2025-06 – Page 2 – mackaycartoons

Saturday March 22, 2025

March 22, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday March 22, 2025

The Tesla Turmoil in Canada

October 26, 2024

In recent years, the relationship between the United States and Canada has been strained, largely due to the actions and policies of former President Donald Trump. His approach of using “economic force” has led to unintended and destructive consequences, sparking unrest and acts reminiscent of guerilla warfare.

News: Canadians Turn on Tesla, and It Becomes Physical

The tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum imposed by the Trump administration marked a significant shift away from the cooperative spirit of the USMCA free trade agreement. Hamilton, Ontario, a key player in Canada’s steel industry, has been hit hard by these measures. By ignoring the principles of trust and goodwill in the USMCA, Trump has not only damaged diplomatic ties but also ignited resentment and resistance among Canadians.

January 28, 2025

Adding to the tension, Trump’s comments about Canada becoming the 51st state have stirred unease. Such remarks, whether serious or not, undermine the sovereignty and pride of Canada, a long-standing ally. Coupled with Elon Musk’s alleged statement that “Canada is not a real country,” these actions suggest a troubling disregard for Canada’s independence.

Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and an advisor to Trump, has become a divisive figure in this narrative. Known for his controversial behaviour, Musk has been given the task of drastically reducing the U.S. federal workforce. His influence extends beyond business, as he uses his social media platform to spread information that some believe interferes with democratic processes. Musk’s rhetoric against Canada, including the alleged remark that “Canada is not a real country,” has only intensified the animosity. For many Canadians, Musk represents a direct threat to their sovereignty and democracy.

January 21, 2025

The backlash against Musk in Canada has been swift and intense. In Hamilton, more than 80 Teslas were vandalized, seen by many as a protest against what they perceive as an attack on their livelihoods. While vandalism is undoubtedly destructive, it reflects a deeper sense of frustration and desperation. When faced with economic force from a hardline president, these acts of defiance become a form of protest for those who feel marginalized and powerless.

News: Tesla under fire: Vanadalism, protests in Hamilton signal tense U.S.-Canada relations

August 28, 2018

The Trump administration’s decision to label these acts as “domestic terrorism” seems inconsistent, especially when compared to the pardons granted to those involved in the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot. Describing violent rioters as “patriots” while condemning Canadian protestors as terrorists highlights a troubling inconsistency in the application of justice.

The events unfolding in Canada serve as a warning about the unintended consequences of using economic force without considering diplomatic integrity and international cooperation. As tensions rise and acts of defiance continue, it is crucial for leaders to reflect on the impact of their policies and rhetoric. True leadership requires not only strength but also empathy and respect for the sovereignty and dignity of all nations.

Resisting Tesla

Some thoughts on the recent spate of vandalism against Teslas, especially since 80 of them were targeted in my own community, grabbing international attention. This is happening amidst some broader political and economic issues. Now, don’t get me wrong—I think the Tesla trucks are quite the eyesore, but generally, I’m a fan of electric cars. Elon’s are called “Cybertrucks,” am I right? The problem is, owning one is just too costly for many of us. So, when I see a Tesla on the road, I can’t help but think its driver is flaunting wealth, much like those who used to drive around in those obnoxious Hummers.

I’m not one to condone vandalism against personal property, but in this case, I find myself understanding the resistance. Here’s why:

Donald Trump launched an economic war against Canada, disregarding the good faith established by the USMCA. By imposing harsh tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum, he’s directly targeting Hamilton, the heart of our steel industry.

His comments about wanting Canada to become the 51st state are unsettling, to say the least.

Trump enlisted Elon Musk—yeah, the world’s richest guy, who’s been leaning far right and has a bizarre knack for making Nazi-style salutes—to slash the U.S. federal civil service with mass firings.

The idea that “Canada is not a real country” aligns with Trump’s annexation ambitions.

Musk’s influence, especially through his social media platform, is a genuine threat to Canadian sovereignty. His spread of misinformation and interference in elections is alarming.

The backlash against Musk is rooted in his ties with Trump and the assault on livelihoods, especially in Hamilton. While I can’t support the vandalism itself, I see it as a reaction to Musk’s provocations.

Labeling this as “domestic terrorism” by Trump’s administration is laughable, especially considering the pardons given to those he called “patriots” after the January 6th Capitol attack.

In essence, when a hardline president imposes “economic force,” it’s almost inevitable that guerrilla warfare-like resistance will follow. That’s precisely what’s unfolding now.

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Friday March 21, 2025

March 21, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday March 21, 2025

A Long Overdue Election and a Pivotal Moment for Canada

Federal Election 2021

As Canada stands on the brink of a snap federal election, it’s clear that this momentous decision is long overdue. The political landscape has undergone seismic shifts, with the resignation of Justin Trudeau and the emergence of Mark Carney as the new leader of the Liberal Party. This election offers Canadians a crucial opportunity to navigate the considerable challenges facing our nation, from economic uncertainty to strained international relations.

The Liberal Party’s leadership change has rejuvenated a party that, under Trudeau, faced the risk of electoral disaster. Trudeau’s resignation marked the end of an era, removing a polarizing figure whose declining approval ratings threatened to push the Liberals into obscurity. In his place, Mark Carney has stepped onto the national stage, offering a fresh perspective and a steady hand in turbulent times.

Analysis: A Federal Election is Imminent

March 14, 2025

Carney’s ascent has reversed the fortunes of the Liberals, transforming them from underdogs to formidable contenders. Under Trudeau, the party struggled against the Conservatives, who enjoyed a commanding 20% lead in the polls for many months. This drastic turnaround underscores the power of Carney’s leadership, which combines economic acumen with a global perspective, qualities essential for confronting the challenges posed by U.S. President Donald Trump’s aggressive trade policies and annexation rhetoric.

For the Conservatives, led by Pierre Poilievre, this election represents a critical juncture. Poilievre has effectively capitalized on domestic issues like affordability and housing, but his failure to articulate a positive vision for the future beyond criticizing the Liberals may hinder his campaign. The absence of Trudeau has left a void in Poilievre’s narrative, forcing him to redefine his platform amidst shifting voter priorities.

Trump’s influence looms large over this election, shifting the focus from domestic concerns to matters of national sovereignty and foreign policy. This shift plays to the Liberals’ advantage, highlighting Carney’s strengths in navigating international crises. Poilievre, perceived by some as ideologically aligned with Trump, must now prove his capacity to stand firm against external threats.

News: Mark Carney expected to call snap election for April 28

February 4, 2025

The upcoming election is not just about choosing a leader; it’s about deciding the direction of our nation. Canadians are faced with pressing questions: Who can best protect our interests on the world stage? Who will steer our economy through potential recessions and trade disputes? This election provides a platform for Canadians to voice their aspirations and concerns, ensuring that our leaders are equipped to address the complex realities of our time.

In this pivotal moment, the electorate has the power to shape the future of Canada. The stakes are high, and the choices we make now will echo for years to come. As we approach this election, let us recognize it as an opportunity to chart a course for a stronger, more resilient Canada. It’s time for Canadians to engage in this crucial dialogue and decide on the path forward for our nation.

Canada vs. Trump; But first a slapping contest

Finally, we’re on the cusp of a federal election—it’s been a long time coming and finally gives Canadians the chance to choose a path to tackle some big challenges. With Mark Carney stepping in for the Liberals, things have really shaken up. He’s turned the tables on Poilievre’s Conservative lead, which was holding strong when Trudeau was at the helm. Honestly, I was never a fan of Trudeau and thought he should’ve exited the political stage ages ago, not just last week.

As for Poilievre, he doesn’t really bring anything to the table except complaints against anyone who disagrees with him. That’s not the kind of leadership we need. Carney, on the other hand, has the expertise to steer the economy and government, but he’s going to have to handle some rough political slaps as he dives into this election. It’s going to be up to Canadians to see who can unite the country and face the challenge of dealing with Trump’s influence.

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Thursday March 20, 2025

March 20, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday March 20, 2025

Also Published in the Toronto Star.

Canada’s Defense Dilemma: Rethinking Reliance on Uncle Sam

January 11, 2023

For many years after World War II, Canada counted on the United States as a reliable ally, keeping our borders safe and secure. This close bond, strengthened by common values and strong trade ties, allowed Canada to focus on other important issues while relying on American military power. However, the world has changed a lot, and recent events make it clear that Canada needs to rethink how much it relies on the U.S. for defence.

News: Canada reconsidering F-35 purchase amid tensions with Washington, says minister

July 19, 2010

The presidency of Donald Trump has put a strain on this long-standing friendship. His administration’s lack of respect for trade agreements, like the USMCA, and the introduction of tough trade tariffs have put a dent in our economic relationship. On top of that, Trump’s unsettling comments about Canada becoming the “51st state” and his friendly stance towards leaders like Vladimir Putin add to the complexity. In this uncertain environment, Canada must carefully navigate its defence and security policies.

A major issue at hand is Canada’s plan to buy F-35 fighter jets, which has sparked a lot of debate. While these jets are meant to modernize Canada’s aging air fleet, relying on U.S.-controlled technology poses risks. The possibility that a future U.S. administration could deny necessary software updates for political reasons highlights the danger of depending too heavily on one supplier.

September 11, 2012

Canada must look at other options for defence partnerships and diversify where it gets its military equipment. The Swedish Gripen, for example, offers benefits like local assembly and less reliance on U.S. maintenance. This could help boost Canada’s defence industry and increase our independence. Building stronger defence ties with other friendly nations could give Canada the flexibility it needs in a changing world.

News: Canada must weigh risk Trump blocks software upgrades for F-35s: former official

October 2, 2014

While it’s important to keep a cooperative relationship with the U.S., Canada also needs to be ready for a less friendly neighbour. This means finding a balance between working together and being independent, ensuring Canada can protect itself if needed. Strengthening our own defence capabilities and investing in homegrown technology should be priorities to keep us safe.

In short, Canada is at a turning point in its defence strategy. We need to carefully consider the current global situation, our economic interests, and our national security needs. By broadening our defence partnerships and reducing our reliance on any single ally, Canada can better protect its sovereignty and security in these unpredictable times.

I’ve put together an editorial cartoon that captures the current state of Canada’s defence strategy, inspired by the topsy-turvy dynamics of our relationship with the U.S. Picture an F-35 flying upside down—a nod to “Top Gun.”

With Donald Trump’s disregard for trade agreements like the USMCA and his cozying up to figures like Putin, it’s clear Canada can’t fully depend on the U.S. as a reliable ally as we once did. Yet, cooperation is still necessary, even amid rhetoric about Canada becoming the 51st state.

It’s a tough balancing act. We need to decide whether to continue feeding the military-industrial complex or explore new partnerships beyond the usual U.S. ties. The cartoon aims to spark some reflection on how Canada can best navigate these challenges.

Please enjoy my making-of animated editorial cartoon for March 20, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Wednesday March 19, 2025

March 19, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday March 19, 2025

Pierre Poilievre’s Plan to Undo Carbon Pricing: A Step Backward for Canada’s Climate Commitment

June 20, 2024

As the climate crisis intensifies, countries around the world are working hard to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and meet international targets. Many progressive industrial nations have adopted carbon pricing as a crucial part of their strategy to combat climate change. However, Pierre Poilievre’s plan to eliminate carbon pricing in Canada risks reversing the progress we’ve made and could harm our reputation on the global stage.

Carbon pricing is an important tool that encourages businesses to cut emissions by making it cost-effective to invest in cleaner technologies. By putting a price on carbon emissions, we motivate companies to adopt greener practices, ultimately benefiting both the environment and the economy. Poilievre’s opposition to this approach shows a reluctance to embrace the necessary steps for a sustainable future for Canadians.

News: Net zero by 2050 ‘impossible’ for UK, says Badenoch

July 21, 2022

A worrying trend among conservative leaders is emerging globally, as highlighted by Kemi Badenoch’s recent comments in the UK. Badenoch, leader of the Conservative Party, stated that achieving the UK’s net zero target by 2050 is “impossible” without harming living standards or bankrupting the country. This marks a significant departure from the previous political agreement on the importance of addressing climate change. By aligning with such views, Poilievre risks placing Canada among those countries that are stepping back from their environmental responsibilities.

It’s also worth noting that Canadian conservatives once had a more forward-thinking approach. Under Erin O’Toole’s leadership, the Conservative Party supported carbon pricing as part of a broader climate strategy. O’Toole recognized the need for a carbon pricing system to drive innovation and reduce emissions. However, with Poilievre now leading the party, it has shifted back to outright opposition to carbon pricing, which is a significant step backwards.

August 13, 2021

If Canada rolls back carbon pricing, we could find ourselves among the nations failing to meet their climate commitments. This move would significantly hinder our ability to achieve the net-zero emissions target by 2050, which is essential for tackling climate change. Without a solid pricing mechanism, businesses may lack the motivation to innovate or shift to lower-carbon options.

Moreover, eliminating carbon pricing would damage public trust in Canada’s commitment to international agreements like the Paris Accord. As other countries advance their climate policies, Canada risks being seen as disengaged from the global effort to address climate change. This perception could hurt our international relationships and competitiveness in a world that increasingly values sustainability.

The revenue generated from carbon pricing is also crucial for funding green projects, public transportation, and renewable energy initiatives. Poilievre’s plan to scrap this revenue would rob Canada of essential funding needed to transition to a low-carbon economy, jeopardizing job creation in the green sector.

News: Poilievre says he would repeal federal carbon pricing for industrial emissions

June 2, 2017

In contrast to Poilievre’s vision, maintaining and strengthening carbon pricing would show leadership in climate action. It would send a clear message that Canada is serious about its environmental responsibilities and is committed to a sustainable future.

Pierre Poilievre’s plan to undo carbon pricing is a step backward that could undermine our climate commitments and hinder our ability to meet global targets. It aligns with a troubling trend among conservative leaders who prioritize economic concerns over environmental protection, as seen in the UK with Badenoch’s remarks. It also represents a retreat from the more progressive stance taken by former Conservative leader Erin O’Toole, who understood the importance of carbon pricing. Canada must remain a leader in the fight against climate change, embracing policies that promote innovation and accountability. The time has come to stand firm in our commitment to a sustainable future and reject proposals that seek to undermine our progress. The future of our planet depends on it.

Make Canada a Climate Laggard Again

If there’s one thing we can say about Justin Trudeau’s legacy, it’s that he put a price on carbon—something that had been debated and denied for years, especially under Stephen Harper’s government. Choosing not to commit to carbon pricing put Canada on the global map of climate laggards, alongside countries that talk a big game about caring for the planet but never actually take meaningful action. It was a pretty embarrassing time for us, especially when we were aligning ourselves with the “drill baby drill” mentality of climate deniers in the U.S.

Now, it feels like we’re sliding back into that old mindset with our own Conservative Party. Just when Canada is trying to set itself apart from the U.S. and connect with progressive partners who genuinely care about climate action, Pierre Poilievre pushed hard to axe the consumer carbon tax, got what he wanted just last week when the new PM Mark Carney did that very thing. Now, Poilievre is calling for the elimination of the industrial carbon tax as well. It’s got people questioning: if there’s no price on carbon, what real action does the Conservative Party plan to take on climate change? This stance could very well make them unelectable come 2025.

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Monday March 17, 2025

March 17, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Monday March 17, 2025

Also published in the Toronto Star.

The End of an Era: Farewell to Hudson’s Bay, a Canadian Icon

As we bid farewell to Hudson’s Bay Company, we are not just witnessing the closure of a retail chain but the end of an era that has woven itself into the very fabric of Canadian history and identity. For over three centuries, Hudson’s Bay has been more than a shopping destination; it has been a symbol of exploration, innovation, and resilience.

Founded in 1670, Hudson’s Bay was at the forefront of the fur trade, playing a pivotal role in the exploration and mapping of vast stretches of North America. Its iconic trading posts served as the foundation for many Canadian communities, marking the beginning of settlements that would grow into thriving cities. The company’s history is a testament to the spirit of adventure and enterprise that has shaped our nation.

News: Hudson’s Bay returns to court to seek approval to begin liquidating its business

However, the trajectory of Hudson’s Bay took a significant turn in 2008, when it was acquired by NRDC Equity Partners, a U.S. equity group. This acquisition marked a new chapter for the company, reflecting the broader realities of globalization. We’ve become accustomed to seeing long-established Canadian institutions pass into foreign hands—from donuts to beer, and from steel companies to department stores. Many things Canadians have embraced as their own are now under the control of foreign corporations.

To Canadian nationalists, this trend can feel like an affront. The idea that the fate of a Tim Horton’s maple glazed donut rests with a board in Ohio or that a Molson Canadian beer is influenced by decisions made in Denver can be unsettling. Similarly, the sale of Hudson’s Bay to an American investment corporation might be dismissed with a yawn by some, but it’s emblematic of a larger shift.

What many, including myself, find intriguing and lamentable is how the story of the once mighty Hudson’s Bay Company ends like this. A company that ruled over vast, undeveloped lands in North America for centuries is now just another token of commerce, passed between owners with little regard for its historical significance. Chartered in 1670 by King Charles II, Hudson’s Bay built relationships with Indigenous peoples, mapped rivers and coastlines, and laid the groundwork for Canada as we know it today. It’s difficult to dismiss this as just another corporate transaction.

News: The fall of Hudson’s Bay Co., a Canadian retail icon

In the present day, the rub against Canadians is compounded by the rhetoric from the current President, who openly discusses the idea of annexation and making Canada the 51st state. This adds another layer of complexity and tension, as Canadians grapple with the loss of iconic brands and the broader implications of such political discourse.

Yet, amidst this change, there is a silver lining. The original documents, photos, drawings, and records of the Hudson’s Bay Company will remain in Canada, preserved in the HBC Archives in Winnipeg, Manitoba. This ensures that the legacy of Hudson’s Bay, its contributions to Canadian history, and its influence on the development of the nation will not be forgotten.

July 18, 2008

As we move forward, let us honour the legacy of Hudson’s Bay by supporting local businesses, fostering community connections, and celebrating the rich tapestry of Canadian history that it helped to create. The end of Hudson’s Bay is a loss, but it is also an opportunity to reflect on what it means to be Canadian and how we can carry forward the values that have defined this iconic institution for centuries.

This editorial cartoon was adapted from one which was originally published July 18, 2008

As I think about the closure of Hudson’s Bay, I find myself reflecting on its significance in shaping Canada’s history. While I can’t recall the last time I visited one of their stores, my connection to Hudson’s Bay is symbolized by the iconic striped blanket that keeps me warm every night—a fun fact being that these blankets are actually made in the UK.

Today, I’m in Toronto for an event tonight, and plan to make a nostalgic stop this afternoon at the flagship store at Yonge and Bay. If its doors are still open, I’ll take a moment to appreciate the memories and legacy of this storied institution.

The transition of Hudson’s Bay into American ownership in 2008 was a moment I captured in a cartoon, and now, with the rise of e-commerce, it faces new challenges. Although the retail landscape has changed, the history and impact of Hudson’s Bay continue to resonate, reminding us of its enduring role in our national narrative.

This editorial cartoon was adapted from one which was originally published July 18, 2008 https://mackaycartoons.net/2008/07/18/july-18-2008/

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack