these notes register hardly any traffic. Kindly click like it if you do, it’ll encourage me to post more!
In the complex and often tumultuous world of international trade, Canada’s steel industry finds itself at a precarious crossroads. With the imposition of a 50% tariff on Canadian steel and aluminum imports by U.S. President Donald Trump, challenges have arisen that require astute leadership and strategic foresight. Prime Minister Mark Carney, confronted with an unconventional U.S. administration, has embarked on a path that prioritizes resilience, diversification, and support for Canadian workers.
The crux of the issue lies in the stark imbalance of economic power between Canada and the United States. With 90% of Canada’s steel exports traditionally directed to the U.S., the impact of these tariffs cannot be underestimated. President Trump’s steadfast determination to impose tariffs on foreign steel, regardless of existing trade agreements like CUSMA, places Canada in a difficult position. In such a dynamic landscape, Carney’s approach to diversify Canada’s trade relations and reduce dependency on a single market is not just prudent—it is essential.
Diversification acts as a safeguard against the volatility of U.S. trade policies. By opening new markets and exploring opportunities beyond the immediate neighbour, Canada can reduce its vulnerability to sudden policy shifts. This strategy not only strengthens the steel sector but also aligns with broader national interests in building a more resilient and self-reliant economy.
In tandem with diversification, Carney’s commitment to supporting Canadian steel workers is a crucial component of his strategy. The allocation of $70 million for training supports and $1 billion for technological advancement within the steel industry underscores a forward-thinking approach. By investing in skills development and innovation, Canada is not merely reacting to current challenges but preparing its workforce for the future.
Moreover, the introduction of tariffs on non-free trade countries and reciprocal measures for free-trade partners reflects a balanced response to unfair competition. By reducing the influx of cheap imported steel into Canada—some of which finds its way to the U.S.—Carney addresses a significant concern of the U.S. administration. This measure could open a pathway to a more integrated North American steel market, potentially leading to reduced U.S. tariffs on Canadian products and fostering a collaborative trade environment.
Carney’s measured response, with a focus on long-term sustainability, contrasts with the unpredictability of the current U.S. administration. While President Trump’s policies may be driven by immediate gains and protectionist inclinations, Canada’s approach is rooted in a broader vision of economic stability and growth.
Navigating the challenges posed by an unconventional U.S. presidency requires careful consideration and strategic action. Prime Minister Mark Carney’s emphasis on diversification, worker support, and industry investment demonstrates a commitment to safeguarding Canada’s steel industry. This multifaceted approach not only addresses immediate concerns but also lays the groundwork for a more robust and resilient economic future. As Canada treads carefully in these uncertain times, the path forward is illuminated by a focus on innovation, inclusivity, and international collaboration.
Savvy Man of Steel
My editorial cartoon in the Thursday edition of the Hamilton Spectator: https://www.thespec.com/opinion/editorial-cartoons/mark-carney-prime-minister-of-steel/article_6f7ba0f7-71f9-5666-86bf-58a3679d87fe.html
Living in Canada’s steel capital, Trump’s 50% tariff on our steel is a real blow, impacting both businesses and everyday lives. Normally, I’d capture this in a cartoon, but a recent trip out west left me short on time.
Trump’s awkward remarks to the Liberian President highlighted his ignorance, echoing the kind of erratic and, frankly, stupid trade policies we’ve seen from him. Prime Minister Mark Carney is addressing this lunacy by diversifying our trade ties and investing in our steel workers’ skills and tech upgrades, making sure we’re not overly dependent on the U.S.
Carney’s approach to fair trade, including strategic tariffs, aims to shield Canadian interests and could lead to better cooperation in North America’s steel market. While Trump seems focused on quick wins, Carney is thinking about the long haul, emphasizing stability and growth.
In these uncertain times, innovation and collaboration are key. Here in Canada’s steel heartland, we’re ready to tackle these challenges head-on.
If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for July 17, 2025, below! Oh, these notes register hardly any traffic. Kindly click like it if you do, it’ll encourage me to post more!
In the delicate balance of preserving our planet’s natural resources, the Great Lakes stand as a vital beacon of life and sustainability. Spanning 1,200 miles from Minnesota to central New York, these lakes hold 20% of the world’s fresh surface water and provide drinking water to more than 40 million people. They support a thriving ecosystem of 3,500 species and are central to a $750 billion annual economy. Yet, under the Trump administration, these treasures are under unprecedented threat.
The recent article from The Guardian paints a sobering picture of the current administration’s disregard for environmental stewardship. Proposed budget cuts to the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other key federal agencies threaten to undermine decades of progress in protecting the Great Lakes. Moreover, the administration’s inclination to withdraw from international agreements with Canada raises alarming questions about the future of these vital waters.
The Trump administration’s rhetoric and actions reveal a troubling willingness to prioritize short-term economic gains over long-term environmental sustainability. The proposed diversion of Great Lakes water to other parts of the United States, if pursued, could have disastrous consequences for both ecological balance and international relations.
The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement and other binational treaties with Canada are more than mere formalities; they are commitments to stewardship, cooperation, and shared responsibility. They represent a promise to future generations that these waters will remain pristine and abundant.
State governments and regional organizations have admirably stepped in to fill some gaps left by federal funding cuts, but their efforts alone cannot replace the comprehensive support and enforcement capabilities of the federal government. Without a strong federal commitment, the risks of pollution, invasive species, and water-level fluctuations could escalate, threatening the very fabric of life in the region.
Silence and inaction are not options. The Great Lakes are not just a regional concern; they are a national treasure and an international responsibility. We must demand that the Trump administration uphold its obligations under international agreements and prioritize the health and sustainability of the Great Lakes.
To protect these precious waters, we need bipartisan support, increased public awareness, and unwavering advocacy. The Great Lakes are our Yellowstone, our Grand Canyon—a wonder of the world that demands our respect, care, and vigilance. It’s time to stand up for the Great Lakes and ensure that they remain a thriving legacy for generations to come.
No newsletter this week
Sorry folks, but there’ll be no cartoon review from the past week. Perhaps it’ll come next Saturday.
I’m on a Canadian-places-I’ve-never-been-to-before trip and this weekend I’m in Winnipeg, Manitoba. For Canadians like me who have spent lots of travel time and expenditure exploring the U.S. – and I’ve been to a lot of places in the U.S. in recent years from San Francisco to Phoenix and Miami, Dallas, Nashville, Chicago and Philadelphia to name a few – I’m devoting now and the next 3 and a half years to explore my own country.
Take a wild guess why.
I flew over the Great Lakes yesterday, making it the perfect opportunity to revisit the subject of the master of diversion and his water diversion scheme. Cartoon in the Hamilton Spectator: https://www.thespec.com/opinion/editorial-cartoons/trump-contemplates-ending-great-lakes-agreements/article_57fc83a0-fb2b-5d3e-bf03-38f3a08e1586.html
