MacKay - Canadian Editorial Cartoons
mackaycartoons

Graeme MacKay's Editorial Cartoon Archive

  • Who?
  • Copyright
  • Boutique
  • Kings & Queens
  • Prime Ministers
  • Presidents
  • The French Monarchy Project
  • DOWNLOADS

values

Thursday March 5, 2026

March 5, 2026 by Graeme MacKay

Mark Carney straddles alliances and values amidst the U.S. attack on Iran.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday March 5, 2026

Canada’s Balancing Act: Principles vs. Realpolitik

The U.S.-Israeli operation in Iran raises legal and ethical concerns, driven by political motives rather than imminent threats.

March 3, 2026

The recent U.S./Israeli-led attack on Iran, resulting in the removal of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his inner circle, presents a complex geopolitical landscape that Canada must navigate with both caution and foresight. While the elimination of a repressive regime head might initially be seen as a step towards justice, the lack of congressional endorsement and international support raises serious concerns about the future stability of Iran and the broader Middle East region.

News: Mark Carney backs U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran despite his doubts over their legality

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s leadership embodies the nuanced balancing act required in such a tumultuous environment. His approach, often characterized as pragmatic, reflects the “Carney Doctrine” articulated in his recent Davos speech. This doctrine emphasizes the need for middle powers like Canada to adapt to shifting global dynamics while maintaining core principles. Carney’s support for the U.S.-Israeli actions, despite legal and ethical dilemmas, underscores the delicate dance between realpolitik and adherence to Canadian values.

The Gordie Howe International Bridge becomes a battleground for U.S.-Canada relations, with Trump's demands met by Carney's diplomatic finesse.

February 11, 2026

In this context, Carney’s strategy resonates with many Canadians who recognize the necessity of maintaining strong alliances while advocating for a principled foreign policy. The absence of a clear endgame from the Trump administration, coupled with a dismissive stance on reconstruction responsibilities, only complicates Canada’s position further. It underscores the need for a measured response that safeguards Canada’s interests without compromising its integrity.

In simpler terms, the sentiments expressed by Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew provide a grounding perspective. Kinew’s call for peace amid escalating tensions highlights the human impact of geopolitical decisions. His message, delivered poignantly during a community iftar, reflects a universal desire for stability and safety, particularly for families with ties to the region.

News: Kinew calls for peace amid unrest in Iran, Middle East

Alberta's separatist stirrings spark calls for clarity as Premier Smith faces pressure to denounce U.S. annexation talks.

January 30, 2026

Kinew’s emphasis on peace aligns with the broader Canadian public’s values, providing a counterbalance to the complex strategic maneuvers on the global stage. His focus on the well-being of children and families serves as a reminder that, amidst political calculations, the fundamental pursuit of peace should remain paramount.

As Canada navigates this challenging terrain, it must continue to balance its historical commitment to peacekeeping with the realities of contemporary geopolitics. Carney’s leadership, complemented by voices like Kinew’s, offers a path forward that seeks to harmonize principles with practicalities, ensuring that Canada remains a beacon of stability and integrity in an uncertain world.

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2026-08, alliances, attack, Canada, Donald Trump, Iran, Israel, lady justice Mark Carney, peace, principles, realpolitik, rules based order, stability, U.S., values, war

Saturday, November 8 2025

November 8, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Mark Carney positions himself as a Progressive Conservative, filling a political void in Canada with a strategy to maintain voter support and power.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday, November 8 2025

Carney’s Progressive Conservative Play: Filling Canada’s Political Void

Mark Carney's 2025 budget navigates economic pressures, political constraints, and geopolitical challenges, while a Conservative defection hints at deeper party fractures.

November 6, 2025

In recent months, Mark Carney’s leadership has sparked a significant shift in Canada’s political landscape, one that resonates with a growing segment of the electorate seeking balanced governance. His approach, seen in both his policy decisions and the latest budget, reflects a strategic alignment that attracts a broader voter base—those who favor economic conservatism while remaining cautious of traditional Conservative leadership under Pierre Poilievre.

Carney’s strategy is not just a political maneuver; it is a reflection of a pragmatic response to the evolving needs of Canadians. By integrating fiscal responsibility with moderate social policies, Carney is effectively bridging the gap between progressive ideals and conservative economic principles. This has created a new centrist path that appeals to voters who are disillusioned with the polarized political environment.

Opinion: Mark Carney, and the return of the progressive conservative  

At the pivotal NATO summit, Canada faces the challenge of increasing defence spending to meet new alliance targets while balancing national priorities and international commitments.

June 25, 2025

The recent budget underscores this shift, emphasizing investment in economic growth, prudent fiscal management, and a significant boost to defence spending without raising taxes. Such measures are reminiscent of the Progressive Conservative ethos, which values economic stewardship and strategic public investment. Carney’s policies have attracted not only centrist voters but also some members of Poilievre’s Conservative caucus, who have started to defect in search of a more balanced political home.

Canada finds itself in a unique situation, navigating the twin challenges of economic forces imposed by a hostile Donald Trump and the broader unfavourable global trade conditions. With tariffs and protectionist stances affecting traditional trade dynamics, Carney is undertaking plans to diversify Canada’s trade relationships, reducing reliance on the U.S. and reaching out to global markets. This strategic pivot seeks to secure economic resilience amid geopolitical tensions.

Analysis: Mark Carney has turned the Titanic. He needs to keep turning  

The proposed changes to capital gains taxation and a change in election timing which stands to endow more that 80 MPs Parliamentary pensions, reveals a troubling pattern of government prioritizing political interests over the financial struggles of middle-income taxpayers, highlighting a pervasive culture of double speak and self-serving governance.

April 30, 2024

Amid these challenges, Canada also faces a cost of living crisis, putting pressure on households nationwide. Carney understands he cannot simply turn to taxpayers to fill budgetary gaps, nor can he afford to slash the public sector too deeply without risking further economic strain. The public sector plays a crucial role in maintaining economic stability, and drastic cuts could exacerbate the crisis by reducing consumer spending and increasing unemployment.

At the same time, Carney recognizes the need to bolster Canada’s military capabilities in an increasingly dangerous world. With aggressive posturing from leaders like Russia’s Vladimir Putin and ongoing uncertainties with Trump, the commitment to enhance defence spending is crucial. While this has come at the expense of some climate change initiatives, it reflects a necessary prioritization of national security in the current global climate.

As Canadian political parties promise tax cuts without detailing spending cuts, voters face uncertainty about potential austerity measures post-election.

April 22, 2025

Carney’s ability to attract a diverse voter base is further evidenced by his commitment to cutting bureaucratic inefficiencies, streamlining regulatory processes, and focusing on infrastructure and housing projects. These initiatives resonate with Canadians who believe in the power of government to facilitate growth while appreciating the importance of a lean, effective public sector.

The political defections and shifting allegiances highlight a broader sentiment: Canadians are ready for a change from the divisive rhetoric and are looking for leadership that offers a clear, positive vision for the future. This is where Carney excels, providing a roadmap that combines the best of economic conservatism with a progressive social conscience.

The Liberal Party's leadership race to succeed Trudeau faces internal chaos and external pressures from U.S. tariffs, with candidates like Carney, Freeland, and Gould competing to address these challenges.

January 16, 2025

Mark Carney’s strategy is not just a recalibration of the Liberal Party; it represents a necessary evolution in Canadian politics. By navigating the complex web of global challenges and attracting those wary of Poilievre’s conservative approach, Carney is not only redefining his party but also setting a new standard for governance—one that prioritizes unity, growth, and security. This is a vision that resonates with many Canadians, positioning Carney as a transformative leader capable of guiding Canada toward a prosperous and secure future, all while managing the delicate balance of economic pressures at home.


Carney the Progressive Conservative

How boring are we Canadians? We’re so boring that a federal budget release this week is on par with last week’s up and down drama of the Blue Jays in the World Series! And yes, I’m that boring too. Instead of indulging in thrilling news, I’ve spent the week crafting editorial cartoons on just one subject: the federal budget. The grand finale of these cartoons? My take on the week’s winner: Mark Carney.

The week kicked off with the budget’s unveiling, sparking analysis, praise, and criticism from all sides. It became a hotbed of drama, featuring two attempts by the opposition to topple the government, resulting in a defection and a political retirement from the Conservative caucus. Amidst all this, Carney’s strategy emerged as the victor, charting a clear fiscal course for Canada.

Mark Carney is a Liberal in name only; he’s arguably the most Progressive Conservative Prime Minister since the days of Mulroney and Campbell in the early ’90s. It seems to be the winning strategy, at least for now. I’ve become that old pundit I used to hear in my 20s comparing Mulroney to Diefenbaker. Wow, I’m really getting old!

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2025-20, balance, Canada, circus, Conservative, Defence, fiscal, leadership, Mark Carney, Pierre Poilievre, Progressive, tent, Trade, values

Thursday, October 23 2025

October 23, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Trump's architectural ambitions and Putin's geopolitical maneuvers highlight the tension between legacy-building and the erosion of American values.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday, October 23 2025

Legacy in Stone, Values in Peril: The Dual Heist

August 22, 2025

In recent weeks, two narratives have emerged, echoing through the historic streets of Paris and the hallowed halls of Washington, D.C. On one hand, President Trump envisions a triumphal arch akin to the Arc de Triomphe, symbolizing his self-fashioned legacy reminiscent of a modern-day Napoleon. On the other, a brazen heist at the Louvre Museum, where thieves absconded with Napoleonic jewels, serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of legacy and the audacity of those willing to seize it.

News: Louvre heist losses put at almost €90m as museum’s head prepares to face senators

Trump’s architectural dreams echo Napoleon’s transformative touch on Paris, where the French leader left an indelible mark through grand monuments and urban redesign. Similarly, Trump’s plans for a triumphal arch and a $200 million ballroom addition to the White House serve not just as celebrations of America’s 250th anniversary but as testaments to his own influence. These projects are more than mere symbols; they involve the literal dismantling of history, as seen in the renovation of the White House’s East Wing, making way for construction cranes that loom large both physically and metaphorically.

News: Architects Urged a Review of Trump’s Ballroom. Cue the Demolition Crew

The Alaska summit between Trump and Putin risks being a performative exercise prioritizing personal ambitions over genuine peace efforts for Ukraine.

August 15, 2025

These cranes, reminiscent of those used in the Louvre heist, symbolize more than construction—they represent the machinery of distraction. As Trump focuses on his legacy, Vladimir Putin continues his aggressive land grabs in Ukraine, symbolically robbing America of its once-vaunted “American Exceptionalism.” The postponed Trump-Putin meetings underscore a diplomatic dance where the U.S. seems to lose its footing on the global stage, much like the stolen jewels slipping from their cases.

News: What to Know About Trump’s Plan for a Triumphal Arch in Washington

The Louvre heist, with its dramatic theft facilitated by construction equipment, parallels the subtle heist of American values. Just as Parisian authorities grapple with the loss of prized artifacts, America faces the erosion of its moral and political leadership. The jewels of democracy, freedom, and global influence are at risk as focus shifts from international engagement to inward-looking projects.

Canada commits $9 billion to defence spending to address global threats and align with NATO expectations, while balancing national interests.

June 10 2025 

Trump’s architectural pursuits might offer a physical legacy, but they risk overshadowing the intangible legacy of leadership and diplomacy. The parallels with Napoleon are striking, yet history reminds us that monuments alone do not define greatness. They are but stone and metal, vulnerable to the passage of time and the whims of those who seek to claim them.

News: Trump says he did not want ‘wasted meeting’ after plan for Putin talks shelved

In this dual narrative, the challenge lies not in the grandeur of arches or the allure of jewels, but in reclaiming a vision of America that stands unassailable on the global stage. As we watch construction cranes rise and diplomatic talks stall, it’s worth considering what legacy we truly wish to leave behind. Will it be one of monumental structures or of restored ideals, of reclaimed leadership in a world increasingly defined by new conquerors and silent heists?


The French Connection

Whenever I travel, I love taking photos of famous buildings. My recent trip to France was no different. I had no idea that soon after, these places would be in the news. We’ve seen a major heist at the Louvre and heard about Trump’s plan to build an arch like Napoleon’s. Trump, who often boasts about ending wars quickly, seems to think he needs a big monument to mark his legacy, much like Napoleon did. Now, he’s set on changing Washington, D.C., starting by tearing down part of the White House for a new ballroom.

During my visit, I explored the Arc de Triomphe and the Louvre’s Apollon Hall, where the French crown jewels are displayed. The hall’s design impressed me more than the jewels. I took a picture of a crown, but the area was crowded with people taking Instagram photos, so I kept my distance. My cartoon work often combines different stories to create new insights. France has been a big focus lately. I even thought about including former President Sarkozy, who just started a prison sentence, to draw a parallel with where Trump might belong. But that idea didn’t quite fit.

More on this in my weekly review of editorial cartoons in my Saturday Newsletter, The Graeme Gallery.

 

Posted in: International Tagged: 2025-19, Arc de Triomphe, architecture, construction, cranes, diplomacy, Donald Trump, exceptionalism, heist, legacy, Louvre, monuments, Napoleon, Ukraine, values, Vladimir Putin, White House

Monday April 28, 2025

April 28, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

The 2025 papal conclave is poised to shape the future of the Catholic Church, balancing tradition and modernity as diverse global leaders vie for the papacy.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay – Monday April 28, 2025

Conclave 2025: A Crossroads of Tradition and Change

As the Catholic Church gears up for the 2025 papal conclave, the stakes are exceptionally high. This election follows the passing of Pope Francis, a pontiff renowned for his progressive stance on numerous issues and his efforts to globalize the College of Cardinals. The conclave, set to begin on May 7th in the Sistine Chapel, will see 135 cardinal electors participating from 71 countries, reflecting the international diversity championed by Pope Francis.

The conclave will determine whether to continue on the progressive path set by Pope Francis or pivot towards more conservative leadership. This decision will profoundly impact the Church’s stance on critical issues like climate change, social justice, and interfaith dialogue. With a significant number of non-European cardinals, there’s a strong possibility of electing a pope from the Global South, further emphasizing the Church’s worldwide reach and influence. The new pope will need to balance upholding traditional Catholic values with addressing modern challenges, such as declining membership in certain regions and the need for reform within the Church’s bureaucracy.

Analysis: The ‘Papabiles’: Six men who could become the next pope following the papal conclave

Among the leading candidates, Cardinal Pietro Parolin of Italy stands out as a seasoned diplomat and traditional choice, appealing to those seeking stability. Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle from the Philippines is known for his progressive leanings, emphasizing inclusivity and social justice, which resonates with younger, more diverse segments of the Church. Cardinal Peter Turkson from Ghana is another strong contender, with his leadership in addressing global issues and his African heritage reflecting the Church’s commitment to diversity. Cardinal Péter Erdő of Hungary is recognized for his conservative theological views, appealing to those who wish to reinforce traditional Catholic doctrines.

The outcome of the conclave is unpredictable, and both media and betting markets are closely watching the proceedings. With security measures in place to ensure the conclave’s integrity, the gravity of this decision for the Church’s future cannot be understated. For further insights into the dynamics of the conclave and potential leaders who could shape the future of the Catholic Church, readers can explore detailed articles on Vatican Conclave 2025 expectations, potential candidates for the next pope, and the stakes of the 2025 papal election.

This editorial cartoon was first published March 7, 2013

Posted in: Uncategorized Tagged: 2025-09, cardinals, challenges, conclave, Conservative, diversity, Electors, Francis, future, Global, leadership, Modernity, Papacy, Progressive, roman Catholic, tradition, values

Thursday March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Trump's Court: The New Era of American Monarchy

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday March 6, 2025

“America is Back” – A Return to What?

The inauguration of Donald Trump in the Capitol Rotunda, a site of past chaos, highlights the deepening divides and fears surrounding his administration while Biden's preemptive pardons attempt to shield his adversaries from potential retribution against a backdrop of oligarchic influence.

January 21, 2025

The declaration of “America is back” by President Donald Trump rings through the halls of power with a resonance that’s both reassuring to some and disconcerting to others. But as we delve deeper into his policies and the current state of the nation, a pressing question arises: Back to what, precisely? The rhetoric suggests a return to greatness, yet the reality paints a picture that seems to harken back to an era less democratic and more autocratic.

Trump’s imposition of tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China has been described by The Economist as an unexpected upheaval, causing a ripple of economic isolationism reminiscent of the protectionist policies of the late 19th century. Readers of The Globe and Mail express concern that these actions dismantle decades of progress toward free trade that the U.S. once championed. The United States, a founding figure in reducing global trade barriers through agreements like GATT and the WTO, now appears to be retreating to a time when tariffs were the norm rather than the exception.

News: A Combative Trump Says ‘America Is Back’ and Taunts His Political Rivals

Donald Trump’s second-term rhetoric and policies signal a shift from isolationism to economic and territorial expansionism, challenging global stability and international norms.

February 7, 2025

The editorial from The Globe and Mail paints a picture of a U.S. pivoting away from its Western allies towards the arms of the Kremlin. This shift raises questions about America’s role as a reliable ally in the post-war era, a period when it provided security and leadership against totalitarianism. Reader comments reflect unease over the abandonment of long-held security guarantees and the potential fallout for global stability. The U.S. seems to be distancing itself from the very alliances it helped to build, suggesting a return to an era of isolationism and unilateralism.

Domestically, Trump’s administration is characterized by significant upheaval, with an unelected billionaire like Elon Musk reportedly wielding power to fire civil servants. The concentration of power in the hands of a few individuals and the erosion of institutional norms evoke a time before the robust checks and balances established by the founding fathers. Reader comments express fears of a permanent alteration in governance, with democracy itself appearing to be under threat.

The escalating Canada-U.S. trade tensions, driven by President Trump's tariffs, have united Canadians across political lines and spurred retaliatory actions, while opening discussions on diversifying trade partnerships.

February 4, 2025

Trump’s rhetoric of annexing territories and embracing former adversaries echoes imperial expansionism. The notion of America “being back” might conjure images of a time when nations were led by divine kings, wielding unchecked power and pursuing imperial ambitions. This raises the question of whether Trump’s vision aligns with the democratic ideals and international cooperation that have long defined American leadership.

Opinion: Pax Americana is over. Donald Trump killed it

As Trump declares “America is back,” the question remains: Back to what historical period does he refer? Is it a return to economic isolationism, diplomatic withdrawal, and centralized power reminiscent of monarchies? For a nation that once stood as a beacon of democracy and global leadership, the current trajectory seems at odds with the principles that have guided it for over two centuries.

February 6, 2019

In this context, the call for vigilance and reflection becomes imperative. Understanding what “America is back” truly means is crucial for the nation and the world, as the implications of this rhetoric reverberate across borders and generations. The path forward must reconcile the nation’s historical ideals with the challenges and complexities of the modern world.


America is back (To c1534)

Just wrapped up another day at the drawing board, capturing the political scene. If you know my work, you’ll recall my detailed chart of English and British monarchs. In the Trump 2.0 era, though he’s been in power just six weeks, I’ve already illustrated him in royal attire a few times.

U.S. history has seen presidents compared to overbearing kings when they veer from the essence of a presidency, rooted in the republic’s founding ideals. Yet here we are with Donald Trump, the “anti-President,” echoing the Vatican’s anti-popes and Oliver Cromwell’s flirtation with kingship. Trump, who seems to relish the company of monarchs and dictators, has expressed his kingly aspirations openly.

What’s more, his followers are urging him to break term limits and push for a third term, a notion that challenges the legitimacy of democratic elections. It’s as if Trump and his circle of enablers have forgotten that a U.S. President isn’t meant to play king. With MAGA’s fealty and his grand rhetoric about territories, when Trump says “America is Back,” it feels like a nod to Tudor times

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for March 6, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Posted in: USA Tagged: 2025-05, Congress, Democracy, Doge, Donald Trump, Elon Musk, influence, J.D. Vance, Kash Patel, King, leadership, liberty, Mike Johnson, Monarchy, oligarchy, Pam Bondi, Pete Hesgeth, power, RFK jr., Substack, transformation, USA, values, wealth
1 2 3 Next »
...Check it out and please subscribe!

Your one-stop-MacKay-shop…

T-shirts, hoodies, clocks, duvet covers, mugs, stickers, notebooks, smart phone cases and scarfs

2023 Coronation Design
Follow Graeme's board My Own Cartoon Favourites on Pinterest.

MacKay’s Virtual Gallery

Copyright © 2016 mackaycartoons.net

Powered by Wordpess and Alpha.

DMCA.com Protection Status
Loading Comments...