2025-12 – Page 2 – mackaycartoons

Saturday June 21, 2025

June 21, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday June 21, 2025

Tariffs, Flames, and Summer Games: A Season of Surprises

December 20, 2022

As the summer solstice approaches on June 21, 2025, we find ourselves at a pivotal moment marked by significant political and environmental timelines. This longest day of the year, with its promise of extended daylight and warmer days, serves as a powerful metaphor for the varied and often conflicting timelines that shape our current reality.

In Canada, the government’s response to U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum has been met with criticism from industry leaders. Prime Minister Mark Carney has outlined a 30-day window to adjust counter-tariffs, dependent on progress in trade negotiations with President Donald Trump’s administration. This timeline reflects an urgent need to protect Canadian industries while dealing with the complexities of international diplomacy. However, the Canadian steel producers and workers express dissatisfaction, arguing that the measures fall short of addressing the crisis.

News: Steel industry groups say Carney’s retaliatory plan for U.S. tariffs ‘falls short’

June 17, 2025

Simultaneously, the passage of Bill C-5 looms large, threatening to strain relations between the Canadian government and First Nations communities. The Assembly of First Nations has voiced strong opposition, citing inadequate consultation and potential infringement on treaty rights. The potential for a “long, hot summer” of protests highlights the urgency and gravity of this issue.

Across the border, President Trump’s penchant for two-week timelines has become a hallmark of his administration. Whether it’s decisions on Iran, trade policies, or domestic issues, this timeline often serves as a placeholder, creating uncertainty and anticipation. While it allows for strategic flexibility, it also leaves allies and adversaries alike in a state of limbo, uncertain of the U.S.’s next moves.

News: A familiar metric: White House says to expect Iran decision within ‘two weeks’

July 29, 2023

As we stand on the cusp of summer, these timelines intersect with the broader context of a warming climate. Recent scenes of hellacious wildfires in Canada’s western provinces have underscored the immediate and devastating impact of climate change. These fires have ravaged landscapes and communities, serving as a stark reminder that more such events are likely in the months to come. The season brings with it the expected perils of wildfires, heatwaves, and extreme weather, underscoring the need for decisive action on climate change.

Disturbingly, despite the G7 meeting taking place just a few hundred kilometres from the whiffs of burning embers, the topic of climate change was not even offered up for discussion. This omission highlights a glaring disconnect between the urgent realities on the ground and the political agenda at the highest levels.

June 18, 2025

Yet, amid these challenges, there remains the hope and anticipation of summer vacations—a respite from the weight of decision-making and the relentless pace of news cycles. This summer, as we face these varied timelines, we are reminded of the delicate balance between urgency and patience, between action and reflection. The solstice, with its ancient traditions and astronomical significance, offers a moment to pause and consider how we can align our timelines with the natural rhythms of the Earth.

News: When is the summer solstice and what is it?

In a world fraught with uncertainty, the promise of warmer days and longer evenings invites us to find solace in the simple pleasures of summer. Whether it’s a moment of quiet reflection at dawn, a gathering with friends around a bonfire, or a long-anticipated vacation, let us embrace the season with a renewed sense of hope and purpose. As we await the decisions that will shape our future, may we find the courage to act with wisdom and the grace to savour the present.

Friday June 20, 2025

June 20, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday June 20, 2025

Balancing Boom and Respect: Ontario’s Ring of Fire Dilemma

June 6, 2025

The development of Ontario’s Ring of Fire region presents a critical opportunity for sustainable economic growth, not only for the province but for Canada as a whole. Rich in crucial minerals like nickel and gold, this area has the potential to significantly bolster our economy, particularly in the face of external pressures such as those posed by a hostile administration in the White House. However, realizing this potential requires balancing development with respect for Indigenous rights and environmental sustainability.

At the centre of this debate is Bill 5, the “Protect Ontario by Unleashing Our Economy Act,” which aims to expedite the approval process for large infrastructure projects, including those in the Ring of Fire. While the bill is designed to reduce project approval times from 15 years to just two, it has been met with significant opposition. Critics argue that it undermines treaty rights and environmental protections by creating “special economic zones” that prioritize rapid development over due process.

News: Doug Ford accuses First Nations of ‘coming hat in hand’ for government money, despite treating them ‘like gold’

May 29 2025

Premier Doug Ford’s recent comments about Indigenous communities coming “hat in hand” for government support have added fuel to the fire. While his intent may have been to highlight opportunities for self-sufficiency and economic partnership, the language used was perceived as insensitive and disrespectful. Such remarks risk evoking historical stereotypes that overlook the systemic challenges faced by Indigenous communities and can undermine the trust needed for meaningful collaboration.

There is a general consensus among many stakeholders that advancing sustainable development in the Ring of Fire is essential. However, this must be pursued with a commitment to thorough and genuine consultation with Indigenous communities. Their voices and rights are pivotal in any development plans, as they have a direct stake in the land and its resources.

Opposition to development is inevitable, and there will always be dissenting voices. These positions should be respectfully considered and addressed, ensuring that the government truly represents the will of the majority while honouring its commitments to Indigenous peoples. This is not just a matter of legal obligation but a moral one, integral to the fabric of our national identity and values.

News: Doug Ford accused of ‘racist’ comments ahead of meeting with First Nations chiefs

April 23, 2006

The broader societal debate reflects a tension between economic aspirations and the need to uphold environmental and Indigenous rights. It is crucial for political leaders, like Premier Ford, to navigate these discussions with sensitivity and respect. The language used in political discourse can either bridge divides or deepen them, and it is the responsibility of our leaders to foster unity and understanding.

As we contemplate the development of the Ring of Fire under Bill 5, let us strive for a future where economic growth does not come at the expense of our principles or the well-being of Indigenous communities. It is possible to achieve a balance that respects both the land and its people, ensuring that the benefits of development are shared equitably and sustainably. This requires thoughtful leadership, open dialogue, and a commitment to reconciliation—a path that acknowledges our past and looks forward to a prosperous and inclusive future.

Premier Doug’s Inappropriate Dance

The Ring of Fire region in Ontario presents a significant opportunity for economic growth due to its rich mineral deposits. Bill 5 aims to speed up development, but it has ignited controversy over potential impacts on Indigenous rights and the environment. Premier Doug Ford’s comments about Indigenous communities seeking “handouts” have been criticized, highlighting the need for respectful dialogue. While many see development as essential, it must be pursued with careful consideration of Indigenous perspectives and environmental protections. By fostering open communication, Ontario can find a path that benefits all stakeholders and respects the land’s heritage.

Ontario’s Ring of Fire holds immense economic potential with its rich mineral resources. Bill 5 aims to fast-track development, but it’s sparked debate over Indigenous rights and environmental concerns.

Doug Ford’s comments about Indigenous communities seeking “handouts” have been criticized as lacking sensitivity. While the goal is self-sufficiency, it’s crucial to engage in respectful and meaningful dialogue with Indigenous groups who have a deep connection to the land.

He wisely took the unexpected step of apologizing alongside Indigenous leaders in a press conference after the meeting. Unfortunately for Dougie, his mea culpa came too late for my deadline.

Most agree that development is important, but it must be done thoughtfully. We need to balance economic growth with respecting Indigenous rights and environmental protections. By fostering open and honest communication, we can find a path forward that benefits everyone and honours our commitments to Indigenous communities.

If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for June 20, 2025, below!

YouTube: https://youtu.be/Dg_EiVeT_9s

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Thursday June 19, 2025

June 19, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday June 19, 2025

Also published in The Toronto Star.

Hotheads at the Helm: Navigating Middle East Turbulence

December 10, 2024

As tensions escalate in the Middle East, the spotlight turns to the leaders at the helm: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and U.S. President Donald Trump. Each of these figures brings a distinct style of leadership, characterized by assertiveness and, at times, unpredictability. In a region fraught with historical grievances and contemporary challenges, the stakes are high, and the need for steady, measured leadership has never been more critical.

Netanyahu’s recent shift in military strategy marks a departure from Israel’s long-standing policy of containment towards more aggressive actions against Iran and its proxies. While this approach aims to neutralize perceived threats, it also risks entrenching Israel further into prolonged conflict. Netanyahu’s decisive yet polarizing leadership style has drawn both support and criticism, reflecting the complex calculus of security and diplomacy in the region.

News: Here’s Donald Trump’s endgame in Iran

Tuesday October 7, 2024

In Iran, Khamenei’s enduring defiance amid mounting pressures highlights his steadfast commitment to preserving the Islamic Republic’s ideological and strategic interests. However, his leadership faces significant challenges as Iran grapples with internal dissent and external threats. The current crisis tests the resilience of a regime built on a foundation of revolutionary fervour and regional influence.

Trump’s return to the presidency has reintroduced a brand of leadership that is both assertive and controversial. While his administration touts a strong stance against adversaries like Iran, critics argue that his approach lacks the nuance and diplomacy necessary for resolving complex international issues. The U.S., once a beacon of freedom and democracy, faces scrutiny under leadership perceived by some as divisive and unpredictable.

As battle lines are drawn, the world watches with bated breath, aware that the decisions made by these leaders could have far-reaching consequences. The volatile nature of the current leadership landscape underscores the importance of caution and diplomacy. Hotheaded decisions made in the heat of the moment could escalate conflicts, leading to unintended and potentially catastrophic outcomes.

Opinion: Iran War Reflects a Changed Middle East and a New Israeli Military Doctrine

September 28, 2024

For the international community, the path forward requires a renewed commitment to dialogue and collaboration. Engaging with regional and global partners to address the root causes of conflict and promote stability is essential. Encouraging restraint and fostering an environment conducive to negotiation will be key to averting further escalation.

In these uncertain times, steady leadership is paramount. The challenges facing the Middle East demand leaders who can balance assertiveness with diplomacy, strength with compassion, and resolve with flexibility. It is through such leadership that the region can hope to navigate its way toward lasting peace and security.

As history has shown, the choices made by leaders today will shape the future for generations to come. The call for measured leadership is not just a plea for peace but a demand for responsible governance that prioritizes the well-being of all people in the region. Only then can the Middle East move beyond the cycle of conflict and towards a brighter, more stable future.

Gambling with World War III

Right now, the future of the Middle East—and potentially the world—rests with three of the most volatile leaders we could imagine: Benjamin Netanyahu, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and Donald Trump. Each of them is surrounded by folks eager for conflict and religious extremism, making this a truly nerve-wracking situation.

These aging leaders seem more interested in their legacies than in the well-being of nations and lives. Their actions threaten to tip the world into another crisis, as their inability to sit down and talk things out could set off a chain reaction of chaos.

This isn’t a game with any winners. The lives of countless people are in the hands of these three, and their next moves could lead to widespread suffering. We can only hope that someone, somewhere, finds a way to bring some sanity to the situation before it’s too late.

Wednesday June 18, 2025

June 18, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday June 18, 2025

Published also in The Toronto Star, and on Politico Europe.

Trump’s G7 Exit: Same Play, Different Day

Donald Trump’s early exit from the 2025 G7 Summit in Kananaskis serves as a reminder that this tendency is not new. It resurrects questions about the United States’ engagement in global affairs under his leadership, highlighting a pattern of ambiguity that has characterized Trump’s presidency and its impact on international relations.

June 9, 2018

From his abrupt departure during the 2018 Canadian-hosted summit to leaving the recent G7 meeting, Trump’s actions often puzzle observers and allies alike. The official reason for his hasty exit—the escalating Middle East conflict—contrasts sharply with his stated disinterest in negotiating peace, leaving the international community in a state of uncertainty about America’s role in the crisis between Iran and Israel.

Opinion: Even when he’s smiling, Trump stands apart

June 13, 2025

The summit in Kananaskis, hosted by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, aimed to address pressing global challenges, including the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy sought international support for tougher measures against Russia, amidst Trump’s approval of limited military aid to Ukraine. However, Trump’s absence from direct discussions with Zelenskyy underscores a missed opportunity for reaffirming U.S. commitment to Ukraine, further complicating diplomatic efforts.

This behaviour reflects a broader dilemma within U.S. foreign policy under Trump, fluctuating between the “America First” mantra that propelled him to power and the nation’s historic role as a leader in global affairs. The inconsistency creates an impression of a schizophrenic foreign policy, dictated by Trump’s immediate priorities and whims rather than a coherent strategy.

Analysis: For G7 leaders, immense global challenges weigh on agenda overshadowed by Trump

December 19, 2024

Trade remained another contentious issue, with unresolved discussions, particularly between the U.S. and Japan, highlighting the complexities of international diplomacy. Japan sought relief from U.S. auto tariffs, while Canada and the U.S. worked towards finalizing a trade agreement within a month. Yet, Trump’s focus on domestic and Middle Eastern issues overshadowed potential agreements, leaving allies questioning the reliability of U.S. commitments.

For some leaders, Trump’s early exit might be a relief. It provides the remaining G6 an opportunity to engage in critical discussions without the unpredictability that often accompanies Trump’s presence. This “adults in the room” scenario allows other world leaders to address pressing security challenges and explore strategies to fill the void left by America’s inconsistent participation.

Opinion: The G7 is dead – time to move on to the G6

President Donald Trump's presence at the 2025 G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, is set to influence discussions on trade, climate, and global security.

June 12, 2025

Reader comments echo this sentiment, critiquing Trump’s erratic behaviour and its negative impact on U.S. soft power. His approach, often seen as self-centred and disruptive, challenges traditional alliances and complicates diplomatic efforts. It leaves allies questioning the reliability of U.S. commitments and pondering their own strategies to navigate an uncertain geopolitical landscape.

As the world watches, the broader implications of Trump’s actions remain to be seen. The G7 Summit’s outcome, in the absence of U.S. leadership, may well reflect new alliances and strategies, redefining global cooperation in an era where traditional roles are increasingly blurred. Whether this signals a temporary shift or a longer-term realignment remains an open question, driven by the unpredictable nature of Trump’s presidency.

Boltin’ Donny Trump

At the 2025 G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Donald Trump’s early exit amidst rising tensions in the Middle East has raised serious concerns. His departure left important issues, like support for Ukraine, unaddressed.

While some leaders may have welcomed the break from his unpredictability, this pattern shows a lack of commitment to global cooperation. Why the rush home? Can’t he trust his team to handle things at home for just a few hours while he engages with world leaders?

The truth is, multilateralism isn’t Trump’s style. His “America First” approach often clashes with the teamwork necessary in today’s world. As tensions grow between Israel and Iran, we must ask: Is this the leadership we need?

We need leaders who focus on dialogue and understanding, not quick exits.

YouTube: https://youtu.be/KyMjyvCiHWg

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Tuesday June 17, 2025

June 17, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday June 17, 2025

The Need for Inclusive Governance

June 6, 2025

In a time when quick progress is often seen as vital for economic growth, the introduction of Bills 5 (Better Municipal Governance Act) and 14 in Ontario, along with the federal Bill C-5 (One Canadian Economy Act), raises important concerns about how fast-tracking decisions can affect Indigenous rights and local governance. While these bills aim to streamline processes and promote economic development, the lack of meaningful consultation with Indigenous communities and other levels of government could undermine the very progress they intend to achieve.

At first glance, Bills 5 and C-5 seem to have similar goals, both designed to enhance economic growth and simplify decision-making. However, introducing federal and provincial legislation simultaneously can create confusion among those affected regarding their specific impacts and the consultation processes involved. In a competitive economy, the need to attract investment and create jobs is clear. Yet, rushing to put these laws in place without engaging with impacted communities creates an environment filled with tension and conflict.

News: Chiefs of Ontario decry lack of consultation on Bill C-5

May 29 2025

The main issue is that insufficient consultation can lead to significant problems. When Indigenous communities are not meaningfully involved in decisions that affect their lands and resources, they may feel excluded and distrustful of government actions. This can lead to protests and opposition, as seen with the planned rallies against Bills 5 and C-5. Additionally, failing to consult properly can result in legal challenges, as Indigenous leaders have indicated that they will take action if their rights are overlooked. This can delay projects and deepen historical tensions between Indigenous communities and governments.

Consultation is not just a legal obligation; it can also lead to better outcomes for everyone involved. Indigenous communities often have valuable knowledge about land management and environmental stewardship that can improve project results. Ignoring their input is not only unfair but can also hinder economic progress. Moreover, the urgency to pass these bills might come from a desire to avoid controversy, which can appear autocratic and alienate constituents who feel their voices are not valued. Good governance requires open dialogue and compromise.

News: Anishinabek Nation chief says he briefed Ontario police on protests against Bill 5

Series: Young Doug Ford

As Ontario faces the challenges of economic development, the need for genuine consultation with Indigenous communities and other stakeholders is more important than ever. The introduction of Bills 5 and 14, along with federal Bill C-5, reflects a push for progress, but without proper consultation, we risk damaging the trust and cooperation necessary for sustainable development. To build an economy that respects the rights and voices of all Canadians, both the Ontario government and the federal government must prioritize dialogue and compromise. Only through real engagement can we create a future that honours Indigenous rights and promotes a fair and prosperous society for everyone.