2025-08 – Page 2 – mackaycartoons

Saturday April 19, 2025

April 19, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday April 19, 2025

Poilievre’s Notwithstanding Gamble: A Risky Precedent for Canada

May 4, 2024

In a political landscape increasingly characterized by divisive rhetoric and the erosion of democratic norms, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s pledge to invoke the notwithstanding clause of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a troubling signal. His proposal to use this powerful constitutional tool to impose consecutive life sentences for multiple murderers may tap into populist sentiments, but it sets a dangerous precedent that should disqualify him and his party from gaining the reins of power.

December 14, 2022

The notwithstanding clause, or Section 33 of the Charter, allows federal and provincial governments to override certain Charter rights temporarily. Traditionally, its use has been confined to provincial matters, such as Quebec’s secularism laws, where it has already sparked controversy. No Canadian Prime Minister has ever used this clause at the federal level, and for good reason. It represents an extraordinary measure intended for exceptional circumstances, not a tool for advancing populist agendas.

December 6, 2022

Poilievre’s willingness to be the first Prime Minister to wield this clause reflects a concerning alignment with tactics seen south of the border under Donald Trump. Trump’s efforts to undermine the judiciary and politicize the courts have led to a weakening of the checks and balances that are foundational to American democracy. Canadians should be wary of similar trends taking root here.

News: Poilievre’s pledge to use notwithstanding clause a ‘dangerous sign’: legal expert

Critics, including legal experts and political leaders, have voiced strong opposition to Poilievre’s plan. They warn that normalizing the use of the notwithstanding clause for routine legislative purposes could erode the Charter’s protections and lead to further politicization of fundamental rights. This slippery slope could extend beyond criminal justice, potentially threatening academic freedom, reproductive rights, and other areas where individual liberties might clash with political agendas.

March 15, 2025

Public sentiment, as reflected in reader comments and broader discourse, reveals deep apprehension about Poilievre’s intentions. The use of the notwithstanding clause is seen not only as an overreach but also as an indication of Poilievre’s authoritarian tendencies—a “trumpy” approach that prioritizes personal opinion over established legal norms. Such a path risks alienating those who value the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary.

News: Poilievre says he’ll use notwithstanding clause to ensure multiple-murderers die in prison

November 9 2024

Poilievre’s tough-on-crime rhetoric may resonate with certain voter bases, but the implications of his proposals extend far beyond immediate policy goals. They strike at the heart of Canada’s democratic values and the delicate balance of power that protects citizens’ rights. As we approach the upcoming election, it is crucial for Canadians to consider the long-term consequences of granting power to a leader willing to circumvent the Charter for political gain.

In a time when global democratic institutions face unprecedented challenges, Canada must stand firm in upholding its principles. Poilievre’s promise to invoke the notwithstanding clause is a stark reminder of the stakes at play. It is a promise that, if fulfilled, could fundamentally alter the landscape of Canadian governance. For this reason, it stands as yet another compelling argument.

“Notwithstanding Clause” no doubt instantly triggers eye glazing in vast swaths of Canadians, a nation where many voters remain unaware of its implications until they feel the impact firsthand. Pierre Poilievre, echoing Trump, is using populist outrage to justify potentially overriding judicial independence with the notwithstanding clause, signalling a troubling shift towards authoritarianism. What might have been seen as fear-mongering before an election becomes irrelevant once a movement takes power. When these accusations no longer trigger instinctive reactions, they solidify into harsh realities. Just look south for proof of this. Timbit Trump’s promise to enforce life sentences by bypassing court decisions raises concerns about future threats to constitutional rights, drawing unsettling parallels with recent U.S. politics. Today, Poilievre targets criminal sentencing, but despite denying admiration for Trump, he emulates many strategies from the Trump playbook, suggesting he might next challenge academic freedom, women’s rights, or other constitutional protections. This commitment to undermining judicial independence to consolidate power is the pivotal issue of this election, as it echoes the U.S. pattern of filling the judiciary with like-minded judges and defying court rulings, reflecting a desire to centralize authority. Sure, just what democracy ordered: another leader eager to override court decisions with his own, thanks to the trusty notwithstanding clause. Vote for this at your peril.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 19, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

YouTube: Easter Bunny Rejection https://youtu.be/jDyQEaocYGc

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Friday April 18, 2025

April 18, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, Unpublished – Friday April 18, 2025

A Disservice to Canadian Voters

April 19, 2025

In the throes of an election cycle, Canadian voters find themselves navigating a landscape devoid of fully costed party platforms. As advanced polls open, the absence of detailed fiscal plans from major political players like the Liberals and Conservatives is not just a minor oversight; it’s a reckless disregard for the electorate’s right to informed decision-making.

Party platforms serve as a blueprint for governance, offering insight into priorities and fiscal strategies. They are essential for holding future governments accountable. Yet, here we are, mere weeks from casting ballots, and the fiscal blueprints remain elusive. The Conservatives have pledged to collaborate with the Parliamentary Budget Officer, while the Liberals promise a release before the advanced polls close. However, these assurances come too late in the game, leaving voters with little time to digest and debate the implications of proposed policies.

Opinion: Where are the Costed Party Platforms? The Clock is Ticking

The recklessness of this approach is underscored by the current economic climate. With Canada facing a third major economic shock in less than two decades—following the 2008 financial crisis, the 2020 pandemic, and now the 2025 US trade conflict—the need for transparent and credible fiscal planning is paramount. Proposals to cut taxes or increase spending should be weighed against the backdrop of economic uncertainty and potential deficits. The lack of detailed platforms raises questions about how these promises will be funded and whether they are fiscally responsible.

Despite this, the reality may be that the absence of costed platforms doesn’t significantly sway most voters. In an age where political campaigns often resemble theatrical performances, filled with grand promises and vague assurances, the specifics of fiscal policy may take a backseat to broader ideological alignments and emotional appeals. Many voters prioritize immediate concerns over long-term fiscal sustainability, trusting party rhetoric over detailed economic assessments.

Opinion: The hidden costs of Liberal and Conservative election promises

However, this complacency is a gamble. Without clear plans, voters are left to speculate on the sincerity and feasibility of campaign promises. It allows parties to make grandiose claims without accountability for their financial implications, potentially leading to governance that prioritizes short-term gains over sustainable economic health.

While the absence of costed platforms may not deter most voters, it represents a significant dereliction of political responsibility. It denies Canadians the opportunity to engage in meaningful debate about the future direction of the country. As citizens, we must demand more from our political leaders, insisting on transparency and accountability in their fiscal promises. The stakes are too high to accept anything less.

Thursday April 17, 2025

April 17, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday April 17, 2025

The Shadow of Trump in Canada’s Leaders’ Debate

March 21, 2025

As the leaders of Canada’s major political parties prepare to take the stage for tonight’s crucial debate, the spectre of Donald Trump’s influence looms large. While domestic issues such as affordability, healthcare, and housing remain critical to Canadians, it is the external pressure from an increasingly autocratic U.S. president that has captured the national focus. Trump’s imposition of tariffs and withdrawal from multilateral agreements has not only strained Canada’s economy but also reshaped the global political landscape, leaving Canada in a precarious position.

The recent comments by White House Press Briefing Room spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt, reiterating Trump’s desire to annex Canada as the 51st state, have only added fuel to the fire. What might seem like bluster or a strategic distraction has tangible effects on Canadian society and politics. This rhetoric, highlighted by Susan Delacourt’s column, underscores Trump’s metaphorical presence in the Canadian election, influencing both policy and public perception.

Opinion: The other leader at this week’s federal election debates: Donald Trump

February 22, 2025

The implications of Trump’s policies and rhetoric are far-reaching. Canadians are increasingly cashing out their U.S. vacation homes, driven by fears of economic penalties and a sense of unwelcome. As reported by the Wall Street Journal, the political uncertainty has altered shopping patterns and investment decisions, with many Canadians reconsidering their ties to the U.S. This shift is not merely economic but deeply personal, as Canadians grapple with the erosion of goodwill and trust with their southern neighbour.

Video: Trump believes Canadians would ‘benefit greatly’ from becoming 51st state, White House rep reiterates

February 20, 2025

Tonight’s debate offers a platform for leaders like Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre to articulate their visions for addressing this complex relationship. Carney’s economic expertise and diplomatic finesse will be tested as he seeks to reassure Canadians of their sovereignty and stability. Poilievre, known for his aggressive stance, will need to demonstrate his capability to handle Trump’s unpredictability while advocating for Canada’s interests.

The stakes are high. Trump’s rhetoric and actions have inserted themselves into the very fabric of Canadian politics, creating a sense of urgency and existential threat. The leaders must confront not only the immediate economic impacts but also the broader implications for Canada’s identity and autonomy.

Analysis: Canadians Are Cashing Out Their American Vacation Homes

September 9, 2021

As Canadians tune in to the debate, they will be looking for leaders who can stand firm against external pressures while fostering a resilient and prosperous nation. Tonight’s discussion will be pivotal in shaping the narrative of Canada’s future, amid the challenges posed by a shifting global order and a neighbour whose policies and rhetoric demand serious consideration. The time for decisive leadership is now, and Canadians will be watching closely to see who can rise to the occasion.

Karoline Leavitt steps into the spotlight from a podium marked “The White House, Washington,” boldly proclaiming, “The President maintains his position that Canadians would benefit greatly by becoming the 51st state.” As Canadian leaders Mark Carney, Jagmeet Singh, Yves-Francois Blanchet, and Pierre Poilievre exchange worried glances, the scene becomes a satirical jab at U.S. influence on Canadian politics. With Trump’s policies already creating economic ripples and Leavitt’s reputation for stirring controversy, the debate feels more like a theatrical performance. Her knack for mixing up pronouns, historical events, and even dinosaurs adds a layer of comedic absurdity, leaving everyone wondering if the true spectacle is the debate or the delightful chaos of her statements.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 17, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

April 17, 2025 | Trump in the Debate https://youtu.be/7YzWH2iEwYY

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Wednesday April 16, 2025

April 16, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday April 16, 2025

Ontario’s Balancing Act and Tariffs and Turmoil

March 26, 2025

Ontario’s government has delivered the Speech from the Throne, marking a pivotal moment in the province’s journey through complex domestic and international challenges. Premier Doug Ford’s administration has laid out its agenda, highlighting efforts to counter U.S. tariffs and address pressing internal issues.

In the speech, the government pledged to remove barriers to interprovincial trade and expedite approvals for new mines in the Northern Ring of Fire region, emphasizing its strategic importance to Ontario’s economy and security. This move reflects a commitment to economic resilience and a response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s trade policies, underscoring that “Canada will never be the 51st state.”

The Throne Speech also reaffirmed Ontario’s dedication to the electric vehicle and battery industry, securing significant investments and maintaining a leadership role in North America. Despite critiques of substantial subsidies from Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, the province remains committed to supporting this vital sector.

News: Trump and Ontario’s tariff response likely to dominate Ford’s throne speech

March 12, 2025

Domestically, the speech addressed the need for immediate action in healthcare, housing, and social services. Ford’s administration recognizes the urgency of reducing wait times, improving housing affordability, and tackling social issues such as homelessness, poverty, mental health, and drug addiction.

The ambitious infrastructure plan, including a new tunnel expressway under Highway 401, is part of a broader $200-billion initiative to enhance transit and economic efficiency in Ontario, despite potential high costs.
The Ontario government’s resolve to navigate both international pressures and domestic challenges is evident. The Speech from the Throne serves as a comprehensive blueprint for strengthening the social fabric of the province, ensuring economic stability, and improving the quality of life for Ontarians.

As the government implements these plans, Premier Ford’s leadership will be measured by his ability to protect Ontario’s interests on the global stage while delivering tangible improvements to the lives of its citizens. The path forward requires a careful balance of diplomacy, innovation, and investment, with Ontarians keenly observing the government’s actions in this critical period.

Shopping for Thrones

Donald Trump seems to have quite the royal flair, doesn’t he? His foray into politics comes complete with all the pomp and circumstance you’d expect from a would-be king. From turning rallies into theatrical spectacles to ceremonies that have you wondering if a crown might appear, he’s certainly not shy about projecting a larger-than-life image.

His leadership style, marked by attempts to expand his power and tweak the rules, draws cheers from his fans who love the break from tradition. Meanwhile, critics are left clutching their pearls, worried about the potential for a royal takeover.

Trump’s fascination with all things regal seems like both a play for power and a personal love affair with the grandeur of monarchy. As his influence lingers, his royal tendencies keep everyone talking.

In my editorial cartoon for Wednesday, I poke a bit of fun at this ongoing dialogue about Trump’s king-like ambitions—a theme I can’t help but revisit. Today’s Speech From The Throne in Ontario consumed by the threat of Trump tariffs seemed like an apt occasion to put him in the scene.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 16, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

April 16, 2025 | Shopping For Thrones https://youtu.be/N3Jjxg8R21g

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Tuesday April 15, 2025

April 15, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday April 15, 2025

Climate Change Takes a Backseat in Canada’s 2025 Election

March 19, 2025

As Canadians head to the polls in 2025, the pressing issue of climate change seems to have been relegated to a whisper amidst the cacophony of economic concerns, tariffs, and geopolitical tensions. The two major parties, the Poilievre Conservatives and the Carney Liberals, have conspicuously sidestepped the climate crisis in their campaigns, raising critical questions about their commitment to addressing what remains one of the most urgent challenges of our time.

Analysis: Election 2025: a voter’s guide to carbon taxes, natural resources and other key environment issues in Canada

In recent elections, climate change was at the forefront, with parties vying to present credible plans to reduce emissions and transition to a sustainable future. However, today, the political landscape has shifted dramatically. According to Vote Compass data, environmental issues have plummeted in voter priority, eclipsed by immediate economic pressures and Canada-U.S. relations. Yet, the urgency of the climate crisis has not diminished; it is merely overshadowed.

September 25, 2024

The Conservatives’ Concerning Silence: Pierre Poilievre’s Conservatives have adopted a strategy that sidesteps comprehensive climate policy. By framing climate change as a “global problem” and proposing Canadian LNG exports as a solution to reduce global coal usage, Poilievre avoids committing to domestic emissions targets. This absence of a solid, actionable plan is concerning and unacceptable. While economic growth and job creation are vital, they cannot come at the expense of ignoring a crisis that demands immediate and sustained action.

News: Climate change fades as a campaign issue as tariffs dominate federal election

October 10, 2024

The Liberals’ Temporary Retreat: On the other side, Mark Carney’s Liberals have made a strategic retreat by eliminating the consumer carbon price. This move, influenced by public dissatisfaction and economic pressures, might be seen as a temporary concession—a pragmatic pause rather than a permanent shift. For those concerned about climate change, this decision is a double-edged sword: it alleviates immediate economic burdens but risks undermining long-term climate goals.

The hope remains that this pause is just that—temporary. The Liberals must return to the table with a robust communications strategy, one that clearly articulates the benefits of carbon pricing and other climate policies. The Trudeau Liberals’ rollout of the carbon tax was fraught with challenges, allowing the Poilievre Conservatives to hijack the narrative and cast it as a burden rather than a necessary step towards sustainability.

Analysis: In 2021, there was nearly a consensus on climate change. In 2025, Carney and Poilievre are far apart

March 14, 2024

A Call for Courage and Clarity: The reluctance of both parties to address climate change head-on is a disservice to Canadians and future generations. While other issues understandably demand attention, the climate crisis cannot be perpetually postponed. It requires bold leadership and a commitment to transparent, effective policies that balance economic growth with environmental stewardship.

The 2025 election should have been an opportunity to strengthen Canada’s resolve in fighting climate change, not a retreat into the shadows of political convenience. As voters, we must demand more from our leaders—a clear, unwavering commitment to a sustainable future. The time for silence is over; the climate cannot wait.

The Illusion that Climate Change is a Non-Issue – This cartoon is bound to ruffle feathers among both Liberal and Conservative partisans. Yet, as I’ve stated before and will reiterate, my allegiance is to truth, not to any political party. Editorial cartoonists should be impartial, challenging all sides equally. Our purpose is to provoke thought, which naturally may offend those with entrenched political loyalties.

Supporters of Pierre Poilievre might argue against the depiction of him as a climate denier, while Liberals may question why their leader is depicted alongside him. However, both leaders share a stance against the carbon tax. The previous government under Justin Trudeau introduced a well-intentioned tax and rebate scheme aimed at taxing the largest consumer polluters—those with multiple cars, properties, and frequent travel habits—while benefiting the environmentally conscious and less affluent citizens. Unfortunately, Trudeau failed to effectively communicate the policy’s benefits, allowing Poilievre to exploit this communication gap and rally against it.

The consumer carbon pricing scheme, a key tool for meeting Canada’s Paris Agreement commitments, now teeters on the brink of extinction. Mark Carney, in an unexpected move, completed Poilievre’s “Axe the Tax” campaign, dismantling a program that had potential for significant environmental impact.

If Poilievre assumes office, the illusion of his environmental concern will dissipate, aligning with climate-denying regimes. Conversely, if Carney takes the helm, there’s a glimmer of hope for reintroducing consumer carbon taxes, though he remains reticent about his plans, and his supporters remain uncurious.

We find ourselves in a precarious position, seemingly ignoring the gravity of climate change, influenced by misinformation and rhetoric from a conservative leader who dismisses the climate crisis. Drill baby drill, is the mantra of Conservatives, a familiar refrain to was is heard in the south – yes the fossil fuel sector is important especially in light of tariff turmoil, but it is imperative that we remain vigilant, demanding transparency and action to safeguard our planet’s future.

Master illusionists of Environmental Policies – April 15, 2025: https://youtu.be/4wuAP1x6RMY

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack