Howard Lutnick – mackaycartoons

Wednesday July 15, 2026

July 15, 2026 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday July 15, 2026

The Gordie Howe Bridge Deal: A Tale of Shakedowns and Misinformation

June 11, 2026

The Gordie Howe Bridge, linking Windsor and Detroit, stands as a testament to Canada’s commitment to enhancing trade relationships. However, the recent renegotiation of its opening terms has exposed the challenges of dealing with a U.S. administration led by Donald Trump, whose tactics can best be described as a “shakedown.”

The original agreement, a creative solution balancing Canadian investment with shared prosperity, was upended by Trump’s last-minute demands. This maneuvering reflects a broader pattern of transactional politics, prioritizing perceived wins over established agreements. Such actions undermine trust and paint a concerning picture of U.S. reliability on the global stage.

News: Business leaders applaud Gordie Howe bridge opening — despite concerns over profit-sharing deal

May 12, 2026

While Canadian officials, including Prime Minister Mark Carney, worked diligently to ensure the bridge’s completion, the altered terms mean Canada will take longer to recoup its $6.4 billion investment. However, this is not a major defeat for Canada. The project ensures that toll revenues will cover operating costs and debt service, securing Canada’s financial interests in the long run.

Moreover, the bridge opens vital new trade routes, easing congestion and facilitating billions in trade. Both Ontario and Michigan stand to gain from improved logistics and economic growth. By getting the bridge open, Canadian businesses can avoid higher logistics costs, ensuring competitiveness and growth.

In this landscape, misinformation has clouded public perception. Howard Lutnick’s assertion that the original deal would lead to an influx of Chinese EVs through Canada is misleading. The bridge facilitates trade, but it doesn’t change import regulations or national trade policies. Similarly, Mike Rogers’ confusion over revenues and profits misses key distinctions. Revenues are the gross tolls collected, while profits account for operating costs and debt service. The agreement ensures Canada’s costs are covered before profit-sharing begins.

Opinion: The Gordie Howe Bridge deal isn’t simply politics as usual. It’s about Trump’s distorted vision of power

February 11, 2026

Despite these distortions, the reality remains: the bridge’s opening is crucial for trade, benefiting both Ontario and Michigan. In the end, the bridge will open, and commerce will flow, but the incident leaves a mark. It underscores the risks of engaging with an administration that wields power through coercion. As Canadians, we can take solace in the bridge’s completion and hope that Trump’s meddling is a chapter soon closed, allowing both nations to move forward collaboratively.

Thursday April 23, 2026

April 23, 2026 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday April 23, 2026

Printed in The Toronto Star.

Canada’s Trade Strategy: Patience Over Panic

February 26, 2026

In March 2025, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick compared negotiating with the United States to purchasing a Costco membership: “You have to pay before you can shop.” Yet, behind the scenes in Ottawa, it’s noted that once Costco customers pay for their membership, they aren’t asked to pull out their wallet again just to walk down the meat aisle. This transactional analogy highlights the current U.S. administration’s approach to trade, one that Canada must navigate with strategic caution.

News: Mark Carney unveils new trade advisory council as critical talks loom

Mark Carney’s initiative to establish a Canada‑U.S. trade advisory council is a commendable step forward. Bringing together a diverse group of former ministers, business leaders, and union representatives demonstrates a strategic, unified approach to navigating the complex and often turbulent trade waters with the United States. The Globe and Mail and Toronto Star rightly highlight this council’s potential to bolster domestic consensus and expertise, especially in areas like digital policy where Canada must play catch-up.

News: Washington demanding ‘entry fee’ from Ottawa before trade talks: sources

December 11, 2025

However, while the council’s foundation is strong, the road ahead is fraught with challenges. The Trump administration’s approach to trade negotiations, particularly the concept of an “entry fee” for talks, underscores a transactional mindset that diverges from traditional diplomatic norms. As CBC reports, this demand for upfront concessions, despite Canada’s previous gestures of goodwill, like shelving a digital services tax, reveals a troubling shift away from reciprocal, rules-based trade.

The involvement of figures like Howard Lutnick, coupled with the New York Times’ portrayal of Trump’s tactics as kleptocratic, raises serious concerns about the integrity and stability of any potential agreements. When trade becomes a transactional exercise focused on immediate gains rather than long-term mutual benefits, trust erodes, and the risk of unstable, asymmetrical deals increases.

NYT: Trump Holds the American People in Total Contempt

August 28, 2025

In this context, Canada’s best strategy may be to buy time. Engage in performative talks and phased negotiations, not as a form of capitulation, but as a strategic play. As seen in the stalled Iran-U.S. negotiations reported by Al Jazeera and TIME, mutual distrust can derail meaningful progress. By taking a long game approach, Canada can wait out the current political climate until post-midterm elections potentially usher in a more stable and predictable negotiating environment.

Canada must focus on transparency, enforceable commitments, and coordinated federal-provincial efforts to avoid being cornered into premature concessions. The advisory council should craft resilient strategies, including legal safeguards and diversified market approaches, to protect Canadian interests.

Ultimately, while the advisory council is a crucial tool, Canadians must temper expectations about immediate breakthroughs. Lutnick’s notion of trade as a pay-to-play scenario underscores the absurdity of current U.S. tactics, where demands for entry fees defy logic by expecting repeated payments for mere participation. By exercising patience, maintaining transparency, and avoiding hasty concessions, Canada can better position itself for a more balanced and fair engagement when the political winds shift. In the face of such transactional trade tactics, patience isn’t just a virtue, it’s a strategic necessity.

Thursday August 28, 2025

August 28, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday August 28, 2025

Also published in The Korea Times.

The Theatrics of Washington’s Political Stage

August 7, 2025

In the heart of Washington, D.C., a peculiar choreography unfolds. The National Guard, mobilized under the guise of addressing a “crime emergency” declared by President Trump, finds itself engaged in an unexpected mission of civic tidiness: picking up trash around the White House. This spectacle, ostensibly part of a “beautification and restoration mission,” raises eyebrows, particularly when crime rates in the city are at a historic low. Such displays serve less as genuine responses to crises and more as performances tailored to the whims of a president whose leadership thrives on disruption and theatrical displays of power.

Amidst this backdrop, Canadian Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc engages in what might seem like promising trade negotiations with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. On the surface, these lengthy meetings, extending beyond their scheduled time, suggest a constructive dialogue. Yet, the looming shadow of Trump’s unpredictable interventions hangs over them. The president’s penchant for abrupt policy shifts and tariff announcements has left Canada, among others, frequently on the receiving end of his transactional approach.

News: LeBlanc has ‘constructive’ meeting with U.S. counterpart as trade talks continue

July 23, 2025

Complicating matters further is Howard Lutnick himself, a prominent figure within Trump’s cabinet known for his dual nature. In person, Lutnick, like Trump, exudes a welcoming and affable demeanor, fostering a seemingly cooperative atmosphere during trade talks. However, this congeniality often evaporates once he appears on platforms like FOX News, where Lutnick becomes a vocal champion for Trump’s policies, often critiquing and even disparaging trade partners like Canada. This duality adds a layer of complexity to diplomatic efforts, as private progress can quickly be undermined by public declarations.

LeBlanc’s experience parallels the bizarre dynamics of Trump’s recent cabinet meeting, a televised marathon of sycophancy where cabinet members showered the president with praise, seemingly to satiate his insatiable ego. The spectacle, reminiscent of a reality TV episode, underscores the performative nature of governance under Trump. Cabinet sessions that should focus on substantive policy discussions transform into episodes of public adulation, with secretaries vying to outdo each other in their expressions of loyalty.

Analysis: What, Exactly, Was That Cabinet Meeting?

May 13 2025

For LeBlanc, navigating these waters requires a delicate balance. The trade talks, while ostensibly advancing, risk becoming a mere sideshow—a diplomatic dance that buys time until the next presidential decree disrupts progress. The Canadian minister must contend with the reality that beneath the veneer of progress, Trump’s proclivity for abrupt, unilateral decisions could at any moment unravel months of negotiation.

The juxtaposition of the National Guard’s unusual duties with the cabinet’s theatrical display of loyalty paints a portrait of an administration where performative politics often overshadow pragmatic governance. As LeBlanc seeks to protect Canada’s interests, he must remain vigilant, aware that amidst the pageantry, Trump’s unpredictable nature could render these efforts moot.

News: National Guard called in to deal with ‘crime emergency’ in DC are now picking up trash outside the White House

June 14, 2025

In a political landscape where appearances often eclipse substance, the challenge lies in discerning genuine progress from mere performance. For Canada and its trade representatives, this means remaining steadfast in the pursuit of stable, equitable agreements, while navigating the spectacle that is Washington under Trump—a place where the line between governance and reality TV blurs, and where the next act is always just around the corner.

Thursday August 28, 2025

In Washington, Canadian Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc faces the challenge of negotiating trade agreements with the U.S. under the theatrical and unpredictable leadership of President Trump. The backdrop features the National Guard’s unusual deployment for non-crisis tasks and a cabinet meeting characterized by public displays of loyalty. Howard Lutnick, a key cabinet member, exemplifies the dual nature of the administration, extending warmth in private talks while critiquing trade partners like Canada on public platforms. LeBlanc must discern genuine progress from performative politics to protect Canada’s interests.

Trade Charades

Watching Dominic LeBlanc maintain his composure during yet another round of trade sessions with Howard Lutnick, a well-known Trump sycophant, made me question the potential outcomes of these so-called “talks.” Whether it was before or after LeBlanc and Lutnick’s meeting, anyone who caught even a glimpse of the cabinet session, filled with grown adults lavishing praise on Donald Trump, would likely feel a twinge of secondhand embarrassment. The spectacle resembled a scene requiring more acting skill than political acumen.

The current roster of Trump’s cabinet, packed with yes men and nodding bobbleheads, seems designed to ensure compliance rather than competence. Those who dare to dissent don’t last long, as evidenced by the revolving door of secretaries during Trump’s first term. If Trump does reach the end of this term—and there’s a big “if” there—those secretaries who are smart should be plotting their exit strategy. They’ll need to find a way to rehabilitate their reputations after being closely tied to such a controversial administration. The reality of navigating this theatrical political landscape is that personal integrity might be the first casualty, but it shouldn’t be the last.

Wednesday July 23, 2025

July 23, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday July 23, 2025

Also published in The Toronto Star.

The Mischaracterization of Canada as “Mean and Nasty”

November 22, 2024

Recent remarks by Pete Hoekstra, the U.S. Ambassador to Canada, highlight a perplexing narrative. Hoekstra suggested that President Trump perceives Canadians as “mean and nasty” due to their economic responses to U.S. policies. This sentiment, however, overlooks the broader context of tensions between the two countries, largely initiated by the Trump administration.

The imposition of 50% tariffs on Canadian-made steel by the Trump administration was a unilateral move that sent shockwaves through the Canadian economy. This decision, made under the guise of national security concerns, threatened the stability of Canada’s steel industry and had far-reaching implications for car manufacturing and other sectors. Such actions do not foster a positive relationship but rather exacerbate existing tensions.

News: Trump thinks Canadians ‘nasty’ for avoiding U.S. travel, banning booze: ambassador

March 26, 2025

Compounding the issue, the Trump administration falsely justified these tariffs by claiming an emergency measure was required to combat an overblown threat of fentanyl entering the U.S. from Canada. This narrative, lacking substantial evidence, served as a hollow pretext for economic aggression, further straining diplomatic relations.

Trump’s rhetoric only added fuel to the fire. Referring to Justin Trudeau as the “governor” of Canada and suggesting that Canada could become the “51st state” were not terms of endearment but rather dismissive comments that undermined Canada’s sovereignty. Such remarks can be seen as condescending and disrespectful, contributing to a narrative of hostility rather than partnership.

In response, Canadians have exercised their power through economic choices, avoiding U.S. travel and boycotting American products like alcohol. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s statement, “We didn’t ask for this, but we will not back down,” and Mark Carney’s assertion that “Trump is trying to break us, so that America can own us,” underscore Canada’s resolve. These leaders have articulated a clear message: Canada will defend its sovereignty and economic interests in the face of external pressures.

The situation reflects a broader awakening among Canadians and other U.S. allies to the realities of their relationships with America. As Henry Kissinger once remarked, “It may be dangerous to be America’s enemy, but to be America’s friend is fatal.” This sentiment resonates today as allies reassess their reliance on the U.S. market amidst shifting geopolitical dynamics.

News: B.C. premier slams U.S. ambassador for saying Trump thinks Canadian boycotts are ‘nasty’

June 5, 2025

The frustration within the U.S. over its perceived decline has found a voice in Trump’s tough rhetoric. However, this approach risks hastening America’s own challenges, as global power dynamics shift towards nations like China. For Canada, this may mean exploring new opportunities and alliances beyond the traditional U.S. partnership.

Hoekstra’s characterization of Canada as “mean and nasty” misses the mark. The reality is that Canada is responding to actions that have threatened its economic stability and sovereignty. The Canadian public and leadership are demonstrating resilience and unity, choosing to stand firm in the face of adversity. As the global landscape evolves, Canada, like many other nations, must navigate its path with caution and foresight, untethering from a declining empire and embracing new possibilities.

Drawing the Line on Tariffs

In the ongoing spectacle of the Trump administration, the Epstein files have become the latest scandalous focus. Cartoonists are feverishly working to capture the tangled mess linking Trump to Epstein’s notorious world. Yet, as intriguing as these tales are, they often become just another part of the endless cycle of controversies.

For Canadians, however, the pressing issue isn’t the scandalous gossip—it’s the economic impact of Trump’s tariffs. Drawing inspiration from the infamous “Blame Canada” song from South Park, we shift focus to what truly affects us: the loonie tariffs imposed on our industries. While scandals may divert attention, the real strain is felt in our economy.

Picture a South Park-style scene with Pete Hoekstra, Donald Trump, and Howard Lutnick singing a parody of “Blame Canada”. A pie chart reveals the real border issues, while a bewildered beaver represents the tariff troubles. Hoekstra blames Canada, Trump labels us “mean and nasty,” and Lutnick joins in—all while the real issues linger.

While many are getting lost in scandalous distractions, that let’s face it, won’t go anywhere, others are focusing on defending our industries and standing up for Canada. Because while scandals may make headlines, it’s the tariffs that hit us hardest. And if our efforts are causing a stir, then we’re on the right track.

Please enjoy the making-of video of my July 23, 2025 editorial cartoon.

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Wednesday March 14, 2018

March 13, 2018 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday March 14, 2018

Rex Tillerson just got brutally dumped from the White House

January 17, 2018

For the last several months, there have been rumors that President Trump was displeased with his Secretary of State and that he wanted to replace him with CIA Director Mike Pompeo. The White House has repeatedly denied that such a shakeup was in the offing, and Tillerson has repeatedly said that he doesn’t want to leave his job. But on Tuesday morning, Trump tweeted it out.

There is a lot going on here. Tillerson and Trump have never exactly jibed. The two have clashed over the Paris Climate Accords, North Korea, and the decision to move the United States’s embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Most recently, Tillerson raised eyebrows by laying the blame on Russia for the poisoning of the double agent Sergei Skripal—something that Sarah Huckabee Sanders wouldn’t do.

August 12, 2017

All of that may be secondary to the fact that Trump has never quite gotten over being called a “fucking moron” by his secretary of state. Tillerson was caught unawares, with the State Department saying he “had every intention of staying. … The Secretary did not speak to the President and is unaware of the reason.”

Tillerson’s tenure was a disaster, marked by a historic gutting of his department, conflicts with the president that increasingly left him outside of major policy decisions, and a seeming hatred for the job. But perhaps Tillerson’s main problem was that he tried to act like a diplomat in an administration that hates diplomacy.

For those who are concerned about Trump’s erratic temperament, Pompeo and Haspel are alarming choices. Pompeo sees the War on Terror as a clash of civilizations and is a hawk when it comes to Iran. Haspel, meanwhile, played a “direct role” in the CIA’s extraordinary rendition program. With weeks to go before negotiations with North Korea supposedly start, Trump’s national security team just got a lot more hawkish. (Source: New Republic)

UPDATE: Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay – Wednesday March 26, 2025

March 26, 2025

Trump’s cabinet is characterized by loyalty-driven appointments, where fealty often overshadows expertise, raising concerns about governance integrity.

The Dynamics of Loyalty and Flattery in Trump’s Cabinet

In the political landscape shaped by Donald Trump, the dynamics of loyalty and sycophancy have played a defining role in his administration’s composition and functioning. Trump’s cabinet has been noted for its members’ pronounced loyalty and willingness to echo his policies and rhetoric, often prioritizing allegiance over expertise.

Many of Trump’s appointees and advisors were handpicked not only for their qualifications but also for their unwavering support and public praise of his leadership style. This environment fostered a culture where flattery and alignment with Trump’s views were seen as essential for maintaining favor and position within the administration.

Critics have argued that this dynamic led to a lack of critical debate and dissent, with cabinet meetings often resembling orchestrated sessions of praise. Notable instances include early cabinet meetings where members took turns lauding Trump’s accomplishments and leadership. This ritualized flattery mirrored gatherings hosted by Trump’s former lawyer, Roy Cohn, though with a more obligatory tone.

The emphasis on loyalty over expertise also contributed to frequent turnover within the cabinet. Those who failed to demonstrate sufficient allegiance or who challenged Trump’s views often found themselves replaced. This approach has raised concerns about the implications for governance and policy, with critics from both sides of the political spectrum expressing alarm over the potential erosion of institutional integrity.

As Trump continues to influence American politics, the legacy of his cabinet’s dynamics offers a cautionary tale about the balance between loyalty and independent counsel in the corridors of power.

For further insights, you can explore sources such as The New York Times, Washington Post, and Politico, which have extensively covered these aspects of Trump’s administration.

This cartoon has been re-purposed from a version that was originally published March 14, 2018